Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences ISSN Impreso: 1659-1046 ISSN electrónico: 2215-3411

OAI: https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/Odontos/oai
Impact of Two Distinct Dental Anesthesia Simulation Models on the Perception of Learning by Students
PDF
HTML
EPUB

Keywords

Dental anesthesia simulation model; Dental education; Simulation based learning; Perception of learning; Likert scale.
Modelo de simulación de anestesia dental; Educación en estomatología; Aprendizaje basado en simulación; Percepción del aprendizaje; Escala de Likert.

How to Cite

Merino-Parra DDS, J., Madrazo-Meneses DDS, R. E., Komabayashi DDS, MSc, PhD, T., & Cerda-Cristerna DDS, MSc, PhD, B. I. (2019). Impact of Two Distinct Dental Anesthesia Simulation Models on the Perception of Learning by Students. Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences, 22(1), 103–112. https://doi.org/10.15517/ijds.2019.38481

Abstract

We evaluated an infiltration anesthesia simulation model (IAM) and a conduction anesthesia simulation model (CAM) on the perception of learning by Mexican dental students. Our aim was to compare the perception of learning by dental students trained with two distinct dental anesthesia simulation model (DASM) with dental students who were not trained with a DASM. 3 groups participated in the study: G1 (N=12 students) learned to block the mental nerve (BMN) by participating in a theoretical lecture (stage 1) and a clinical demonstration (stage 2); G2 (N=12 students) learned the BMN by participating in the stage 1, stage 2, and training with the CAM; G3 (N=12 students) learned the BMN by participating in the stage 1, stage 2, and training with the IAM. The groups performed the BMN in a clinical exercise. Working-time of all participants was timed. Perception of learning for all participants was evaluated with a 5-point Likert Scale. The results showed that statistically significant differences were found between score of G1 and score of G2 and score of G3 (P<0.05).  No statistically significant differences were found between scores of G2 and scores of G3. G1, G2 and G3 showed an average working-time of 12:42 minutes, 9.75 minutes and 8:03 minutes, respectively (P<0.05). We concluded that the IAM and CAM showed a positive impact on the perception of learning, and the students trained with the IAM showed a shorter working time compared with the students trained with the CAM.

https://doi.org/10.15517/ijds.2019.38481
PDF
HTML
EPUB

References

Lopez-Cabrera C., Hernandez-Rivas E. J., Komabayashi T., Galindo-Reyes E. L., Tallabs-Lopez D., Cerda-Cristerna B. I. Positive influence of a dental anaesthesia simulation model on the perception of learning by Mexican dental students. Eur J Dent Educ 2017; 21 (4): e142-7.

Brand H. S., Kuin D., Baart J. A. A survey of local anaesthesia education in European dental schools. Eur J Dent Educ 2008;12 (2): 85-8.

Brand H. S., Tan L. L., van der Spek S. J., Baart J. A. European dental students' opinions on their local anaesthesia education. Eur J Dent Educ 2011; 15 (1): 47-52.

Chandrasekaran B., Cugati N., Kumaresan R. Dental Students' Perception and Anxiety Levels during their First Local Anesthetic Injection. Malays J Med Sci 2014; 21 (6): 45-51.

Rosenberg M., Orr D. L., 2nd, Starley E. D., Jensen D. R. Student-to-student local anesthesia injections in dental education: moral, ethical, and legal issues. J Dent Educ 2009; 73 (1): 127-32.

Lee J. S., Graham R., Bassiur J. P., Lichtenthal R. M. Evaluation of a Local Anesthesia Simulation Model with Dental Students as Novice Clinicians. J Dent Educ 2015; 79 (12):1411-7.

Brand H. S., Baart J. A., Maas N. E., Bachet I. Effect of a training model in local anesthesia teaching. J Dent Educ 2010; 74 (8): 876-9.

Marei H. F., Al-Jandan B. A. Simulation-based local anaesthesia teaching enhances learning outcomes. Eur J Dent Educ 2013; 17 (1): e44-8.

Stanley F. Malamed. Handbook of Local Anesthesia. 6th Edition, pp. 245-47. Maryland Heights, Missouri. Elsevier-Mosby; 2013.

Newell K. M., Liu Y. T., Mayer-Kress G. Time scales, difficulty/skill duality, and the dynamics of motor learning. Adv Exp Med Biol 2009; 629: 457-76.

Cohen H. P., Cha B. Y., Spangberg L. S. Endodontic anesthesia in mandibular molars: a clinical study. J Endod 1993; 19 (7): 370-3.

Learner’s Dictionary Merriam-Webster. Accesed 16th May 2019. www.learnersdictionary.com

Norman G. Likert scales, levels of measurement and the "laws" of statistics. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2010; 15 (5): 625-32.

Carifio J., Perla R. C. Ten commons missunderstandings, misconceptions, persistent myths and urban legends about Likert Scales and Likert response formats and their antidotes. J Soc Sci 2017; 3 (3): 106-116.

Hargreaves K. M., Keiser K. Local anesthetic failure in endodontics: Mechanisms and Management. Endod Topics 2002; 1 (1): 26-39.

Nusstein J. M., Reader A., Drum M. Local anesthesia strategies for the patient with a "hot" tooth. Dent Clin North Am 2010; 54 (2): 237-47.

Noguera-Gonzalez D., Cerda-Cristerna B. I., Chavarria-Bolanos D., Flores-Reyes H., Pozos-Guillen A. Efficacy of preoperative ibuprofen on the success of inferior alveolar nerve block in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis: a randomized clinical trial. Int Endod J 2013; 46 (11): 1056-62.

Perry S., Bridges S. M., Burrow M. F. A review of the use of simulation in dental education. Simul Healthc 2015; 10 (1): 31-7.

Comments

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.