Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Scientific Papers

Vol. 18 No. 32 (2016): Journal 32

Behavioral Interactional Model of Traffic: Diagnostic Algorithm

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15517/ex4xmm85
Submitted
November 6, 2025
Published
2025-11-07

Abstract

The aim of this article is to present a new theoretical and technical perspective which coordinates knowledge as well as disciplinary, though dissimilar, fields that are necessary and complementary for the analysis and understanding of the complexity of all situations and events relating to transit and road safety. On the one hand, the conceptual principles of Trans-System Transit and Road Safety and the Interactional Behavioural Transit Model are set out; on the other hand, there follows the technical development, in order to obtain a synthesizing point, or points, which will allow us to define such system based on four conditions. The value is obtained using an algorithm that proposes the intersection of lines on a plane of Cartesian axes. It has been run with MATLAB IM software, resulting in graphics which make it possible to diagnose ("path diagnosis") the Trans-System Transit and Road Safety, through the Interactional Behavioural Transit Model, linking physical elements such as road infrastructure, and behaviours such as behaviour in urban drivers.
The theory and the technique result from a fragile interaction between actors (psychosocial environment) and physical elements (physical environment), based on the irreducible structure of their components, and keeping the distinction between such actors and physical elements in a dialectical association of interdependence and integrity that includes dissimilar extremes: Behavioural System and System of Physical Elements.

References

  1. Huguenin, R., & Rumar, K. (2001). Models in Traffic Psychology. En P. E. Barjonnet (Ed.), Traffic Psychology Today (pp. 31-62). Boston: Kluwer Academic publishers.
  2. Iversen, H. (2004). Risk-taking attitudes and risky driving behaviour. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 7(3), 135-150.
  3. Izquierdo, J. D. D. & Torres, R. D. (2009). Hacia una sociología de la seguridad vial: Del "factor humano" al "Factor social". Praxis sociológica, 13, 148-172.
  4. Izquierdo, J. D. D., Torres, R. D. & Martínez, L. (2013). Control social del tráfico y empoderamiento social. Grupos de riesgo: jóvenes y mayores. Barataria. Revista Castellano-Manchega de Ciencias Sociales, 16, 161-176.
  5. Ledesma, R.D., Poó, EM. & Montes, S.A. (2011). Psicología del tránsito: logros y desafíos de la investigación. PSIENCIA. Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencia Psicológica, 3(2), 108-119.
  6. Lopez-Araujo, B. & Osca Segovia, A. (2007). Factores explicativos de la accidentalidad en jóvenes: Un análisis de la investigación. Revista de Estudios de Jóvenes, 79, 75-89.
  7. Michon, J. A. (1985). A critical review of driver behaviour models: What do we know, what should we do? En L. Evans & R. C. Schwing (Eds.), Human behaviour and traffic safety (pp. 487-525). New York: Plenum Press.
  8. Näätänen, R. & Summala, H. (1974). A model for the role of motivational factors in drivers' decision-making. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 6, 243-261.
  9. Persaud, B., Lord, D. & Palmisano, J. (2002). Calibration and Transferability of Accident Prediction Models for Urban Intersections. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1784, 57-64.
  10. Petit, L. (2014). El factor humano en el Sistema Tránsito y Seguridad Vial y el Modelo Interaccional Comportamental de Tránsito. PSIENCIA. Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencia Psicológica, 6(1), 48-54.
  11. Petit, L. (2015). Sistema tránsito y seguridad vial. Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires: Editorial Universidad Abierta Interamericana.
  12. Reason, J. (1990) Human Error: Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  13. Rothengatter, I. (1997). Psychological aspects of road user behaviour. Applied Psychology: an International Review, 46, 223-234.
  14. Wilde, G. J. S. (1982). The theory of risk homeostasis: implications for safety and health. Risk Analysis, 2, 209-225.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.