Management of Post-Extraction Orthodontic Relapse Using Miniplate Anchorage: A Case Report
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15517/phs3dc86Keywords:
Distalization; Orthodontic re-treatment; Miniplates; Relapse;Temporary anchorage device.Abstract
Orthodontic relapse, particularly after extraction-based treatment and compromised anchorage control situation, remains a clinical as well as esthetic challenge. This case report presents the successful re-treatment of a 24-year-old female patient with a relapsed malocclusion, proclined incisors, molar crossbites, and lip protrusion, following prior fixed orthodontic therapy with extraction of four premolars. Miniplate-assisted maxillary arch distalization was employed to accomplish en-masse retraction, correct molar relationship, and improve facial profile. The use of temporaray skeletal anchorage device such as miniplates imparted steady, compliance-free mechanics, ensuing enhanced dental occlusion and soft tissue harmony. Here we highlight the effectiveness of miniplate-based mechanics in complex retreatment circumstances where traditional anchorage generally proves to be inefficient.
Downloads
References
Chow L., Goonewardene M.S., Cook R., Firth M.J. Adult orthodontic retreatment: A survey of patient profiles and original treatment failings. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2020; 158 (3): 371-82.
Santiago R.C., da Silva Campos M.J., Vitral R.W.F., Vieira R.A., Nojima L.I., Sant'Anna E.F. Characteristics of patients seeking orthodontic retreatment. J World Fed Orthod. 2022; 11 (1): 36-40.
Maniyar N., Prakash A., Kumar K. Optimizing correction of class II malocclusion with miniplate-assisted en-masse maxillary arch distalization: A Case Report. J Oral Res. 2025; 14 (1): 69-80.
Ranasinghe A. and Babu H. Incidence of patients seeking retreatment of malocclusion reporting to the institution over 1 year period. J Res Med Dent Sci. 2022; 10 (11): 148-52.
Berg R. Post retention analysis of treatment problems and failures in 264 consecutively treated cases. Eur J Orthod. 1979; 1 (1): 55-68.
Karslı N., Ocak I., Gülnar B., Tüzüner T., Littlewood S.J. Patient perceptions and attitudes regarding post-orthodontic treatment changes. Angle Orthod. 2023; 93 (4): 440-6.
Little R.M., Riedel R.A., Artun J. An evaluation of changes in mandibular anterior alignment from 10 to 20 years postretention. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1988; 93 (5): 423-8.
Proffit W.R., Fields H.W., Sarver D.M. Contemporary Orthodontics. 6th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2019.
Sugawara J., Kanzaki R., Takahashi I., Nagasaka H., Nanda R. Distal movement of mandibular molars in adult patients with skeletal anchorage system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006; 129 (6): 723-33.
Kim S., Herring S., Wang I., et al. A comparison of miniplates and teeth for orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008; 133 (2): 189.e1-9.
Tsui W.K., Chua H.D., Cheung L.K. Bone anchor systems for orthodontic application: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012; 41 (11): 1427-38.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 A. T. Prakash, Nikunj Maniyar, Amarnath P. Upasi.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
ODOVTOS - Int. J. Dent. Sc. endorses CC BY-NC-SA
This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms. CC BY-NC-SA includes the following elements:
BY: credit must be given to the creator.
NC: Only noncommercial uses of the work are permitted.
SA: Adaptations must be shared under the same terms.



