Chairside Light-Curing as a Feasible Alternative to Laboratory Polymerization for Indirect Composite Resins: A Performance-Based In Vitro Study

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15517/9pwfnk63

Keywords:

Indirect composite resin; Chairside light-curing; Laboratory light-curing; Polymerization efficiency; Post-curing heat treatment; Mechanical performance.

Abstract

Indirect composite resins are widely used for extensive restorations due to their favorable mechanical properties; however, their polymerization typically requires laboratory light-curing devices, which may increase treatment time and cost and are not always readily available in routine clinical settings. High-intensity chairside light-curing units have been proposed as a potential alternative for extraoral polymerization. To evaluate, using a performance-based comparative approach under standardized post-curing conditions, whether chairside light-curing units can achieve mechanical properties comparable to those obtained with laboratory light curing in indirect composite resins. Indirect composite resin blocks (Twiny) were fabricated using a standardized mold (6×6×4 mm) and randomly allocated into three groups (n=20): laboratory light curing (control), chairside light curing for 20 s, and chairside light curing for 40 s. All specimens underwent thermal post-curing at 115 °C for 15 min to standardize polymer network maturation. Surface microhardness and compressive strength were evaluated. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by the LSD post hoc test (p<0.05). Chairside light-curing groups demonstrated significantly higher surface microhardness values compared with the laboratory-curing group (p<0.05), with no significant difference between 20 s and 40 s exposures (p>0.05). Compressive strength values did not differ significantly among groups (p>0.05), indicating comparable bulk mechanical performance. Within the limitations of this in vitro study, chairside light curing achieved mechanical performance comparable to laboratory polymerization for indirect composite resins when combined with standardized thermal post-curing. These findings suggest that chairside light-curing may represent a clinically practical alternative for extraoral polymerization in settings where laboratory devices are unavailable, although long-term in vivo performance requires further investigation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Ammar Abdullah, Department of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, Indonesia.

    Ammar Abdullah is a postgraduate researcher at the Department of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, Indonesia. His research interests include restorative dental materials, indirect composite resins, and polymerization techniques.

  • Maria Tanumihardja, Department of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, Indonesia.

    Maria Tanumihardja is a faculty member at the Department of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, Indonesia. Her research interests include dental biomaterials, polymer-based restorative materials, and laboratory evaluation of restorative techniques.

References

Demarco F.F., Collares K., Correa M.B., Cenci M.S., de Moraes R.R., Opdamz N.J. Should my composite restorations last forever? Why are they failing? Braz Oral Res. 2017 Aug 1; 31 (suppl 1): 92-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2017.vol31.0056

Azeem R.A., Sureshbabu N.M. Clinical performance of direct versus indirect composite restorations in posterior teeth: A systematic review. J Conserv Dent. 2018 Jan 1; 21 (1): 2-9.

Heyder M., Kranz S., Wehle B., Schulze-Späte U., Beck J., Hennig C.L., et al. Suitability of Direct Resin Composites in Restoring Endodontically Treated Teeth (ETT). Materials (Basel). 2024 Aug 1; 17 (15): 3707-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17153707

Schwendicke F., Stolpe M. Restoring root-canal treated molars: Cost-effectiveness-analysis of direct versus indirect restorations. J Dent. 2018 Oct 1; 77: 37-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2018.07.007

Nandini S. Indirect resin composites. J Conserv Dent. 2010;13 (4): 184-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.73377

Carrillo-Cotto R., da Silva A.F., Isolan C.P., Selayaran R.P.G., Selayaran M., Lima F.G., et al. Effects of alternatively used thermal treatments on the mechanical and fracture behavior of dental resin composites with varying filler content. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2021 May 1; 117: 104-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104424

Souza R.O.A., Özcan M., Michida S.M.A., de Melo R.M., Pavanelli C.A., Bottino M.A., et al. Conversion degree of indirect resin composites and effect of thermocycling on their physical properties. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2010 Apr; 19 (3): 218-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00551.x

Dias M.F., Espíndola-Castro L.F., Lins-Filho P.C., Teixeira H.M., Silva C.H.V., Guimarães R.P. Influence of different thermopolymerization methods on composite resin microhardness. J Clin Exp Dent. 2020; 12 (4): e335-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.56772

Imai H., Koizumi H., Kodaira A., Okamura K., Akahane S., Matsumura H. Properties of indirect composites polymerized with laboratory light-emitting diode units. J Oral Sci. 2019; 61 (1): 178-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.18-0147

Aung S.Z., Takagaki T., Ikeda M., Nozaki K., Burrow M.F., Abdou A., et al. The effect of different light curing units on Vickers microhardness and degree of conversion of flowable resin composites. Dent Mater J. 2021; 40 (1): 44-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2019-353

Kowalska A., Sokolowski J., Bociong K. The Photoinitiators Used in Resin Based Dental Composite-A Review and Future Perspectives. Polymers (Basel). 2021 Feb 1; 13 (3): 1-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13030470

Barakah H. Effect of different curing times and distances on the microhardness of nanofilled resin-based composite restoration polymerized with high-intensity LED light curing units. Saudi Dent J. 2021 Dec 1; 33 (8): 1035-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2021.05.007

de Kuijper M.C.F.M., Cune M.S., Özcan M., Gresnigt M.M.M. Clinical performance of direct composite resin versus indirect restorations on endodontically treated posterior teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2023 Sep 1; 130 (3): 295-306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.11.009

Ilie N., Hilton T.J., Heintze S.D., Hickel R., Watts D.C., Silikas N., et al. Academy of Dental Materials guidance—Resin composites: Part I—Mechanical properties. Dental Materials. 2017 Aug 1; 33 (8): 880-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2017.04.013

Catelan A., Santo M.R.D.E., Menegazzo L.M., Moraes J.C.S., Santos P.H. Dos. Effect of light curing modes on mechanical properties of direct and indirect composites. Acta Odontol Scand. 2013 May; 71 (3-4): 697-702. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2012.715193

Duratbegović D., Pervan N., Jakupović S., Kobašlija S. The Effects of Intensity, Exposure Time, and Distance of Polymerization Light on Vickers Microhardness and Temperature Rise of Conventional Resin-Based Composite. Polymers (Basel). 2024 Nov 1;16 (22): 31-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16223175

Price R.B., Ferracane J.L., Hickel R., Sullivan B. The light-curing unit: An essential piece of dental equipment. Int Dent J. 2020 Dec 1; 70 (6): 407-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/idj.12582

Oh S., Kim H.J., Kim H.J., Antonson S.A., Kim S.Y. Influence of irradiation distance on the mechanical performances of resin composites polymerized with high-irradiance light curing units. Biomater Res. 2022 Dec 1; 26 (1): 18-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40824-022-00267-5

Francis N., Rajan R.R., Kumar V., Varughese A., Karuveetil V., Sapna C.M. Effect of irradiance from curing units on the microhardness of composite - a systematic review. Evid Based Dent. 2022 Oct 17; 24-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-022-0824-z

Aromaa M.K., Lassila L.V.J., Vallittu P.K. Effect of Distance on Light Transmission Through Polymerized Resin Composite. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2017 Sep 1; 25 (3): 131-5.

Rodriguez A., Yaman P., Dennison J., Garcia D. Effect of Light-Curing Exposure Time, Shade, and Thickness on the Depth of Cure of Bulk Fill Composites. Oper Dent. 2017 Sep 1; 42 (5): 505-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2341/16-057-L

Torres C.R.G., Prado T.P., Ávila D.M. da S., Pucci C.R., Borges A.B. Influence of Light-Curing Time and Increment Thickness on the Properties of Bulk Fill Composite Resins With Distinct Application Systems. Int J Dent. 2024; 2024 (1): 21-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/2123406

Hirata M., Koizumi H., Tanoue N., Ogino T., Murakami M., Matsumura H. Influence of laboratory light sources on the wear characteristics of indirect composites. Dent Mater J. 2011; 30 (2): 127-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2010-043

Luo Q., Kitchen M. Microhardness, Indentation Size Effect and Real Hardness of Plastically Deformed Austenitic Hadfield Steel. Materials (Basel). 2023 Feb 1; 16 (3): 11-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16031117

Published

2026-04-17