[Original en español] Science fatigue
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15517/b7ydz650Keywords:
science communication, scientific journals, researchAbstract
This editorial uses the image of fatigue in physically active people and athletes to briefly analyze some current challenges to science in general, and human movement science in particular. It offers practical and realistic solutions that could help science regain its vitality.
Downloads
References
Aragón-Vargas, L. F. (2017). ¿Qué es la ciencia y hasta dónde puede llegar? Pensar en Movimiento: Revista de Ciencias del Ejercicio y la Salud, 15(1), 1-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.15517/pensarmov.v15i1.29637
Asamblea Legislativa de Costa Rica. (2014). Ley Reguladora de Investigación Biomédica (n.º 9234). http://www.pgrweb.go.cr/scij/Busqueda/Normativa/Normas/nrm_texto_completo.aspx?param1=NRTC&nValor1=1&nValor2=77070&nValor3=96424&strTipM=TC.
Méndez, E. (2023, 19 de abril). Se nos pudre la ciencia. EL PAÍS. https://elpais.com/ciencia/2023-04-20/se-nos-pudre-la-ciencia.html#?prm=copy_link
Meyer, T. (2023). Editorial: Let’s give more value to reviewing activities. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 26(11), 639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2023.11.012
Meyer, T., Jay O., Altenburg, T., Wilson, F., Siegler, J., y Timpka, T. (2023). Where have all the reviewers gone? Discussing the importance of the peer review community. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport 26(4-5), 215-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2023.05.002
Moher, D., Bouter, L., Kleinert, S., Glasziou, P., Sham, M. H., Barbour, V., Coriat, A-M., Foeger, N., & Dirnagl, U. (2020). The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity. PLoS Biology, 18(7), e3000737 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2025). Simplifying Research Regulations and Policies: Optimizing American Science. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/29231.
O’Grady, C. (2017, 21 de abril). 107 cancer papers retracted due to peer review fraud. arsTECHNICA. https://arstechnica.com/science/2017/04/107-cancer-papers-retracted-due-to-peer-review-fraud/
O’Grady, C. (2025). Study reveals industrial-scale publishing fraud. Science, 389(6760), 557-558. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aeb2398
Quaderi, N. (2023, 20 de marzo). Supporting integrity of the scholarly record: Our commitment to curation and selectivity in the Web of Science. https://clarivate.com/academia-government/blog/supporting-integrity-of-the-scholarly-record-our-commitment-to-curation-and-selectivity-in-the-web-of-science/?utm_medium=Referral&utm_source=www-vut-cz
Richardson, R. A. K., Hong, S. S., Byrne, J. A. Stoeger, T., y Amaral, L. A. N. (2025). The entities enabling scientific fraud at scale are large, resilient, and growing rapidly. Proceedings of the National Academies of Science of the U.S.A., 122(32), e2420092122. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2420092122.
Stigbrand, T. (2017). Retraction Note to multiple articles in Tumor Biology. Tumor Biology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-017-5487-6
Teixeira da Silva, J. A., y Scelles, N. (2023). An artificial intelligence tool misclassifies sport science journals as predatory. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 27(4), 266-269.
