Use of molecular markers and gamete selection for simultaneous improvement of multiple characters in the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) for middle America and the Caribbean.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15517/am.v9i1.24606Abstract
The objective is to describe the basic requirements and alternative selection methods for simultaneous improvement of maximum number of agronomic characters in the shortest time possible. This strategy includes: (1) deterrnination of the importance and priorities of bean production problems in the region, (2) definition of objectives and priorities of breeding, (3) identification and use of reliable parental sources considered to be donors of necessary genes, (4) development of multipleparent crosses with large number of pollinations to produce sufficient seed of each cross, (5) evaluation and selection for currently available markers (e.g., for zabrotes, bean common mosaic, bean golden mosaic, rust, anthracnose, apion, common bacterial blight, etc.) from hybridization, (6) alternative selection methods such as gamete selection and single seed descendants (GS-SSD), gamete and pedigree selection using markers (GS-PUM), gamete selection and agronomic evaluation and selection of families in early generations (GS-AEF), or a combination and integration of the GS-PUM and GS-AEF methods; and (7) seeking genuine and direct collaboration and integration in all activities of researchers from different disciplines, institutions, countries and the entire region at key sites foro reliable evaluation of bean nurseries in order to carry out simultaneous selection for a maximum number of agronomic traits.
Downloads
References
ADAM-BLANDON, A.E; SEVIGNAC, M.; DRON, M.; BANNEROT, H. 1994. Agenetic map of common bean to localize specific resistance gene against anthracnose. Genome 37:915-924.
BEEBE, S.; CARDONA, c.; DÍAZ, O.; RODRÍGUEZ, E; MANCIA, E.; AJQUEJAY, S. 1993. Development of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) lines resistant to the pod weevil, Apion godmani Wagner, in Central America. Euphytica 69:83-88.
BEEBE, S.E.; OCHOA, l.; SKROCH, P.; NIENHUlS, J.; TIVANG, J. 1995. Genetic diversity among common bean breeding lines developed for Central America. Crop Sci. 35:1178-1183.
BRIM, C.A. 1966. A modified pedigree method of selection in soybeans. Crop Sci. 6:220.
GU, W.K.; WEEDEN, N.E; ZHU, J.Q.; WALLACE, D.H. 1994. Identification of a DNA marker for Hr, a gene that interacts with ppd to confer extreme photoperiod sensitivity in common bean. Annu. Rpt. Bean Improv. Coop.37:125-126.
HALEY, S.D.; AFANADOR, L.; KELLY, J.D. 1994. Identification and application of a random amplified polymorphic DNA marker for the I gene (Potyvirus resistance) in common bean. Phytopathology 84:157-160.
HALEY, S.D.; MIKLAS, P.N.; STAVELY, JR; BYRUM, J.; KELLY, J.D. 1993. Identification of RAPD markers linked to a major rust resistance gene block in common bean. Theor. Appl. Genet. 86:505-512.
JOHNSON, E.; MIKLAS, P.N.; STAVELY, J.R.; MARTÍ- NEZ-CRUZADO, J.C. 1995. Coupling and repulsion phase RAPDs for marker assisted selection of PI 181996 rust resistance in common bean. Theor. Appl. Genet. 90:659-660.
JUNG, G.; COYNE, D.P.; SKROCH, P.w.; NIENHUlS, J.; ARNAUD-SANTANA, E.; BOKOSI, J.; ARIYARATHNE, H.M.; STEADMAN, J.R. 1996. Molecular markers associated with plant architecture and resistance to common blight, web blight and rust in common bean. J. Amer. Soco Hort. Sci. 121:794-803.
KELLY, J.D.; MIKLAS, P.N. 1997. The role of molecular markers in breeding for qualitative and quantitative traits of common bean. In: S.P. Singh and O. Voysest (eds.). Proceedings of "Taller de Mejoramiento de frijol para el Siglo XXI": Bases para una estrategia para América Latina. CIAT, Cali, Colombia (in press).
MIKLAS, P.N.; AFANADOR, L.; KELLY, J.D. 1996. Recombination facilitated RAPD marker assisted selection for disease resistance in common bean. Crop Sci. 36:86-90.
MIKLAS, P.N.; STAVELY, J.R.; KELLY, J.D. 1993. Identification and potential use of a molecular marker for rust resistance in common bean. Theor. Appl. Genet. 85:745-749.
NODARI, R.O.; TSAI, S.M.; GUZMAN, P.; GILBERTSON, R.L.; GEPTS, P. 1993. Toward an integrated linkage map of common bean. III. Mapping genetic factors controlling host-bacteria interactions. Genetics 134: 341-350.
SINGH, S.P. 1994. Gamete selection for simultaneous improvement of multiple traits in common bean. Crop Sci. 34:352-355.
SINGH, S.P.; URREA, C.A. 1.995. Inter- and intraracial hybridization and selection for seed yield in early generations of common bean. Euphytica 81: 131-137.
TERÁN, H.; SINGH, S.P. 1997. Pruebas de rendimiento de frijol común en generaciones tempranas. Resúmenes XLIII Reunión Anual PCCMCA, Panamá. p.94.
URREA, C.A.; MIKLAS, P.N.; BEAVER, J.S.; RILEY, R.H. 1996. A codominant randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) marker useful for indirect selection of bean golden mosaic virus resistance in common bean. J. Amer. Soco Hort. Sci. 121:1035-1039.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
1. Proposed policy for open access journals
Authors who publish in this journal accept the following conditions:
a. Authors retain the copyright and assign to the journal the right to the first publication, with the work registered under the attribution, non-commercial and no-derivative license from Creative Commons, which allows third parties to use what has been published as long as they mention the authorship of the work and upon first publication in this journal, the work may not be used for commercial purposes and the publications may not be used to remix, transform or create another work.
b. Authors may enter into additional independent contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (e.g., including it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book) provided that they clearly indicate that the work was first published in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to publish their work on the Internet (e.g. on institutional or personal pages) before and during the review and publication process, as it may lead to productive exchanges and faster and wider dissemination of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).