Estimación de varianzas genéticas en maíz a partir de líneas S1 y S2
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15517/am.v3i0.25198Abstract
The analysis of lines S-l and S-2 and the regression of the measurements of the S-2 on their corresponding S-l were used to estimate the existing genetic variability in a Nebraska Stiff Stalk Synthetic (NSS) corn population at two localities, Mead and Lincoln, Nebraska-USA. A significant genetic variability was found in NSS for grain yield, days to blooming, ear and plant height, grain humidity and lodging percentage. The S-2 lines showed more frequent interaction of genotypes x environment than their S-l. In the wide sense, the heritability for the yield calculated by the analysis of variance of S-2 lines was larger than the one based on the regression of the S-2 on S-l (60 and 42%, respectively). Eight models, originated from Cockerham (1983), were used to identify the existing types of genetic variabilities. The inverse matrix method was used to estimate the parameters of genetic variability when the used co-variances gave a non-singular square matrix. The generalized inverse method o Moore-Penrose was used when the models showed a rectangular matrix. Usually, the best model was the one which estimated the additive variance only. Often times, no consistent covariance estimates were obtained among additive and dominant homocygotic (D-1) effects. For it, we could not infer to what the S-l family selection effect could be on the behavior of the resulting line crosses. The expected genetic gain per selection cycle for yield of S-2 families was 11.4%.
Downloads
References
COCKERHAM, C.C. 1961. Implications of genetic variances in a hybrid breeding program. Crop. Sci. 1:47-52.
COCKERHAM, C.C. 1963. Estimation of genetic variances. In Statistical Genetics and Plant Breeding. Ed. by W.D. Hanson, H.F. Robinson. NAS-NRC. No. 982, pp. 53-94.
COCKERHAM, C.C. 1983. Covariance of relatives from seldfertilization. Crop. Sci. 23:1177-1180.
COORS, J.G. 1988. Responde to four cyc1es of combined halfsib and S1 family selection in maize. Crop Sci 28:891-896.
DUDLEY, J.W.; MOLL, R.H. 1969. Interpretation and use of estimates of heritability and genetic variances in plant breeding. Crop. Sci. 9:257-262.
FALCONER, D.S. 1981. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. 2nd Ed. Longman: New York.
HALLAUER, AR.; MIRANDA, J.B. 1988. Quantitative Genetics in Maize Breeding. 2nd Ed. ISU Press: Ames.
HORNER, T. W.; WEBER, C.W. 1956. Theoretical and experimental study of self-fertilizae populations, Biometrics 12:404-414.
MOLL, R.H.; SMITH, O.S. 1971. Genetic variances and selection responses in an advanced generation of a hybrid of widely divergent populations of maize. Crop. Sci. 21:387-391.
ODHIAMBO, M.D.; COMPTON, W.A. 1989. Five cyc1es of replicated S1 vs. reciprocal full-sib index selection in maize. Crop. Sci. 29:314-319.
RAO, C.R.; MlTRA, S.K. 1971. Generalized Inverse of Matrices and its Aplications. John Wiley & Sons: New York.
SMlTH, J.D.; KINMAN, M.L 1965. The use of parent-offspring regression as a estimator of heritability. Crop. Sci. 4:595-596.
TANNER, AH.; SMITH,O.S. 1987. Comparison of half-sib and S1 recurrent selection in the Krug yellow Dent maize populations. Crop. Sci. 27:509-513.
WEST, D.R. 1978. Indirect Response of S1 per se and Reciprocal Full-Sib Selection to Plant Populations Density in Corn. PhD Thesis, Univ. of Nebraska-Lincoln.
WEST, D.R.; COMTON,W.A.; THOMAS, M.A. 1980. A comparison of replicated S1 per se vs. reciprocal full-sib index selection in corn Crop. Sci. 20:35-42.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
1. Proposed policy for open access journals
Authors who publish in this journal accept the following conditions:
a. Authors retain the copyright and assign to the journal the right to the first publication, with the work registered under the attribution, non-commercial and no-derivative license from Creative Commons, which allows third parties to use what has been published as long as they mention the authorship of the work and upon first publication in this journal, the work may not be used for commercial purposes and the publications may not be used to remix, transform or create another work.
b. Authors may enter into additional independent contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (e.g., including it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book) provided that they clearly indicate that the work was first published in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to publish their work on the Internet (e.g. on institutional or personal pages) before and during the review and publication process, as it may lead to productive exchanges and faster and wider dissemination of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).