Relationship between models of technology acceptance, artificial intelligence, and information behavior: a systematic literature review

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15517/3npxt231

Keywords:

artificial intelligence, technology acceptance model, information behavior, systematic literature review

Abstract

Objective: To conduct a systematic literature review (SLR) on technology acceptance models (TAM) regarding the adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) and its relationship with information behavior (IB) in educational settings, consolidating definitions, methods, and research gaps. Methodology: The SRL was divided into two stages: the first was the planning stage, which involved defining the need for the review between 2013 and 2024, selecting keywords in Spanish and English, Boolean operators, the subject area, and the databases DOAJ, Elsevier, and Google Scholar; and the second was the implementation stage, where inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, and the information was organized into a detailed matrix including author, country, model, definitions, hypotheses, and instruments. Results: Theoretical and empirical findings on models of technology acceptance related to AI, CI, and the complementary methodological relationship among the various models identified. Conclusions: There has been an increase in publications measuring the perceived usefulness and ease of use of AI systems in the classroom; however, there is a need to develop specific measurement instruments for AI, enrich the constructs, and address ethical and cultural dimensions. Finally, the importance of replicable protocols is emphasized to ensure comparability and rigor in future research.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Víctor Alonso Osorio Echavarría, Universidad de Antioquia, COLOMBIA

    Investigador, estudiante de último semestre de Bibliotecología

    Escuela Interamericana de Bibliotecología 

    Universidad de Antioquia

     

References

Abdullah, F., & Ward, R. (2016). Developing a general extended technology acceptance model for e-learning (GETAMEL) by analysing commonly used external factors. Computers in Human Behavior, 56, 238-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.036

Arenas, S., Giraldo, M., Ochoa, J., & Tangarife, A. (2022). Posibilidad, riesgo e incertidumbre: análisis de tendencias en las ciencias de la información. Revista Interamericana de Bibliotecología, 45(3), e347313. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rib.v45n3e347313

Ávila Barrientos, E. (2022). Recuperación de información en los sistemas de próxima generación. https://ru.iibi.unam.mx/jspui/bitstream/IIBI_UNAM/626/1/05_practicas_sociales_eder_avila.pdf

Bates, M. J. (2010) Information behavior. In Encyclopedia of Library and Information Sciences (3rd Ed. CRC Press, vol. 3, pp. 2381-2391).

https://pages.gseis.ucla.edu/faculty/bates/articles/information-behavior.html

Castillo-Vergara, M., Álvarez-Marín, A., Villavicencio Pinto, E., & Valdez-Juárez, L. E. (2022). Technological Acceptance of Industry 4.0 by Students from Rural Areas. Electronics, 11(14), 2109. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11142109

Cubillos, J. (1995). Una investigación empírica sobre necesidades y comportamiento informativo de usuarios del desarrollo. Informatio. Revista del Instituto de Información de la Facultad de Información y Comunicación, 1(1), 67-83. https://informatio.fic.edu.uy/index.php/informatio/article/view/9

Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science, 35, 982-1003.

Duong, C. D., Vu, T. N., & Ngo, T. V. N. (2023). Applying a modified technology acceptance model to explain higher education students’ usage of ChatGPT: A serial multiple mediation model with knowledge sharing as a moderator. The International Journal of Management Education, 21(3), 100883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100883

Estriegana, R., Medina-Merodio, J. A., & Barchino, R. (2019). Student acceptance of virtual laboratory and practical work: An extension of the technology acceptance model. Computers y Education, 135, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.02.010

Fernández Marcial, V., & Esteves Gomes, L. I. (2022). Impacto de la Inteligencia Artificial en el comportamiento informacional: elementos para el debate. Bibliotecas. Anales de Investigación, 18(3), 1-12.

González-Bravo, L., & Valdivia-Peralta, M. (2015). Posibilidades para el uso del modelo de aceptación de la tecnología (TAM) y de la teoría de los marcos tecnológicos para evaluar la aceptación de nuevas tecnologías para el aseguramiento de la calidad en la educación superior chilena. Revista Electrónica Educare, 19(2), 181-196.http://www.scielo.sa.cr/scielo.php?script=sci_arttextypid=S1409-42582015000200011

González Guitián, M. V., de Zayas Pérez, M. R., Núñez Grillo, M. M., Rodríguez Arias, K., & González Sánchez, A. L. (2022). Comportamiento informacional en Internet en estudiantes de Ciencias de la Información, Universidad de Holguín. Información, Cultura y Sociedad, (46), 107-127. https://doi.org/10.34096/ics.i46.11250

Kelly, S., Kaye, S. A., & Oviedo-Trespalacios, O. (2023). What factors contribute to the acceptance of artificial intelligence? A systematic review. Telematics and Informatics, 77, 101925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2022.101925

Kwasitsu, L., & Chiu, A. M. (2019). Mobile information behavior of Warner Pacific University students. Library and Information Science Research, 41(2), 139-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2019.04.002

Lai, C. Y., Cheung, K. Y., & Chan, C. S. (2023). Exploring the role of intrinsic motivation in ChatGPT adoption to support active learning: An extension of the technology acceptance model. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100178

Ma, J., Wang, P., Li, B., Wang, T., Pang, X. S., & Wang, D. (2024). Explorando la adopción de ChatGPT por parte de los usuarios: una perspectiva del modelo de aceptación de tecnología. Revista Internacional de Interacción Persona-Computadora, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2314358

Marcial, V. F. (2018). Comportamiento informacional: Nuevos escenarios, nuevos desafíos. Páginas ayb: arquivos e bibliotecas, 3-16.

Marcial, V. F., & Esteves Gomes, L. I. (2022). Impacto de la Inteligencia Artificial en el comportamiento informacional: elementos para el debate. Bibliotecas. Anales de Investigación, 18(3), 1-12.

Murciano Hueso, A., Martín García, A. V., & Torrijos Fincias, P. (2022). Revisión sistemática de aceptación de la tecnología digital en personas mayores. Perspectiva de los modelos TAM. Revista Española de Geriatría y Gerontología, 105-117. https://pesquisa.bvsalud.org/portal/resource/pt/ibc-205500

Nja, C. O., Idiege, K. J., Uwe, U. E., Meremikwu, A. N., Ekon, E. E., Erim, C. M., & Cornelius-Ukpepi, B. U. (2023). Adoption of artificial intelligence in science teaching: From the vantage point of the African science teachers. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 42. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00261-x

Ocaña-Fernandez, Y., Valenzuela-Fernandez, L., & Garro-Aburto, L. (2019). Inteligencia artificial y sus implicaciones en la educación superior. Propósitos y Representaciones, 7(2), 536-568. https://doi.org/10.20511/pyr2019.v7n2.274

Paul, J., & Rialp Criado, A. (2020). The art of writing literature review: What do we know and what do we need to know? International business review, 29(4), 101717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2020.101717

Roig-Vila, R., Rojas-Viteri, J., & Lascano-Herrera, N. A. (2022). Análisis del uso de Moodle desde la perspectiva del modelo TAM en tiempos de pandemia. RiiTE Revista Interuniversitaria de Investigación en Tecnología Educativa, (12), 95-112. https://doi.org/10.6018/riite.519341

Saif, N., Khan, S. U., Shaheen, I., ALotaibi, F. A., Alnfiai, M. M., & Arif, M. (2024). Chat-GPT; validating Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) in education sector via ubiquitous learning mechanism. Computers in Human Behavior, 154, 108097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.108097

Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2019). The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technology in education. Computers y Education, 128, 13-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009

Song, Y. W. (2019). User acceptance of an artificial intelligence (AI) virtual assistant: an extension of the technology acceptance model [Tesis]. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=trueydb=dduyAN=194F628A9A233EB6

Torres-Gómez, A. (2024). Necesidades de información y percepción sobre las herramientas de inteligencia artificial en estudiantes de doctorado en investigación educativa en Tlaxcala, México. Investigación Bibliotecológica: Archivonomía, bibliotecología e información, 38(98), 79-98. https://doi.org/10.22201/iibi.24488321xe.2024.98.58852

Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review. British Journal of Management, 14, 207-222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27, 425-478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540

Zou, M., & Huang, L. (2023). To use or not to use? Understanding doctoral students’ acceptance of ChatGPT in writing through technology acceptance model. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1259531. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1259531

Downloads

Published

2026-06-26