Reconsiderando la respuesta celular a los movimientos ortodónticos. Desde las perspetivas mecánicas a las bioquímicas

Autores/as

  • Iñigo Gaitán-Salvatella Tissue Bioengineering Laboratory, DEPeI, School of Dentistry, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de México (UNAM), Circuito Exterior s/n C.P.04510, CDMX, México. Autor/a https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9601-0673
  • Airy Teramoto-Lida Tissue Bioengineering Laboratory, DEPeI, School of Dentistry, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de México (UNAM), Circuito Exterior s/n C.P.04510, CDMX, México. Autor/a https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5483-4789
  • Marco Antonio Alvarez-Pérez Tissue Bioengineering Laboratory, DEPeI, School of Dentistry, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de México (UNAM), Circuito Exterior s/n C.P.04510, CDMX, México. Autor/a https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1895-262X
  • Francisco Javier Marichi-Rodríguez Tissue Bioengineering Laboratory, DEPeI, School of Dentistry, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de México (UNAM), Circuito Exterior s/n C.P.04510, CDMX, México. Autor/a https://orcid.org/0009-0007-2541-4399

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15517/xbaew314

Palabras clave:

Movimiento dental ortodóncico; Fuerzas mecánicas; Señal piezoeléctrica; Respuesta tisular y celular.

Resumen

Los movimientos dentales ortodónticos son un proceso complejo que involucra fuerzas mecánicas aplicadas a los órganos dentarios, lo que lleva a cambios en el ligamento periodontal, el hueso alveolar, la pulpa dental y el tejido neovascular. La influencia mecanosensible de las señales eléctricas a través de los canales iónicos desempeña un papel importante en la comprensión de las vías de señalización celular y la diferenciación celular para aumentar y promover la remodelación y regeneración del tejido óseo. El mecanismo de señalización celular en respuesta al potencial bioeléctrico debido a la carga mecánica, incluida la mecanodetección, la transducción y las respuestas celulares, facilita el movimiento dental en respuesta a las fuerzas mecánicas. Asimismo, la unidad neurovascular desempeña un papel crucial durante el movimiento dental ortodóncico, involucrando una actividad coordinada de los osteoclastos y osteoblastos para remodelar el hueso alveolar. Esta revisión tiene como objetivo presentar los procesos biológicos que sustentan la respuesta celular en el movimiento dental ortodóncico para profundizar nuestra comprensión sobre este mecanismo, centrándose explícitamente en el papel de la traducción de señales durante la respuesta biológica de los tejidos circunvecinos al órgano dentario.

Descargas

Los datos de descarga aún no están disponibles.

Referencias

Sharma R., Naveena P. Amit S. Neurological mechanisms involved in orthodontic tooth movement: A contemporary review. Int J Contemp Dent Med Rev 2015: 250115.

Kayabekir M., Tuncer M. Effect of teeth clenching on handgrip force in adult men: role of periodontal mechanoreceptors. Acta Neurol. Belg 2023; 123 (5): 1945-1956.

Schwarz A.M. Tissue changes incidental to orthodontic tooth movement. International Journal of Orthodontia, Oral Surgery and Radiography 1932; 18: 331-352.

Noda K., Nakamura Y., Kogure K., Nomura Y. Morphological changes in the rat periodontal ligament and its vascularity after experimental tooth movement using superelastic forces. Eur. J. Orthod. 2009; 31: 37-45.

Jones M.L. An investigation into the initial discomfort caused by placement of an archwire. Eur. J. Orthod. 1984; 6: 48-54.

Sergl H.G., Klages U., Zentner A. Pain and discomfort during orthodontic treatment: causative factors and effects on compliance. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop. 1998; 114: 684-691.

Ren Y., Hazemeijer H., de Haan B., Qu N., de Vos P. Cytokine profiles in crevicular fluid during orthodontic tooth movement of short and long durations. J. Periodontol. 2007; 78: 453-458.

Asiry M. A. Biological aspects of orthodontic tooth movement: A review of literature. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2018; 25: 1027-1032.

Alikhani M., Sangsuwon C., Alansari S., Nervina J.M., Teixeira C.C. Biphasic theory: breakthrough understanding of tooth movement. J. World Fed. Orthod. 2018; 7: 82-88.

Will L.A. Orthodontic Tooth Movement: A Historic Prospective. Front. Oral Biol. 2016; 18: 46-55.

Karanth H.S., Shetty K.S. Orthodontic tooth movement and bioelectricity. Indian J. Dent. Res. 2001; 12: 212-221.

Bassett C.A., Becker R.O. Generation of electric potentials by bone in response to mechanical stress. Science 1962; 137: 1063-1064.

Barsi P.C. et al. Can bioelectrical stimulation favor orthodontic treatment? A randomized clinical trial to evaluate tooth movement, patient-centered, and inflammatory biomarker outcomes. AJO-DO Clinical Companion 2023; 3: 464-472.

Bani-Hani M.A.K.M., Amin Karami M. Piezoelectric teeth aligners to accelerate orthodontics treatment. Adv. Sci., Technol. Eng. Syst. J. 2020; 3: 178-190.

Figueiredo D.S.F. et al. Effects of piezocision in orthodontic tooth movement: A systematic review of comparative studies. J Clin Exp Dent 2019; 11: e1078-e1092.

Kim D.H., Park Y.G., Kang S.G. The effects of electrical current from a micro-electrical device on tooth movement. Korean J. Orthod. 2008; 38: 337.

Mayama A., Seiryu M., Takano-Yamamoto T. Effect of vibration on orthodontic tooth movement in a double-blind prospective randomized controlled trial. Sci. Rep. 2022; 12: 1288.

Min Q., Gao Y., Wang Y. Bioelectricity in dental medicine: a narrative review. Biomed. Eng. Online 2024; 23: 3.

Yamaguchi M., Nakajima R., Kasai K. Mechanoreceptors, Nociceptors, and Orthodontic Tooth Movement. Semin. Orthod. 2012; 18: 249-256.

Chen Y. et al. Dental-derived mesenchymal stem cell sheets: a prospective tissue engineering for regenerative medicine. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2022; 13: 38.

Jeon H.H., Teixeira H., Tsai A. Mechanistic Insight into Orthodontic Tooth Movement Based on Animal Studies: A Critical Review. J. Clin. Med. Res. 2021; 10 (8): 1733.

Datta T., Przyklenk K., Datta N.S. Parathyroid Hormone-Related Peptide: A Novel Endocrine Cardioprotective ‘Conditioning Mimetic’. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. Ther. 2017; 22: 529-537.

Plotkin L.I., Bruzzaniti A. Chapter Six - Molecular signaling in bone cells: Regulation of cell differentiation and survival. in Advances in Protein Chemistry and Structural Biology (ed. Donev, R.) vol. 116 237-281 (Academic Press, 2019).

Reierson G.W., Guo S., Mastronardi C., Licinio, J., Wong M.L. cGMP Signaling, Phosphodiesterases and Major Depressive Disorder. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 2011; 9: 715-727.

Podda M.V., Grassi C. New perspectives in cyclic nucleotide-mediated functions in the CNS: the emerging role of cyclic nucleotide-gated (CNG) channels. Pflugers Arch. 2014; 466: 1241-1257.

Bosanac I., Michikawa T., Mikoshiba K., Ikura M. Structural insights into the regulatory mechanism of IP3 receptor. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2004; 1742: 89-102.

Al-Maswary A.A. et al. Exploring the neurogenic differentiation of human dental pulp stem cells. PLoS One 2022; 17: e0277134.

Zhu R. et al. Electrical stimulation affects neural stem cell fate and function in vitro. Exp. Neurol. 2019; 319: 112963.

Nelson A.R. Peripheral Pathways to Neurovascular Unit Dysfunction, Cognitive Impairment, and Alzheimer’s Disease. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2022; 14: 858429.

Huang W. et al. Microglia-Mediated Neurovascular Unit Dysfunction in Alzheimer’s Disease. J. Alzheimers. Dis. 2023; 94: S335-S354.

Sweeney M.D., Zhao Z., Montagne A., Nelson A.R., Zlokovic B. V. Blood-Brain Barrier: From Physiology to Disease and Back. Physiol. Rev. 2019; 99: 21-78.

Zhou R., Li J., Wang R., Chen Z., Zhou F. The neurovascular unit in healthy and injured spinal cord. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab.2023; 43: 1437-1455.

Yu X., Ji C., Shao A. Neurovascular Unit Dysfunction and Neurodegenerative Disorders. Front. Neurosci. 2020; 14: 334.

Ahmad A., Patel V., Xiao J., Khan M.M. The Role of Neurovascular System in Neurodegenerative Diseases. Mol. Neurobiol. 2020; 57: 4373-4393.

AlAli A.M., Al Anzi T.H. Inferior alveolar nerve damage secondary to orthodontic treatment: A systematic scoping review. Int. J. Risk Saf. Med. 2021; 32: 175-191.

Colonna M., Butovsky O. Microglia Function in the Central Nervous System During Health and Neurodegeneration. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2017; 35: 441-468.

Augusto-Oliveira M. et al. What Do Microglia Really Do in Healthy Adult Brain? Cells 2019; 8 (10): 1293.

Dong T., Li M., Gao F., Wei P., Wang J. Construction and imaging of a neurovascular unit model. Neural Regeneration Res. 2022; 17: 1685-1694.

Simard M., Arcuino G., Takano T., Liu Q.S., Nedergaard M. Signaling at the gliovascular interface. J. Neurosci. 2003; 23: 9254-9262.

Bradl M., Lassmann H. Oligodendrocytes: biology and pathology. Acta Neuropathol. 2010; 119: 37-53.

Marton R.M. et al. Differentiation and maturation of oligodendrocytes in human three-dimensional neural cultures. Nat. Neurosci. 2019; 22: 484-491.

Brown L.S. et al. Pericytes and Neurovascular Function in the Healthy and Diseased Brain. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2019; 13: 282.

Attwell D., Mishra A., Hall C.N., O’Farrell F.M., Dalkara T. What is a pericyte? J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2016; 36: 451-455.

Bennett C. et al. Neuroinflammation, oxidative stress, and blood-brain barrier (BBB) disruption in acute Utah electrode array implants and the effect of deferoxamine as an iron chelator on acute foreign body response. Biomaterials 2019; 188: 144-159.

Sonne J., Lopez-Ojeda W. Neuroanatomy, Cranial Nerve. in StatPearls (StatPearls Publishing, Treasure Island (FL), 2022).

Gu L., Huang R., Ni N., Gu P., Fan X. Advances and Prospects in Materials for Craniofacial Bone Reconstruction. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 2023; 9: 4462-4496.

Datta P., Ozbolat V., Ayan B., Dhawan A., Ozbolat I. T. Bone tissue bioprinting for craniofacial reconstruction. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2017; 114: 2424-2431.

Fillmore E.P., Seifert M. F. Chapter 22 - Anatomy of the Trigeminal Nerve. in Nerves and Nerve Injuries (eds. Tubbs, R. S. et al.) 319-350 (Academic Press, San Diego, 2015).

Long H. et al. Current advances in orthodontic pain. Int. J. Oral Sci. 2016; 8: 67-75.

Delmas P., Hao J., Rodat-Despoix L. Molecular mechanisms of mechanotransduction in mammalian sensory neurons. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2011; 12: 139-153.

Linden R.W., Scott B.J. Distribution of mesencephalic nucleus and trigeminal ganglion mechanoreceptors in the periodontal ligament of the cat. J. Physiol. 1989; 410: 35-44.

Wang S. et al. Corrigendum: TRPV1 and TRPV1-Expressing Nociceptors Mediate Orofacial Pain Behaviors in a Mouse Model of Orthodontic Tooth Movement. Front. Physiol. 2019; 10: 1353.

Thammanichanon P., Kaewpitak A., Binlateh T., Pavasant P., Leethanakul C. Varied temporal expression patterns of trigeminal TRPA1 and TRPV1 and the neuropeptide CGRP during orthodontic force-induced pain. Arch. Oral Biol. 2021; 128: 105170.

Lukacs L., Rennekampff I., Tenenhaus M., Rennekampff H.O. The periodontal ligament, temperature-sensitive ion channels TRPV1-4, and the mechanosensitive ion channels Piezo1 and 2: A Nobel connection. J. Periodontal Res. 2023; 58: 687-696.

Yang Z. et al. Behavioral responses and expression of P2X3 receptor in trigeminal ganglion after experimental tooth movement in rats. Arch. Oral Biol. 2009; 54: 63-70.

Purves D. et al. Hyperalgesia and Sensitization. in Neuroscience. 2nd edition (Sinauer Associates, 2001).

Proff P. et al. Local Vascularization during Orthodontic Tooth Movement in a Split Mouth Rat Model-A MRI Study. Biomedicines 2020; 8: 632.

Publicado

2026-04-22