Keywords
Prótesis dentales fijas; Implantosoportadas; De arcada completa; Cementadas; Cr-Co; Resina; Composite.
How to Cite
Abstract
Full-arch implant-supported fixed dental prostheses, an implant-supported prosthesis, which the patient must carefully manage in home oral hygiene procedures, is the fixed alternative to a mucosal-supported or implant-anchored prosthesis. Clinically, the execution of this rehabilitation requires four implants for the lower jaw and six implants for the upper jaw. The aim of the present study is to verify the survival-rate of implants for implant-fixed prostheses in the edentulous upper jaw. This retrospective study was carried out on patients who received an upper full-arch fixed prostheses on six implants for rehabilitation. A total of 36 patients were included and evaluated from a clinical and radiographical point of view. The follow-up period in which the data were collected on the upper full-arch is between 60 and 84 months. A total of 232 implants were inserted and monitored in this period. Clinical and radiographic evaluations were carried out on all 232 implants, with constant re-evaluation. The total implant survival rate is 93.1%, a value which is similar to previous studies already published on the topic. There were few prosthetic complications, mainly the fracture of anterior prosthetic teeth. Most of these full-arch, which as antagonist had another previously made full-arch implant-supported fixed dental prostheses or overdenture on four or overdenture on two implants, achieves good results in this study at 84 months.
References
Roberto, L.L.; Crespo, T.S.; Monteiro-Junior, R.S.; Martins, A.M.; De Paula, A.M.; Ferreira, E.F.; Haikal, D.S. Sociodemographic determinants of edentulism in the elderly population: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gerodontology 2019, 36: 325-337. https://doi.org/10.1111/ger.12430
Misch C.M. Editorial: Managing the terminal dentition: are immediate implant teeth a panacea? Int J Oral Implantol (Berl). 2020; 13 (1): 3-5.
Reda, R. Zanza, A. Di Nardo, D. Bellanova, V. Xhajanka, E. Testarelli, L. Implant Survival Rate and Prosthetic Complications of OT Equator Retained Maxillary Overdenture: A Cohort Study. Prosthesis 2022, 4: 730-738. https://doi.org/10.3390/prosthesis4040057
Feine, J.S.; Carlsson, G.E.; Awad, M.A.; Chehade, A.; Duncan, W.J.; Gizani, S.; Head, T.; Heydecke, G.; Lund, J.P.; MacEntee, M.; et al. The McGill consensus statement on overdentures. Mandibular two-implant overdentures as first choice standard of care for edentulous patients. Gerodontology 2002, 19: 3-4.
Papaspyridakos, P.; Chen, C.J.; Chuang, S.K.; Weber, H.P.; Gallucci, G.O. A systematic review of biologic and technical complications with fixed implant rehabilitations for edentulous patients. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implant. 2012, 27: 102-110.
Storelli, S.; Del Fabbro, M.; Scanferla, M.; Palandrani, G.; Romeo, E. Implant-supported cantilevered fixed dental rehabilitations in fully edentulous patients: Systematic review of the literature. Part II. Clin. Oral Implant. Res. 2018, 29 (Suppl. S18): 275-294.
Gallardo Y.N.R., da Silva-Olivio I.R., Gonzaga L., Sesma N., Martin W. A Systematic Review of Clinical Outcomes on Patients Rehabilitated with Complete-Arch Fixed Implant-Supported Prostheses According to the Time of Loading. J. Prosthodont. 2019, 28: 958-968.
Storelli S., Del Fabbro M., Scanferla M., Palandrani G., Romeo E. Implant supported cantilevered fixed dental rehabilitations in partially edentulous patients: Systematic review of the literature. Part I. Clin. Oral Implant. Res. 2018, 29 (Suppl. S18): 253-274.
Reda R., Zanza A., Cicconetti A., Bhandi S., Guarnieri R., Testarelli L., Di Nardo D. A Systematic Review of Cementation Techniques to Minimize Cement Excess in Cement-Retained Implant Restorations. Methods Protoc. 2022 Jan 17; 5 (1): 9. doi: 10.3390/mps5010009
Reda, R. Zanza, A. Bellanova, V. Patil, S. Bhandi, S. Di Nardo, D. Testarelli, L. Zinc Oxide Non-Eugenol Cement versus Resinous Cement on Single Implant Restoration: A Split-Mouth Study. J. Compos. Sci. 2023, 7: 128. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs7030128
Reda, R.; Zanza, A.; Galli, M.; De Biase, A.; Testarelli, L.; Di Nardo, D. Applications and Clinical Behavior of BioHPP in Prosthetic Dentistry: A Short Review. J. Compos. Sci. 2022, 6: 90. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs6030090
Guarnieri R., Miccoli G., Reda R., Mazzoni A., Di Nardo D., Testarelli L. Sulcus fluid volume, IL-6, and Il-1b concentrations in periodontal and peri-implant tissues comparing machined and laser-microtextured collar/abutment surfaces during 12 weeks of healing: A split-mouth RCT. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2022 Jan; 33 (1): 94-104. doi: 10.1111/clr.13868
Guarnieri R., Reda R., Zanza A., Miccoli G., Nardo D.D., Testarelli L. Can Peri-Implant Marginal Bone Loss Progression and a-MMP-8 Be Considered Indicators of the Subsequent Onset of Peri-Implantitis? A 5-Year Study. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Oct 26; 12 (11): 2599. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12112599
Schwarz F., Ramanauskaite A. It is all about peri-implant tissue health. Periodontol 2000. 2022 Feb; 88 (1): 9-12. doi: 10.1111/prd.12407
Guarnieri R., Reda R., Di Nardo D., Miccoli G., Zanza A., Testarelli L. Clinical, radiographic, and biochemical evaluation of two-piece versus one-piece single implants with a laser-microgrooved collar surface after 5 years of functional loading. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2022 Oct; 24 (5): 676-682. doi: 10.1111/cid.13118
Thoma D.S., Naenni N., Figuero E., Hämmerle C.H.F., Schwarz F., Jung R.E., Sanz-Sánchez I. Effects of soft tissue augmentation procedures on peri-implant health or disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Mar; 29 Suppl 15: 32-49. doi: 10.1111/clr.13114
Guarnieri R., Reda R., Di Nardo D., Miccoli G., Zanza A., Testarelli L. In Vitro Direct and Indirect Cytotoxicity Comparative Analysis of One Pre-Hydrated versus One Dried Acellular Porcine Dermal Matrix. Materials (Basel). 2022 Mar 5; 15 (5): 1937. doi:10.3390/ma15051937
Parel, S. Removable and Fixed Fully Edentulous Treatment Options for the Aging Patient. Compend. Contin. Educ. Dent. 2018, 39: 448-453.
Tallarico M., Ortensi L., Martinolli M., Casucci A., Ferrari E., Malaguti G., Montanari M., Scrascia R., Vaccaro G., Venezia P., Xhanari E., Rodriguez Y., Baena R. Multicenter Retrospective Analysis of Implant Overdentures Delivered with Different Design and Attachment Systems: Results Between One and 17 Years of Follow-Up. Dent J (Basel). 2018 Dec 11; 6 (4): 71. doi: 10.3390/dj6040071
Li Q.L., Yao M.F., Cao R.Y., Zhao K., Wang X.D. Survival Rates of Splinted and Nonsplinted Prostheses Supported by Short Dental Implants (≤8.5 mm): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Prosthodont. 2022 Jan; 31 (1): 9-21. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13402
Mills S. How successful are maxillary implant-retained overdentures on two or four implants? Evid Based Dent. 2021 Dec; 22 (4): 146-147. doi: 10.1038/s41432-021-0221-z. Epub 2021 Dec 16
Kappel S., Klotz A.L., Eberhard L., Lorenzo Bermejo J., Rammelsberg P., Giannakopoulos N.N. Maxillary implant overdentures on two or four implants. A prospective randomized cross-over clinical trial of implant and denture success and survival. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2021 Sep; 32 (9): 1061-1071. doi: 10.1111/clr.13800
Verri, F.R.; Pellizzer, E.P.; Rocha, E.P.; Pereira, J.A. Influence of length and diameter of implants associated with distal extension removable partial dentures. Implant. Dent. 2007: 16, 270-280.
Kang, S.H.; Kim, S.K.; Heo, S.J.; Koak, J.Y. Survival rate and clinical evaluation of the implants in implant assisted removable partial dentures: Surveyed crown and overdenture. J. Adv. Prosthodont. 2020, 12: 239-249.
Mao Z., Lee C.T., He S.M., Zhang S., Bao J., Xie Z.G. Buccal bone dimensional changes at immediate implant sites in the maxillary esthetic zone within a 4-12-month follow-up period: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2021 Dec; 23 (6): 883-903. doi: 10.1111/cid.13051
Okumura N., Stegaroiu R., Kitamura E., Kurokawa K., Nomura S. Influence of maxillary cortical bone thickness, implant design and implant diameter on stress around implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Prosthodont Res. 2010 Jul; 54 (3): 133-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2009.12.004
Grossmann Y., Finger I.M., Block M.S. Indications for splinting implant restorations. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005 Nov; 63 (11): 1642-52. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2005.05.149
Ma Y., Al-Radhi R.Y.Z., Jiang L., Yu H. Does Splinting the Direct Copings Increase the Impression Accuracy of Two-Unit Nonparallel Implant Restorations? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2022 Jul-Aug; 37 (4): 653-659. doi: 10.11607/jomi.9577
Guichet D.L., Yoshinobu D., Caputo A.A. Effect of splinting and interproximal contact tightness on load transfer by implant restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 2002 May; 87 (5): 528-35. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2002.124589
French D., Naito M., Linke B. Interproximal contact loss in a retrospective cross-sectional study of 4325 implants: Distribution and incidence and the effect on bone loss and peri-implant soft tissue. J Prosthet Dent. 2019 Aug; 122 (2): 108-114. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.11.011
Comments
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2024 CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0