Keywords
How to Cite
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of orthodontic brackets bonded to three different bulk fill composites which were previously aged. Materials and Methods: Three bulk fill composite materials were included in this study (Filtek Bulk Fill, Tetric N-Ceram bulk fill, SureFil SDR bulk fill). Each material group contained 12 samples (n=12); a total of 36 samples were bonded in the same way with maxillary premolar brackets (CB; Avex Mx, OPAL orth.). The same type brackets were bonded on each restored surface made with bulk fill composites. The SBS was examined after storing the specimens for 24 h at 37 ºC indistilled water, followed by thermal ageing (500 cycles between 5 ºC and 55 ºC). Data were analyzed statistically. The numeric data were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey HSD post-hoc tests at α=.05. Results: There were no significant differences among the composite groups (p>0.001). However, SBS values for control group were significantly greater than shear bond strenght values for composite groups (p<0.001). Conclusion: Bond strength of orthodontic brackets on bulk fill composite surfaces was not found adequate. Therefore, this situation leads to bonding failure during orthodontic treatment. The presence of bulk fill composites on the surface to be bonded during orthodontic treatment requires an additional armamentarium.
References
Selwitz, R.H., A.I. Ismail, and N.B. Pitts, Dental caries. Lancet, 2007. 369 (9555): p. 51-9.
Hayashi, M., et al., Teaching of posterior composites in dental schools in Japan. J Oral Rehabil, 2009. 36 (4): p. 292-8.
Ilie, N., S. Bucuta, and M. Draenert, Bulk-fill resin-based composites: an in vitro assessment of their mechanical performance. Oper Dent, 2013. 38 (6): p. 618-25.
Bucuta, S. and N. Ilie, Light transmittance and micro-mechanical properties of bulk fill vs. conventional resin based composites. Clin Oral Investig, 2014. 18 (8): p. 1991-2000.
Moszner, N., et al., Benzoyl germanium derivatives as novel visible light photoinitiators for dental materials. Dent Mater, 2008. 24 (7): p. 901-7.
Blakey, R. and J. Mah, Effects of surface conditioning on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to temporary polycarbonate crowns. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2010. 138 (1): p. 72-8.
Almeida, L.F., L.P. Martins, and R.P. Martins, Effects of reducing light-curing time of a high-power LED device on shear bond strength of brackets. J Orofac Orthop, 2018. 79 (5): p. 352-358.
Perdigao, J., et al., Effects of a self-etching primer on enamel shear bond strengths and SEM morphology. Am J Dent, 1997. 10 (3): p. 141-6.
Tarib, N.A., N. Anuar, and M. Ahmad, Shear bond strength of veneering ceramic to coping materials with different pre-surface treatments. J Adv Prosthodont, 2016. 8 (5): p. 339-344.
Buyuk, S.K. and A.S. Kucukekenci, Effects of different etching methods and bonding procedures on shear bond strength of orthodontic metal brackets applied to different CAD/CAM ceramic materials. Angle Orthod, 2018. 88 (2): p. 221-226.
Artun, J. and S. Bergland, Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment. Am J Orthod, 1984. 85 (4): p. 333-40.
Reynolds, I.R. and J.A. von Fraunhofer, Direct bonding of orthodontic attachments to teeth: the relation of adhesive bond strength to gauze mesh size. Br J Orthod, 1976. 3 (2): p. 91-5.
Hellak, A., et al., Shear Bond Strength of Three Orthodontic Bonding Systems on Enamel and Restorative Materials. Biomed Res Int, 2016. 2016: p. 6307107.
Hioki, M., et al., Shear bond strength and FEM of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement--effects of tooth enamel shape and orthodontic bracket base configuration. Dent Mater J, 2007. 26 (5): p. 700-7.
Cerekja, E. and B. Cakirer, Effect of short curing times with a high-intensity light-emitting diode or high-power halogen on shear bond strength of metal brackets before and after thermocycling. Angle Orthod, 2011. 81 (3): p. 510-6.
Sokucu, O., et al., Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets Cured with Different Light Sources under Thermocycling. Eur J Dent, 2010. 4(3): p. 257-62.
Yuasa, T., et al., Effects of long-term storage and thermocycling on bond strength of two self-etching primer adhesive systems. Eur J Orthod, 2010. 32 (3): p. 285-90.
De Munck, J., et al., Micro-tensile bond strength of adhesives bonded to Class-I cavity-bottom dentin after thermo-cycling. Dent Mater, 2005. 21 (11): p. 999-1007.
Ogaard, B., Fjeld, M., The enamel surface and bonding in orthodontics. Semin Orthod, 2010. 16 (1).
Abdelnaby, Y.L., Effects of cyclic loading on the bond strength of metal orthodontic brackets bonded to a porcelain surface using different conditioning protocols. Angle Orthod, 2011. 81 (6): p. 1064-9.
Naseh, R., et al., Shear bond strength of metal brackets to ceramic surfaces using a universal bonding resin. J Clin Exp Dent, 2018. 10 (8): p. e739-e745.
Reynolds, I., A review of direct orthodontic bonding. BR J ORTHOD, 1975 (2): p. 171-178.
Costa, A.R., et al., Effect of bonding material, etching time and silane on the bond strength of metallic orthodontic brackets to ceramic. Braz Dent J, 2012. 23 (3): p. 223-7.
Barcelo Santana, H.F., et al., Evaluation of bond strength of metal brackets by a resin to ceramic surfaces. J Clin Dent, 2006. 17 (1): p. 5-9.
Grewal Bach, G.K., Y. Torrealba, and M.O. Lagravere, Orthodontic bonding to porcelain: a systematic review. Angle Orthod, 2014. 84 (3): p. 555-60.
Sharma-Sayal, S.K., et al., The influence of orthodontic bracket base design on shear bond strength. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2003. 124 (1): p. 74-82.
Chay, S.H., et al., Effects of surface treatment and aging on the bond strength of orthodontic brackets to provisional materials. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2007. 132 (5): p. 577 e7-11.
Oztas, E., et al., The effect of enamel bleaching on the shear bond strengths of metal and ceramic brackets. Eur J Orthod, 2012. 34 (2): p. 232-7.