Keywords
Restauración dental; Compuesto de resina; Resina Bulk Fill
How to Cite
Abstract
Composite resins are excellent materials for direct restorations in the posterior region, satisfactorily reestablishing esthetics and function. Recently, a new class of composites has been commercialized, the so-called Bulk-fill resins. These resins may be inserted in the dental cavity in increments of 4 to 5 mm thick, and have the advantages of reducing polymerization shrinkage and clinical working time. The aim of this case report was to describe the use of bulk-fill composite resins to restore Class I and Class II cavities by means of two different restorative techniques.
References
Bayne S. C. Beginnings of the dental composite revolution. J Am Dent Assoc. 2013; 144 (8): 880-884.
Gonçalves F., Pfeifer C. S., Ferracane J. L., Braga RR. Contraction Stress Determinants in Dimethacrylate Composites. J Dent Res. 2008; 87 (4): 367-371.
Ilie N., Hickel R. Resin composite restorative materials. Aust. dent. j. 2011; 56: (1 Suppl): 59-66.
Ferracane J. L. Resin composite-State of the art. Dent Mater. 2011; 27 (1): 29-38.
Al Sunbul H., Silikas N., Watts D. C. Polymerization shrinkage kinetics and shrinkage-stress in dental resin-composites. Dent Mater. 2016; 32 (8): 998-1006.
Lee I. B., Cho B. H., Son H. H., Um C. M. A new method to measure the polymerization shrinkage kinetics of light cured composites. J. oral rehabil. 2005; 32 (4): 304-314.
Park J., Chang J., Ferracane J., Bog I. How should composite be layered to reduce shrinkage stress: Incremental or bulk filling? Dent Mater. 2008; 24 (11): 1501-1505.
Kaisarly D., Gezawi M. El. Polymerization shrinkage assessment of dental resin composites: a literature review. Odontology. 2016; 104 (3): 257-270.
Kwon Y., Ferracane J., Lee I. Effect of layering methods, composite type, and flowable liner on the polymerization shrinkage stress of light cured composites. Dent Mater. 2012; 28 (7): 801-809.
Braga R. R., Ferracane J. L. Alternatives in polymerization contraction stress management. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2004; 15 (3): 176-184.
Ferracane J. L. Buonocore Lecture. Placing dental composites--a stressful experience. Oper Dent. 2008; 33 (3): 247-257.
Dauvillier B. S., Aarnts M. P., Feilzer A. J. Developments in shrinkage control of adhesive restoratives. J Esthet Dent. 2000; 12 (6): 291-299.
Lee M. R.1, Cho B. H., Son H. H., Um C. M., Lee I. B. Influence of cavity dimension and restoration methods on the cusp deflection of premolars in composite restoration. Dent Mater. 2007; 23 (3): 288-295.
Abbas G., Fleming G. J., Harrington E., Shortall A. C., Burke F. J. Cuspal movement and microleakage in premolar teeth restored with a packable composite cured in bulk or in increments. J Dent. 2003; 31 (6): 437-444.
Rosatto C. M., Bicalho A. A., Veríssimo C., Bragança G. F., Rodrigues M. P., Tantbirojn D., Versluis A., Soares C. J. Mechanical properties, shrinkage stress, cuspal strain and fracture resistance of molars restored with bulk-fill composites and incremental filling technique. J Dent. 2015; 43 (12): 1519-1528.
Van Dijken J. W., Pallesen U. Posterior bulk-filled resin composite restorations: A 5 year randomized controlled clinical study. J Dent. 2016; 51: 29-35.
Heintze S. D., Monreal D., Peschke A. Marginal Quality of Class II Composite Restorations Placed in Bulk Compared to an Incremental Technique: Evaluation with SEM and Stereomicroscope. J Adhes Dent. 2015; 17 (2): 147-154.
Rauber G. B., Bernardon J. K., Vieira L. C., Maia H. P., Horn F., Roesler C. R. In Vitro Fatigue Resistance of Teeth Restored With Bulk Fill versus Conventional Composite Resin. Braz Dent J. 2016; 27 (4): 452-457.
Leprince J. G., Palin W. M., Vanacker J., Sabbagh J., Devaux J., Leloup G. Physico-mechanical characteristics of commercially available bulk-fill composites. J Dent. 2014; 42 (8): 993-1000.
Goracci C., Cadenaro M., Fontanive L., Giangrosso G., Juloski J., Vichi A., Ferrari F. Polymerization efficiency and flexural strength of low-stress restorative composites. Dent Mater. 2014; 30 (6): 688-694.
El-Damanhoury H., Platt J. Polymerization shrinkage stress kinetics and related properties of bulk-fill resin composites. Oper Dent. 2014; 39 (4): 374-382.
Li X., Pongprueksa P., Van Meerbeek B., De Munck J. Curing profile of bulk-fill resin-based composites. J Dent. 2015; 43 (6): 664-672.
Son S. A., Park J. K., Seo D. G., Ko C. C., Kwon Y. H. How light attenuation and filler content affect the microhardness and polymerization shrinkage and translucency of bulk-fill composites? Clin Oral Investig. 2017; 21 (2): 559-565.
Bucuta S., Ilie N. Light transmittance and micro-mechanical properties of bulk fill vs. conventional resin based composites. Clin Oral Investig. 2014; 18 (8): 1991-2000.
Alrahlah A., Silikas N., Watts D. C. Post-cure depth of cure of bulk fill dentalresin-composites. Dent Mater. 2014; 30 (2): 149-154.
Flury S., Hayoz S., Peutzfeldt A., Hüsler J., Lussi A. Depth of cure of resin composites: Is the ISO 4049 method suitable for bulk fill materials? Dent Mater. 2012; 28 (5): 521-528.
Yu P., Yap A., Wang X. Y. Degree of Conversion and Polymerization Shrinkage of Bulk-Fill Resin-Based Composites. Oper Dent. 2017; 42 (1): 82-89.
Lee Y. K. Influence of filler on the difference between the transmitted and reflected colors of experimental resin composites. Dent Mater. 2008; 24 (9): 1243-1247.
Ilie N., Bucuta S., Draenert M. Bulk-fill resin-based composites: an in vitro assessment of their mechanical performance. Oper Dent. 2013; 38 (6): 618-625.
Ilie N., Fleming G. J. In vitro comparison of polymerisation kinetics and the micro-mechanical properties of low and high viscosity giomers and RBC materials. J Dent. 2015; 43 (7): 814-822.
Sezinando A., Luque-Martinez I., Muñoz M. A., Reis A., Loguercio A. D., Perdigão J. Influence of a hydrophobic resin coating on the immediate and 6-month dentin bonding of three universal adhesives. Dent Mater. 2015; 31 (10): e236-246.
Hanabusa M., Mine A., Kuboki T., Momoi Y., Van Ende A., Van Meerbeek B., De Munck J. Bonding effectiveness of a new ‘multi-mode’ adhesive to enamel and dentine. J Dent. 2012; 40 (6): 475-484.
Frankenberger R., Lohbauer U., Roggendorf M. J., Naumann M., Taschner M. Selective enamel etching reconsidered: better than etch-and-rinse and self-etch? J Adhes Dent. 2008; 10 (5): 339-344.
Peumans M., De Munck J., Van Landuyt K. L., Poitevin A., Lambrechts P., Van Meerbeek B. Eight-year clinical evaluation of a 2-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective enamel etching. Dent Mater. 2010; 26 (12): 1176-1184.
Van Meerbeek B., Kanumilli P., De Munck J., Van Landuyt K., Lambrechts P., Peumans M. A randomized controlled study evaluating the effectiveness of a two-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective phosphoric-acid etching of enamel. Dent Mater. 2005; 21 (4): 375-383.
Rotta M., Bresciani P., Moura S. K., Grande R. H., Hilgert L. A., Baratieri L. N., Loguercio A. D., Reis A. Effects of phosphoric acid pretreatment and substitution of bonding resin on bonding effectiveness of self-etching systems to enamel. J Adhes Dent. 2007; 9 (6): 537-545.
Rosa W. L., Piva E., Silva A. F. Bond strength of universal adhesives: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2015; 43 (7) :765-776.
Marchesi G., Frassetto A., Mazzoni A., Apolonio F., Diolosà M., Cadenaro M., Di Lenarda R., Pashley D. H., Tay F., Breschi L. Adhesive performance of a multi-mode adhesive system: 1-year in vitro study. J Dent. 2014; 42 (5): 603-612.
Jang J. H., Lee M. G., Woo S. U., Lee C. O., Yi J. K., Kim D. S. Comparative study of the dentin bond strength of a new universal adhesive. Dent Mater J. 2016; 35 (4): 606-612.
Carvalho R. M., Chersoni S., Frankenberger R., Pashley D. H., Prati C., Tay F. R. A challenge to the conventional wisdom that simultaneous etching and resin infiltration always occurs in self-etch adhesives. Biomaterials. 2005; 26 (9): 1035-1042.
Van Meerbeek B., Yoshihara K., Yoshida Y., Mine A., De Munck J., Van Landuyt K. L. State of the art of self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater. 2011; 27 (1): 17-28.