Effect of Desensitizing Mouth Rinses on Surface Properties of 3D-Printed Crowns: An In Vitro Study

Authors

  • Uravi Agarwal Department of Biochemistry, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, India. Author https://orcid.org/0009-0006-0848-7935
  • Gayathri R. Department of Biochemistry, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, India. Author https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3325-7593
  • Balaji Ganesh S. Department of Periodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, India. Author https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2786-8374
  • Vishnu Priya V. Department of Biochemistry, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, India. Author https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5071-9860
  • Jayalakshmi Somasundaram Department of Conservative Dentistry, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, India. Author https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3515-5558
  • Hemashree K. Department of Oral Pathology, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, India. Author https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9616-6539

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15517/0w4s8h82

Keywords:

3D-printed crowns; Heat-cured crowns; Cold-cured crowns; Desensitizing mouth rinse; Surface roughness; Hardness; Color stability.

Abstract

This study evaluates the effect of desensitizing mouth rinses on the surface properties of 3D-printed crowns compared to heat-cured and cold-cured crowns. Thirty dental crowns were fabricated and divided into three groups: 3D-printed crowns, heat-cured crowns, and cold-cured crowns (n=10 each). All samples underwent daily immersion in a desensitizing mouth rinse (Senquel AD) for four weeks. Surface roughness, hardness, and color stability were analyzed pre- and post-treatment using a profilometer, Vickers hardness tester, and spectrophotometer. Statistical analyses were performed using ANOVA and post-hoc tests. 3D-printed crowns showed a significant increase in surface roughness and a reduction in hardness after exposure to the mouth rinse, while heat-cured crowns exhibited minimal changes. Cold-cured crowns demonstrated moderate alterations in surface properties. Color stability was unaffected in all groups. Desensitizing mouth rinses exert differential effects on dental crowns. While 3D-printed crowns are more susceptible to changes, heat-cured crowns retain superior surface stability. This underscores the importance of material-specific considerations when prescribing mouth rinses to patients.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Luthardt R.G., Sandkuhl O., Herold V. 2008. CAD/CAM-generated high-density polymer restorations: a clinical and laboratory evaluation. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 29 (3): 152-64.

Strub J.R., Rekow E.D., Witkowski S. 2006. Computer-aided design and fabrication of dental restorations: current systems and future possibilities. J Prosthet Dent. 95 (6): 483-90.

Kim S.Y., Lee J.H., Kim Y.T., Lee M.H., Rhee S.H. 2013. Comparative evaluation of the mechanical properties of composite resins. J Adv Prosthodont. 5 (1): 86-92.

Drummond J.L. 2008. Degradation, fatigue, and failure of resin dental composite materials. J Dent. 36 (8): 620-5.

Bollen C.M., Lambrechts P., Quirynen M. 1997. Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: a review of the literature. J Clin Periodontol. 24 (7): 508-18.

Ferracane J.L. 2006. Hygroscopic and hydrolytic effects in dental polymer networks. Dent Mater. 22 (3): 211-22.

Addy M., Hunter M.L. 2004. Can tooth brushing damage your teeth? Am Clin Periodontol. 31 (10): 811-21.

Reddy P.S., Tejaswi C., Sujatha I. 2012. Effect of mouth rinses on color stability of resin composites subjected to accelerated aging. J Conserv Dent. 15 (1): 16-20. Yap A.U., Low J.S., Ong L.F. 2003. Effect of mouth rinses on microhardness and wear of composite and compomer restoratives. Oper Dent. 28 (6): 740-6.

da Silva E.M., Della Bona A., Del Bel Cury A.A., et al. 2014. Effect of toothbrushing-mouth rinse cycling on surface roughness and topography of nanofilled, microfilled, and microhybrid resin composites. Oper Dent. 39 (5): 521-9.

Soderholm K.J. 2001. Review of the effect of water on the mechanical properties of dental composites. Dent Mater. 17 (4): 340-7.

Tarrosh M.Y., Moaleem M.M.A., Mughals A.I., Houmady R., Zain A.A., Moafa A., et al. 2024. Evaluation of colour change, marginal adaptation, fracture strength, and failure type in maxillary and mandibular premolar zirconia endo-crowns. BMC Oral Health. 24 (1): 970.

Arthanari S., Venkatesh G.K., Sasikumar Y., Pugalmani S., Lee H., Hwang J.S., et al. 2024. Surface properties and corrosion performance of NaOH-treated Mg alloy in simulated body fluid solution. J Bio-Tribo-Corros. 10 (4). Available from: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40735-024-00910-9.

Saini R.S., Alshadidi A.A.F., Gurumurthy V., Okshah A., Vaddamanu S.K., Binduhayyim R.I.H., et al. 2024. Quantum mechanical analysis of yttrium-stabilized zirconia and alumina: implications for mechanical performance of esthetic crowns. Eur J Med Res. 29 (1): 254.

Sarrett D.C. 2005. Clinical challenges and the relevance of materials testing for posterior composite restorations. Dent Mater. 21 (1): 5-19.

Craig R.G., Powers J.M., Wataha J.C. 2001. Restorative Dental Materials. Mosby. Rueggeberg FA, Caughman WF, Curtis JW. 1997. Effect of light intensity and exposure duration on cure of resin composite. Dent Mater. 13 (4): 265-74.

Wiegand A., Attin T. 2007. Influence of fluoridated products on the mechanical properties of dental restorative materials. Dent Mater. 23 (7): 855-62.

Özcan M., Vallittu P.K. 2007. Effect of surface conditioning methods on the bond strength of luting cement to ceramics. J Adhes Dent. 9 (5): 399-404.

Heintze S.D., Forjanic M., Roulet J.F. 2017. Surface roughness and gloss of dental materials as a function of force and polishing time. Dent Mater. 33 (7): 765-95.

Shenoy A., Maiti S., Nallaswamy D., Keskar V. 2023. A comparison of the marginal fit of provisional crowns using the virtual tooth preparation workflow against the traditional technique. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 23 (4): 391-7.

Shenoy A., Nallaswamy D., Maiti S. 2023. Evaluation of the marginal fit of CAD/CAM crowns using CBCT and digital scanners. Ann Dent Spec. 11 (3): 1-8.

Lath T., Rathi N., Mehta V., Mopagar V.P., Patil R.U., Hugar S., et al. 2024. Evaluation of stress generation in core build-up material of mutilated primary teeth: a comparative finite element analysis between BioFlx, stainless steel, and zirconia crowns. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 48 (6): 117-22.

Yap A.U., Low J.S., Ong L.F. 2003. Effect of mouth rinses on microhardness and wear of composite and compomer restoratives. Oper Dent. 28 (6): 740-6.

Published

2025-11-06