Effect of Desensitizing Mouth Rinses on Surface Properties of 3D-Printed Crowns: An In Vitro Study

Agarwal, Uravi; R., Gayathri; S., Balaji Ganesh; V., Vishnu Priya; Somasundaram, Jayalakshmi; K., Hemashree

doi:10.15517/0w4s8h82

Autores/as

Uravi Agarwal Department of Biochemistry, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, India. Autor/a https://orcid.org/0009-0006-0848-7935
Gayathri R. Department of Biochemistry, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, India. Autor/a https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3325-7593
Balaji Ganesh S. Department of Periodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, India. Autor/a https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2786-8374
Vishnu Priya V. Department of Biochemistry, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, India. Autor/a https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5071-9860
Jayalakshmi Somasundaram Department of Conservative Dentistry, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, India. Autor/a https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3515-5558
Hemashree K. Department of Oral Pathology, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, India. Autor/a https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9616-6539

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15517/0w4s8h82

Palabras clave:

Coronas impresas en 3D; Coronas polimerizadas por calor; Coronas polimerizadas por frío; Enjuague bucal desensibilizante; Rugosidad superficial; Dureza; Estabilidad del color.

Resumen

Este estudio evalúa el efecto de los enjuagues bucales desensibilizantes sobre las propiedades superficiales de coronas dentales impresas en 3D en comparación con coronas polimerizadas por calor y por frío. Se fabricaron treinta coronas dentales, las cuales se dividieron en tres grupos: coronas impresas en 3D, coronas polimerizadas por calor y coronas polimerizadas por frío (n=10 en cada grupo). Todas las muestras fueron sometidas a inmersión diaria en un enjuague bucal desensibilizante (Senquel AD) durante cuatro semanas. Se analizaron la rugosidad superficial, la dureza y la estabilidad del color antes y después del tratamiento utilizando un perfilómetro, un durómetro Vickers y un espectrofotómetro. Los análisis estadísticos se realizaron mediante ANOVA y pruebas post hoc. Las coronas impresas en 3D mostraron un aumento significativo en la rugosidad superficial y una disminución en la dureza tras la exposición al enjuague bucal, mientras que las coronas polimerizadas por calor presentaron cambios mínimos. Las coronas polimerizadas por frío exhibieron alteraciones moderadas en sus propiedades superficiales. La estabilidad del color no se vio afectada en ninguno de los grupos. Los enjuagues bucales desensibilizantes ejercen efectos diferenciales sobre las coronas dentales. Las coronas impresas en 3D son más susceptibles a modificaciones en sus propiedades superficiales, mientras que las coronas polimerizadas por calor mantienen una estabilidad superior. Estos hallazgos resaltan la importancia de considerar las características específicas del material al prescribir enjuagues bucales a los pacientes.

Descargas

Los datos de descarga aún no están disponibles.

Referencias

Luthardt R.G., Sandkuhl O., Herold V. 2008. CAD/CAM-generated high-density polymer restorations: a clinical and laboratory evaluation. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 29 (3): 152-64.

Strub J.R., Rekow E.D., Witkowski S. 2006. Computer-aided design and fabrication of dental restorations: current systems and future possibilities. J Prosthet Dent. 95 (6): 483-90.

Kim S.Y., Lee J.H., Kim Y.T., Lee M.H., Rhee S.H. 2013. Comparative evaluation of the mechanical properties of composite resins. J Adv Prosthodont. 5 (1): 86-92.

Drummond J.L. 2008. Degradation, fatigue, and failure of resin dental composite materials. J Dent. 36 (8): 620-5.

Bollen C.M., Lambrechts P., Quirynen M. 1997. Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: a review of the literature. J Clin Periodontol. 24 (7): 508-18.

Ferracane J.L. 2006. Hygroscopic and hydrolytic effects in dental polymer networks. Dent Mater. 22 (3): 211-22.

Addy M., Hunter M.L. 2004. Can tooth brushing damage your teeth? Am Clin Periodontol. 31 (10): 811-21.

Reddy P.S., Tejaswi C., Sujatha I. 2012. Effect of mouth rinses on color stability of resin composites subjected to accelerated aging. J Conserv Dent. 15 (1): 16-20. Yap A.U., Low J.S., Ong L.F. 2003. Effect of mouth rinses on microhardness and wear of composite and compomer restoratives. Oper Dent. 28 (6): 740-6.

da Silva E.M., Della Bona A., Del Bel Cury A.A., et al. 2014. Effect of toothbrushing-mouth rinse cycling on surface roughness and topography of nanofilled, microfilled, and microhybrid resin composites. Oper Dent. 39 (5): 521-9.

Soderholm K.J. 2001. Review of the effect of water on the mechanical properties of dental composites. Dent Mater. 17 (4): 340-7.

Tarrosh M.Y., Moaleem M.M.A., Mughals A.I., Houmady R., Zain A.A., Moafa A., et al. 2024. Evaluation of colour change, marginal adaptation, fracture strength, and failure type in maxillary and mandibular premolar zirconia endo-crowns. BMC Oral Health. 24 (1): 970.

Arthanari S., Venkatesh G.K., Sasikumar Y., Pugalmani S., Lee H., Hwang J.S., et al. 2024. Surface properties and corrosion performance of NaOH-treated Mg alloy in simulated body fluid solution. J Bio-Tribo-Corros. 10 (4). Available from: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40735-024-00910-9.

Saini R.S., Alshadidi A.A.F., Gurumurthy V., Okshah A., Vaddamanu S.K., Binduhayyim R.I.H., et al. 2024. Quantum mechanical analysis of yttrium-stabilized zirconia and alumina: implications for mechanical performance of esthetic crowns. Eur J Med Res. 29 (1): 254.

Sarrett D.C. 2005. Clinical challenges and the relevance of materials testing for posterior composite restorations. Dent Mater. 21 (1): 5-19.

Craig R.G., Powers J.M., Wataha J.C. 2001. Restorative Dental Materials. Mosby. Rueggeberg FA, Caughman WF, Curtis JW. 1997. Effect of light intensity and exposure duration on cure of resin composite. Dent Mater. 13 (4): 265-74.

Wiegand A., Attin T. 2007. Influence of fluoridated products on the mechanical properties of dental restorative materials. Dent Mater. 23 (7): 855-62.

Özcan M., Vallittu P.K. 2007. Effect of surface conditioning methods on the bond strength of luting cement to ceramics. J Adhes Dent. 9 (5): 399-404.

Heintze S.D., Forjanic M., Roulet J.F. 2017. Surface roughness and gloss of dental materials as a function of force and polishing time. Dent Mater. 33 (7): 765-95.

Shenoy A., Maiti S., Nallaswamy D., Keskar V. 2023. A comparison of the marginal fit of provisional crowns using the virtual tooth preparation workflow against the traditional technique. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 23 (4): 391-7.

Shenoy A., Nallaswamy D., Maiti S. 2023. Evaluation of the marginal fit of CAD/CAM crowns using CBCT and digital scanners. Ann Dent Spec. 11 (3): 1-8.

Lath T., Rathi N., Mehta V., Mopagar V.P., Patil R.U., Hugar S., et al. 2024. Evaluation of stress generation in core build-up material of mutilated primary teeth: a comparative finite element analysis between BioFlx, stainless steel, and zirconia crowns. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 48 (6): 117-22.

Yap A.U., Low J.S., Ong L.F. 2003. Effect of mouth rinses on microhardness and wear of composite and compomer restoratives. Oper Dent. 28 (6): 740-6.