Abstract
The editorial process of a journal, specifically peer review, validates the scientific publication supported by the experience and knowledge of the reviewers. However, despite the fact that there are programs that instruct members of the scientific community in research, there are few training tools to participate in the arbitration of a manuscript. The purpose of this article was to present a guide with a series of recommendations on how a scientific article should be peer-reviewed. A synopsis of recommendations and criteria is presented and will be used by the reviewers of Odovtos-International Journal of Dental Sciences as a reference to support their work.
References
Lippi G. How do I peer-review a scientific article?-a personal perspective. Ann Transl Med. 2018; 6 (3):68.
Mayden K.D. Peer review: publication's gold standard. J Adv Pract Oncol. 2012; 3: 117-22.
Gasparyan A.Y., Kitas G.D. Best peer reviewers and the quality of peer review in biomedical journals. Croat Med J. 2012; 53: 386-9.
Jefferson T., Rudin M., Brodney Folse S., et al. Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007; (2): MR000016.
Mc Peek M., et al. The Golden Rule of Reviewing. Am. Nat. 2009;173:E155-E158.
Hames, Irene. Peer review and manuscript management in scientific journals: guidelines for good practice. John Wiley & Sons, 2008.
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: writing and editing for biomedical publication. Disponible en: http://www.icmje.org/[Consultado: 14 de marzo de 2021].
What is peer review? Elsevier. Disponible en: https://www.elsevier.com/reviewers/what-is-peer-review [Consultado: 12 de marzo de 2021].
Peer Review Process. Odovtos, About the journal. Disponible en:https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/Odontos/about [Consultado: 14 de marzo de 2021].
Council of Science Editors. Reviewer roles and responsibilities. Available online: https://www.councilscienceeditors.org/resource-library/editorial-policies/white-paper-on-publication-ethics/2-3-reviewer-roles-andresponsibilities/