Challenges and Opportunities for the Adoption of Smart Greenhouses: Analysis in Costa Rica Agriculture
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15517/1hzghw74Keywords:
Agricultural technology, climate resilience, smart agricultural, sustainable strategies, technological adaptationAbstract
The successful incorporation of advanced technologies is a key challenge in modern agriculture to address climate change and the growing global demand for food. This study evaluated the potential implementation of climate-smart greenhouses (CSGs) in Costa Rica through four case studies focused on agroclimatic, technological, infrastructural, and market aspects. The methodology included a literature review and farm visits to interview agricultural producers and professionals specializing in greenhouse horticultural production. The findings demonstrated that CSGs can increase productivity by up to 30%, reduce water use by 40 %, and enhance agricultural resilience. However, this success depends on the effective integration of agroclimatic, technological, financial, and market factors. It is essential to develop collaborative strategies among public, private, and academic entities to implement pilot projects in tropical conditions for the validation and adoption of CSGs technologies while training professionals and producers. In conclusion, the successful implementation of CSGs requires precise technological and agronomic validation, a comprehensive approach to key factors, public policy support, and technical training for the agricultural sector.
Downloads
References
[1] R. Ruben y F. Saenz-Segura, “Farmers, Markets and Contracts: Chain Integration of Smallholder Producers in Costa Rica”, European Review of Latin American and Caribbean Studies, no. 85, pp. 61-80, oct. 2008, doi:10.18352/ERLACS. 9619.
[2] H. A. AL-agele, L. Nackley y C. W. Higgins, “A Pathway for Sustainable Agriculture”, Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 8, Art. no. 4328, abr. 2021, doi: 10.3390/su13084328.
[3] FAO, ONU, Roma, Italia. Climate-smart agriculture sourcebook. (2013). [En línea]. Disponible en: https://openknowledge.
fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/b21f2087-f398-4718-8461-b92afc82e617/content
[4] C. Bersani, A. Ouammi, R. Sacile, A. Soussi y E. Zero, “Model predictive control of Smart Greenhouses as the path towards near zero energy consumption”, Energies, vol. 13, no. 14, Art. no. 3647, jul. 2020, doi: 10.3390/en13143647.
[5] G. van Straten, G. van Willigenburg, E. van Henten y R. van Ooteghem, Optimal Control of Greenhouse Cultivation. Boca Ratón, FL, Estados Unidos: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, 2011, doi: 10.1201/b10321.
[6] C. Bersani, C. Ruggiero, R. Sacile, A. Soussi y E. Zero, “Internet of Things Approaches for Monitoring and Control of Smart Greenhouses in Industry 4.0”, Energies, vol. 15, no. 10, Art. no. 3834, may. 2022, doi: 10.3390/en15103834/ en15103834.
[7] N. Chamhuri, A. Hamid y M. H. Ismail, “Automated irrigation and fertilization for efficient greenhouse management”, Journal of Agricultural Engineering, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 55- 68, 2016.
[8] Y. Li, L. Wang y H. Zhang, “Energy-efficient management in automated greenhouse systems: Insights from control optimization”, Energy Build, vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 123-130, 2019.
[9] I. A. García Torres, R. E. Castillo León, W. R. Navas Espín y J. G. Veintimilla Andrade, “El Uso de la Inteligencia Artificial en un Invernadero”, Ciencia Latina. Revista Científica Multidisciplinar, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 910-930, ago. 2024, doi: 10.37811/cl_rcm.v8i4.12331.
[10] M. Rosas Leutenegger y P. Villasana López, “Adopción de tecnologías en sistemas de producción agroalimentario: una revisión de literatura”, RIVAR, vol. 9, no. 26, may. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.35588/rivar.v9i26.5579.
[11] S. E. Luna Arauz, A. A. Andrade Vallejo, P. Guevara López y J. E. Rubiñoz Panta, “Supervisión de temperatura y humedad para el cálculo de balance energético en un invernadero con tiempos de muestreo obtenidos de forma experimental”, Pistas Educativas, vol. 39, no. 18, pp. 1014-1027, feb. 2018. [En línea]. Disponible en: https://pistaseducativas.celaya. tecnm.mx/index.php/pistas/article/view/1178
[12] A. Kavga, V. Thomopoulos, P. Barouchas, N. Stefanakis y A. Liopa-Tsakalidi, “Research on innovative training on smart greenhouse technologies for economic and environmental sustainability”, Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 19, oct. 2021, doi: 10.3390/su131910536.
[13] J. Lee, “Farmer participation in a climate-smart future: Evidence from the Kenya agricultural carbon market project”, Land Use Policy, vol. 68, pp. 72–79, nov. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.07.020.
[14] A. Khatri-Chhetri, P. K. Aggarwal, P. K. Joshi y S. Vyas, “Farmers’ prioritization of climate-smart agriculture (CSA) technologies”, Agric. Syst., vol. 151, pp. 184-191, feb. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2016.10.005.
[15] G. Cevikbilen, “Slope Stability of Soils”, en Handbook of Research on Trends and Digital Advances in Engineering Geology, N. Ceryan, Ed. Hershey, PA, Estados Unidos: IGI Global Scientific Publishing, 2018, pp. 380-415, doi: 10.4018/978-1-5225-2709-1.ch011.
[16] FAO, ONU, Roma, Italia. Leveraging COVID-19 recovery strategies to build climate-smart agrifood systems in developing countries. (2022). [En línea]. Disponible en: https:// openknowledge.fao.org/items/8b0a381a-3478-4178-9cad- 304b04b2e22a
[17] D. B. Lobell, G. L. Hammer, G. McLean, C. Messina, M. J. Roberts y W. Schlenker, “The impact of climate variability on global crop yields”, Nat. Clim. Chang., vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 600-606, 2018.
[18] E. J. van Henten et al., “An autonomous robot for harvesting cucumbers in greenhouses”, Auton. Robots, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 241-258, 2002, doi: 10.1023/A:1020568125418.
[19] G. Bagagiolo, G. Matranga, E. Cavallo y N. Pampuro, “Greenhouse Robots: Ultimate Solutions to Improve Automation in Protected Cropping Systems—A Review”, Sus tainability, vol. 14, no. 11, Art. no. 6436 may. 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14116436.
[20] D. Despommier, “Vertical farming systems for urban agriculture”, en Achieving sustainable urban architecture, J. S. C. Wiskerke, Ed. Cambridge, Reino Unido: Burleigh Dodds, 2020, pp. 143-172, doi: 10.19103/as.2019.0063.10.
[21] J. Pretty et al., “Global assessment of agricultural system redesign for sustainable intensification”, Nat. Sustain., vol.1, no. 8, pp. 441-446, ago. 2018, doi: 10.1038/s41893-018-0114-0.
[22] R. R. Shamshiri et al., “Advances in greenhouse automation and controlled environment agriculture: A transition to plant factories and urban agriculture”, International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1-22, 2018, doi: 10.25165/j.ijabe.20181101.3210.
[23] I. A. García Torres, R. E. Castillo León, W. R. Navas Espín y J. G. Veintimilla Andrade, “El Uso de la Inteligencia Artificial en un Invernadero,” Ciencia Latina. Revista Científica Multidisciplinar, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 910-930, ago. 2024, doi: 10.37811/cl_rcm.v8i4.12331.
[24] J. A. Valenciano et al., “Financing systems in rural agricultural chains: an unsuccessful case in producing cucumbers in Zarcero, Costa Rica”, Revista ABRA, vol. 33, no. 46, pp. 13-29, oct. 2013. [En línea]. Disponible en: https://www. revistas.una.ac.cr/index.php/abra/article/view/5111
[25] J. M. Vargas Canales, M. I. Palacios Rangel, J. H. Camacho Vera, J. Aguilar Ávila y J. G. Ocampo Ledesma, “Factores de innovación en agricultura protegida en la región de Tulancingo, México”, Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 826-840, may. 2015. [En línea]. Disponible en: https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/2631/263138102013.pdf
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 José Francisco Aguilar Pereira, Freddy Soto-Bravo (Autor/a)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
In order to be considered an author, the researcher must:
- Has contributed substantially in the conception or design of the research, or in the interpretation of the data.
- Has taken part in the design of the research or in the critical study of the content.
- Has taken part in the approval of the final version of the work.
- Be able to answer any question that the published work may raise.
- An “author” must meet all of the above considerations (adapted from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/translations/spanish2015.pdf)
Authors wishing to publish in this journal agree with the following terms:
- Authors conserve the copyrights over their work and let the journal be the first publication venue for their manuscripts.
- Authors agree with the Creative Commons Attribution License established by the journal which allows them to distribute their work by mentioning the initial journal where the work was published.
- Authors can establish separate agreements for non-exclusive distribution of their work (i.e. work repository) by mentioning the journal as the initial publication venue.
- Authors may publish their works electronically (e.g. in institutional repositories or in their own website) only after the journal approves and publishes the manuscript.
- As of Fascicle 26 No.1 of 2016; copyrights are the property of the authors of the documents. Prior to that date, editorial policies indicated that this right belonged to Engineering: Journal of the University of Costa Rica.
Contributor Roles Taxonomy
- Conceptualization – Ideas; formulation or evolution of overarching research goals and aims.
- Data curation – Management activities to annotate (produce metadata), scrub data and maintain research data (including software code, where it is necessary for interpreting the data itself) for initial use and later re-use.
- Formal analysis – Application of statistical, mathematical, computational, or other formal techniques to analyze or synthesize study data.
- Funding acquisition - Acquisition of the financial support for the project leading to this publication.
- Investigation – Conducting a research and investigation process, specifically performing the experiments, or data/evidence collection.
- Methodology – Development or design of methodology; creation of models.
- Project administration – Management and coordination responsibility for the research activity planning and execution.
- Resources – Provision of study materials, reagents, materials, patients, laboratory samples, animals, instrumentation, computing resources, or other analysis tools.
- Software – Programming, software development; designing computer programs; implementation of the computer code and supporting algorithms; testing of existing code components.
- Supervision – Oversight and leadership responsibility for the research activity planning and execution, including mentorship external to the core team.
- Validation – Verification, whether as a part of the activity or separate, of the overall replication/reproducibility of results/experiments and other research outputs.
- Visualization – Preparation, creation and/or presentation of the published work, specifically visualization/data presentation.
- Writing – original draft – Preparation, creation and/or presentation of the published work, specifically writing the initial draft (including substantive translation).
- Writing – review & editing – Preparation, creation and/or presentation of the published work by those from the original research group, specifically critical review, commentary or revision – including pre- or post-publication stages.