Kent B. E., Lewis B. G., Wilson A. D. Glass Ionomer Cement Formulations: I. The Preparation of Novel Fluoroaluminosilicate Glasses High in Fluorine. J Dent Res. 1979; 58 (6): 1607-19.
ten Cate J. M., van Duinen R. N. B. Hypermineralization of Dentinal Lesions Adjacent to Glass-ionomer Cement Restorations. J. Dent Res. 1995; 74 (6): 1266-71.
Hara A. T., Queiroz C. S., Freitas P. M., Giannini M., Serra M. C., Cury J. A. Fluoride release and secondary caries inhibition by adhesive systems on root dentine. Eur J Oral Sci. 2005; 113 (3): 245-50.
Anusavice K., Phillips R. Phillips’ Science of Dental Materials. 11th ed. St. Louis, USA; W.B. Saunders; 2003.
Hewlett E. R., Mount G. J. Glass ionomers in contemporary restorative dentistry a clinical update. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2003; 31 (6): 483-92.
Khoroushi M., Keshani F. A review of glass-ionomers: From conventional glass-ionomer to bioactive glass-ionomer. Dent Res J. (Isfahan). 2013; 10 (4): 411-20.
Kavaloglu Cildir S., Sandalli N. Compressive strength, surface roughness, fluoride release and recharge of four new fluoride-releasing fissure sealants. Dent Mater J. 2007; 26 (3): 335-41.
Vermeersch G., Leloup G., Vreven J. Fluoride release from glass-ionomer cements, compomers and resin composites. J Oral Rehabil. 2001; 28 (1): 26-32.
Mjör I. A., Toffenetti F. Secondary caries: a literature review with case reports. Quintessence Int. 2000; 31 (3): 165-79.
D’Arcangelo C., Zarow M., De Angelis F., Vadini M., Paolantonio M., Giannoni M., et al. Five-year retrospective clinical study of indirect composite restorations luted with a light-cured composite in posterior teeth. Clin Oral Investig. 2014; 18 (2): 615-24.
Tam L. E., Chan G. P., Yim D. In vitro caries inhibition effects by conventional and resin-modified glass-ionomer restorations. Oper Dent. 1997; 22 (1): 4-14.
McCabe J. F., Walls A. Applied dental materials. 9th ed. Chicago, USA: Blackwell Pub; 2008.
Savarino L., Breschi L., Tedaldi M., Ciapetti G., Tarabusi C., Greco M., et al. Ability of restorative and fluoride releasing materials to prevent marginal dentine demineralization. Biomaterials. 2004; 25 (6): 1011-7.
Burke F. M., Ray N. J., McConnell R. J. Fluoride-containing restorative materials. Int Dent J. 2006; 56 (1): 33-43.
Pellizzari V., Michels A., Luiz S., de Souza E., Tabchoury C., Rached R. Fluoride Ion Release of Self-Adhesive Resin Cements and Their Potential to Inhibit In Situ Enamel and Dentin Demineralization. Oper Dent. 2017; 42 (5): 548-58.
Scheibe K.G.B.A., Almeida K.G.B., Medeiros I. S., Costa J. F., Alves C.M.C. Effect of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of microhybrid composites. J Appl Oral Sci. 2009; 17 (1): 21-6.
Wessel S. W., Chen Y., Maitra A., van den Heuvel E. R., Slomp A. M., Busscher H. J., et al. Adhesion forces and composition of planktonic and adhering oral microbiomes. J Dent Res 2014; 93: 84‑8.
Aykent F., Yondem I., Ozyesil A. G., Gunal S. K., Avunduk M. C., Ozkan S. Effect of different finishing techniques for restorative materials on surface roughness and bacterial adhesion. J Prosthet Dent 2010; 103: 221‑7.
McConnell M. D., Liu Y., Nowak A. P., Pilch S., Masters J. G., Composto R. J. Bacterial plaque retention on oral hard materials: Effect of surface roughness, surface composition, and physisorbed polycarboxylate. J Biomed Mater Res A 2010; 92: 1518‑27.
Kimyai S., Lotfipour F., Pourabbas R., Sadr A., Nikazar S., Milani M. Effect of two rophylaxis methods on adherence of Streptococcus mutans to microfilled composite resin and giomer surfaces. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2011; 16: e561‑7.
Heintze S. D., Forjanic M., Ohmiti K., RoussonV. Surface deterioration of dental materials after simulated toothbrushing in relation to brushing time and load. Dent Mater 2010; 26: 306‑19.
Jost-Brinkmann P. G. Effect of air polishing on the fluoride release of (resin-modified) glass ionomer cements and of a polyacid-modified composite resin. Clin Oral Investig. 1998; 2 (2): 91-5.
Bayrak G. D., Sandalli N., Selvi-Kuvvetli S., Topcuoglu N., Kulekci G. Effect of two different polishing systems on fluoride release, surface roughness and bacterial adhesion of newly developed restorative materials. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2017; 29 (6): 424-34.
Mousavinasab S. M., Meyers I. Fluoride release by glass ionomer cements, compomer and giomer. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2009; 6 (2): 75-81.
Neelakantan P., John S., Anand S., Sureshbabu N., Subbarao C. Fluoride Release From a New Glass-ionomer Cement. Oper Dent. 2011; 36 (1): 80-5.
Rothwell M., Anstice H. M., Pearson GJ. The uptake and release of fluoride by ion-leaching cements after exposure to toothpaste. J Dent. 1998; 26 (7): 591-7.
Hattab F. N., el-Mowafy O. M., Salem N. S., el-Badrawy W. A. An in vivo study on the release of fluoride from glass-ionomer cement. Quintessence Int. 1991; 22 (3): 221-4.
Delbem A. C. B., Pedrini D., França J. G. M., Machado T. M. Fluoride release/recharge from restorative materials effect of fluoride gels and time. Oper Dent. 2005; 30 (6): 690-5.
Tay F. R., Pashley E. L., Huang C., Hashimoto M., Sano H., Smales R. J., et al. The Glass-ionomer Phase in Resin-based Restorative Materials. J. Dent Res. 2001; 80 (9): 1808-12.
Yap A. U. J., Tham S. Y., Zhu L. Y., Lee H. K. Short-term fluoride release from various aesthetic restorative materials. Oper Dent. 2002; 27 (3): 259-65.
Ehrmann E., Medioni E., Brulat-Bouchard N. Finishing and polishing effects of multiblade burs on the surface texture of 5 resin composites: microhardness and roughness testing. Restor Dent Endod. 2019; 44 (1).
Ozel E., Korkmaz Y., Attar N., Karabulut E. Effect of one-step polishing systems on surface roughness of different flowable restorative materials. Dent Mater J. 2008; 27 (6): 755-64.
Pala K., Tekçe N., Tuncer S., Serim M. E., Demirci M. Evaluation of the surface hardness, roughness, gloss and color of composites after different finishing/polishing treatments and thermocycling using a multitechnique approach. Dent Mater J. 2016; 35 (2): 278-89.
Bollen C. M., Lambrechts P., Quirynen M. Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: a review of the literature. Dent Mater. 1997; 13 (4): 258-69.
McKnight-Hanes C., Whitford G. M. Fluoride Release from Three Glass Ionomer Materials and the Effects of Varnishing with or without Finishing. Caries Res. 1992; 26 (5): 345-50.
- Abstract viewed - 879 times
- PDF downloaded - 226 times
- HTML downloaded - 128 times
- EPUB downloaded - 101 times
© , 2019
Soner Şişmanoğlu DDS, PhD
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Altınbaş University, Istanbul, Turkey
Burak Gümüştaş DDS, PhD
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey
Zuhal Yıldırım-Bilmez DDS, PhD
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, Istanbul, Turkey
How to Cite
Effect of Polishing Systems on Fluoride Release and Surface Roughness of Different Restorative Materials
Vol 22 No 1 (2020): Odovtos-International Journal of Dental Sciences
Published: Sep 27, 2019
Secondary caries is an important factor in the replacement of the restorations, and it is thought that fluoride-releasing materials may prevent this problem. Furthermore, the fluoride release of the materials may be increased by polishing process. Available knowledge about the effect of polishing systems (PS) on the fluoride release of materials is limited. Therefore, this study was conducted to evaluate the effect of PS on the fluoride release of fluoride-containing materials. Restorative materials were divided into 6 groups: Fuji IX GP, Fuji II, Dyract XP, Beautifil II, Beautifil-Bulk, and Filtek Ultimate. Each group was also divided into four subgroups: Mylar strip, Sof-Lex Discs, Sof-Lex Diamond, and OneGloss. Fluoride release was determined using a fluoride ion-selective electrode. Surface roughness was evaluated with a profilometer. Two-way repeated measure and one-way ANOVA tests were used for statistical analysis. The initial rapid fluoride release was observed only in Fuji IX. The PS increased the fluoride release of Fuji IX and Fuji II and Dyract XP materials while reducing the fluoride release of resin-based materials. The highest surface roughness values were obtained with OneGloss. Further, a significant relationship between fluoride release and surface roughness was found. The polishing provides an increase in fluoride release, especially in glass-ionomer-based materials. This article revealed that there is a relationship between fluoride release and surface roughness. Proper PS must be chosen according to the material to provide the best clinical benefits in terms of fluoride release and surface roughness.