Abstract
Introduction: Space maintainers play an important role in orthodontic treatments involving premolar extractions, especially in cases with bad occlusion and marked crowding. The orthodontist must know several options of anchoring and choose the best method that would fulfill the treatment objectives for that patient. Objective: To compare the effects of maximum anchors like the double transpalatal arch (double ATP) and the transpalatal arch and Nance button combination (transpalanance) as space maintainers during cuspids retraction in patients undergoing upper bicuspid extractions. Methods: A universe of 100 patients, aged 14-25 years, was selected from among the patients presenting to the Orthodontics Specialty Clinic of the posgraduate School Dr. José Apolo Pineda, Pilot School of Dentistry, University of Guayaquil during the years of 2017 and 2018. Totally, 26 patients were recruited, of whom 13 were placed on transpalanance and the other 13 on double ATP, prior to the extraction of their first upper bicuspid. Post-extraction spaces were measured and compared with post-retraction spaces of upper cuspids. Results: With an average of 4-5 mm, transpalanance maintained the greatest amount of space at the end of canine retraction. It is expected that the results obtained in this study will be useful to orthodontists, providing them with information regarding the most effective space maintainers for treatments with extractions. Conclusion: The maximum anchor that showed the greatest efficacy was transpalanance since it maintained a greater amount of space during its time of use.
References
Echandia, Giovanni Oberti, et al. Treatment alternative for the distalization of upper molars with a transpalatine bar anchored to a mini-implant. CES Journal Odontology, 2010, vol. 23, no 2, p. 73-78.
Rodriguez, E. 1,001 Tips in Orthodontics and its Secrets. Mexico: Amolca. 2007.
Pérez García, Lizandro Michel, et al. Use of mini implant in patient with asymmetric anchorage requirement. Presentation of case. Medical Gazette of Espirituana, 2013, vol. 15, no 3, p. 306-311.
ROMERO, M., et al. Loss of anchoring in patients treated with extraction of upper first premolars. Latin American Journal of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, 2007.
Echarri, P. Orthodontic treatment with extractions. Madrid-Spain: Ripano. 2010.
Rey, Diego; Oberti, Giovanni; Sierra, Angela. Removal of the first permanent molar as an alternative in the treatment of orthodontics (Extractions of first permanent molars as a choice of the orthodontic treatment). CES Dentistry, 2012, vol. 25, no 1, p. 44-51.
Uribe, G. Orthodontics Theory and Clinic, 2nd Edition. Medellin-Colombia: CIB Corporacion para Investigación Biologica. 2010.
Viglianisi, A. (October 2010). Effects of lingual arch used as space maintainer on mandibular arch dimension: A systematic review. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Volume 138, Issue 4.
Uribe, F.; Nanda, R. Treatment of Class II, Division 2 malocclusion in adults: biomechanical considerations. Journal of Clinical Orthodontics, 2003, vol. 37, no 11, p. 599-606.
Sayin, Seher, et al. Rapid canine distalization using distraction of the periodontal ligament: a preliminary clinical validation of the original technique. The Angle Orthodontist, 2004, vol. 74, no 3, p. 304-315.
Ordóñez, Cd Francisco Shamed Méndez, et al. Corrective Treatment of Bimaxillary Class I Moderate Dentoalveolar Protrusion: BimaxillaryDentoalveolarDistalization with Mini Implants. Mexican Journal of Orthodontics, 2018, vol. 6, no 2, p. 98-111.
Burstone C.J. Precision adjustement of the transpalatal lingual arc: computer arch form determination. Am.J.Orthod: 79: 115-133, 1981.
Romero, M. Gurrola, B. Mendoza, J. Casasa, A. 2007, Lost of anchoring in patients treated with extraction of upper first premolars. Latin American Journal of Orthodontics and Odontopediatrics "Ortodoncia.ws electronic edition October 2007. Available at: www.ortodoncia.ws.