Evaluación de pentacloronitrobenceno (PCNB) en el control de la pudrición radicular cusada por Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn en frijol común (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)

Authors

  • Sergio Pichardo Guido ISCA-SLU. Nicaragua

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15517/am.v1i0.25329

Keywords:

Control químico.

Abstract

This experiment was conducted at “La Compañía”, Estación Experimental del Instituto Superior de Ciencias Agropecuarias (ISCA), which is located in the department of Carazo, Nicaragua. The trial was conducted during the months of June through September, 1987 with the following objectives: 1) To determine the appropiate rate of pentachloronitrobenzene (PCNB) for control of Rhizoctonia solani in common beans, 2) To evaluate the effect of mixing PCNB and “ Metalaxyl” on grain yield of common beans, 3) To determine yield reduction percentages caused by R. solani in common beans and 4) To select the best common bean variety in this experiment relative to the defined treatments. The results demonstrated that PCNB applied at a rate of 6.81 kg/ha was 3 % higher than the check and 12% higher than the highest rate of PCNB (11.36 kg/ha). The variety “Revolución 84” provided the highest yields compared to other entries.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ABAWI, G.S. 1986. Root diseases of beans and their control strategies. Seminarios Internos, CIAT, Cali, Colombia.

ANDERSON, N.A. 1977. Evaluation of the Rhizoctonia complex in relation to seedling blight of flax. Plant Dis. Reptr. 61:140-142.

__________,1982. The genetic and pathology of Rhizoctonia solani. Ann. Rev. Phytopathol. 20:329-347.

ARMDT, C.H. 1953. Evaluation of fungicides protectants of cotton seedlings from infection by Rhizoctonia solani. Plant Dis. ReptT. 37: 397-399.

BAKER,K.F. 1970. Types of Rhizoctonia diseases and their occurrence in: Rhizoctonia solani, Biology and Path, H.F. 1981. Root tot resistence in common bean germplasm of Latin America origen. Plant Dis. 65:485-489.

BRISTOW, P.R.; KATAN, J. 1970. Protection from Rhizoctonia solani by PCNB acumulated in plants. (Abstract). Phythopethology 60: 1256.

________; LOCKWOOD, J.L 1973. Control of Rhizoctonia solani by Pentachloronitrobenzene Accumulated from soil by bean plants. Phytopathology 63:808-813.

BRUGGEN, A. H.C.; WHALEN, C.H.; ANESON, P.A. 1986. Effects of inoculum level of Rhizoctonia solani an emergence, plant development, and yield of dry beans. phytopathology 76:869-873.

CARDOSO, J.E.-, ECHANDI, E. 1987. Biological control of Rhizoctonia root rot of snap bean with binucleate Rhizoctonia - like fungi. Plant Disease. 71:167-170.

DEKKER, J.; GEORGOPOULOS, S.G. 1982. Fungicide resistance in crop protection. Center of Agricultural Publishing and Documentation, Wageningen, Holland. p. 164, 168, 170.

GEBER, U. 1987. Occurrence of soil home pathogens on beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in Nicaragua. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Research Information Center. Uppsala, Sweden. 16 p.

GIBSON, I.A.S. 1961. An anomalous effect of PCNB on the incidence of damping-off caused by a Phytium sp. Phytopathology 51:531-533.

KATAN, J.; LOCKWOOD, J.L 1970. Effect of Pentachloronitrobenzene on colonization of alfalfa residues by fungi and Streptomyces in soil Phytopathology 60:1578-1582.

KO, W.H.; ODA, M.K. 1972. The nature of control of Rhizoctonia solani by Pentachloronitrobenzene in soil. Phytopathology 62:385-387.

LEACH. LD.; GARBER, R.H. 1970. Control of Rhizoctonia solani in Rhizoctonia solani. Biology and Pathology. LR. Parmeter, Jr. ed. University of California Press, Berkeley. 255 P.

LIFSHTZ, R.; LIFSHTZ, S.; BAKER, R. 1985. Decrease in incidence of Rhizoctonia preemergence damping-off by use of integrated chemical and biological controls. Plant Disease 69:431434.

LLANO, G.A. 1997. Effects of fungicides an soil borne diseases on common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L) in Nicaragua. Swedish 1. Agric. Res. 17-69-75.

______; CAMPOS DE, C. 1983. Enfermedades del frijol común. In Manual de Producción de frijol común. Tapia, H. & García, J.E. Edits. MIDINRA, Managua, Nicaragua. 200 p.

MARTIN, H. 1968. Pesticide Manual. Basic information on the chemicals used as active components of pesticides. British Crop Protection Council (BCPC), England.

McCARTER, S.M.; BARKSDALE. T.H. 1977. Effectiveness of selected chemicals in controlling Rhizoctonia fruit rot of tomato in greenhouse avid field tem. Plant Dis. Reptr. 61:811-815.

MOORE. W.D.; CONOVER, R-A. 1955. Chemicals soils treatments for the control of Rhizoctonia on snap bean. Plant Dis. Reptr. 39:103-105.

OGOSHI, A. 1997. Ecology and patogenicity of anastomogis and intraespecific groups of Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn. Arm. Rev. Phytopathology 25:125-143.

PARMETER, J.R. Jr.; SHERWOOD, R.T.; PLAIT W.D. 1969. Anastomosis grouping among isolates of Thanatephorus cucumeris. Phytopathology 59:1270-1278.

PASTOR - CORRALES, M. 1985. Enfermedades del frijol causadas por hongos. In Frijol investigación y producción. López, M. edit. CIAT, Cali, Colombia. 169-206 p.

RODRIGUEZ - KABANA, R.; CURL, E.A. 1980. Nontarget effects of pesucides on soilbome pathogens and disease. Am. Rev. Phytopathol. 18:311-332.

SCHWART7,H.F.;GALVEZ, G. 1980. Bean production problems. Disease, insect, soil, aid climatic constraints of Phaseolus vulgaris, CIAT, Cali, Colombia.

SHLEVIN, E.; KATAN, J. Rhizoctonia disease of carrot seedling and its control. Plant Dis. Reptr. 59:29-32.

STOCKWEI.1, V.; HANDLEY, P. 1987. Lignification of lesion border in Rhizoctonia - infected bean hypocotyls. Phytopathology 77: 589593.

TAPIA, H.; GARCIA. J.E. 1983. Manual de producción de frijol común. MIDINRA, Managua, Nicaragua. 200 p.

WEBER, G.F. 1939. Web blight a disease of beans caused by Corticium microsclerotia. Phytopathology 29:559-575.

WORTHING, C.R. 1979. The pesticide manual. A World Compendium British Crop Protection Council. England.

Published

2016-06-27

How to Cite

Pichardo Guido, S. (2016). Evaluación de pentacloronitrobenceno (PCNB) en el control de la pudrición radicular cusada por Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn en frijol común (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Agronomía Mesoamericana, 1, 55–61. https://doi.org/10.15517/am.v1i0.25329