Abstract
Prognosis is the prediction of the probable course of a disease. Assigning a prognosis to a particular tooth, offers critical information for the develop- ment of a treatment plan. The aim is to restore and/or maintain suitable conditions for dental function. Prognosis constitutes one of the most important decision functions in dentistry, and it will determine the success of the periodontal treatment.
The patient must know the condition of his/her teeth, in order to take part in the decisions, participate in take note of the difference and become moti- vated by the changes seen before and after the treatment. Prognosis establishes a projection during time, based on previous success and failures which have been properly, making this application a valuable experience.
References
Becker, W. et al. Periodontal treatment without maintenance. A restrospective study in 44 patients. J Periodontology. 1984. 505- 509.
Becker, W. et al. The long term evaluation of periodontal treat- ment and maintenance in 95 patients. Journal of perio-prost.1984. 55-71.
Becker, W., Berg, L. & Becker, B.E. (1979). Untreated periodon- tal disease: a longitudinal study. Journal of Periodontology 50, 234-244.
Cortellini, Pini Prato, Tonetti. Periodontal regeneration of hu- man infrabony defects.lire entry procedures and bone measures. J Periodontol. 1993, 64:261.
Hirschfeld, L. et al. A long term survey of tooth loss in 600 treated periodontal patients. J Periodontol. 1978: 225-237.
Kwok,V. Caton, J. Prognosis revisted: a system for assigning periodontal prognosis. J Periodontol. 2007; 78: 2063-2071.
Lindhe, J. & Nyman, S. (1984). Long-term maintenance of patients treated for advanced periodontal disease. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 11(8), 504-514.
Maguire, M. et al. Prognosis versus actual outcome III. The effectiveness of clinical parameters in accurately predicting tooth survival. J Periodontol. 1996; 67: 666-674.
Maguire, M. Prognosis versus actual outcome: a long-term Surrey of 100 treated periodontal patients under maintenance care. J Periodontol. 1991; 62:51-58.
Matuliene, G. et al. Influence of residual pockets on progression of periodontitis and tooth loss: results after 11 years of maintanence. J Clin Periodontol. 2008; 35: 685-695.
Matuliene, Pjetursson. Influence of residual pocket on progression f periodontitis and tooth loss: results after 11 years of maintenance. J Clinic Periodontol. 2008; 35: 685.
McFall, W. Tooth loss in 100 treated patients with periodontal disease. A long term study. J Periodontol. 1982. 539-549.
McGuire MK, Nunn ME. Prognosis versus actual outcome. II. The effectivess of clinical parameters in developing an accurate prognosis. J Periodontol 1996;67:658-665.
Niere, M. et al. The prognosis value of several periodontal factors measured as radiographic bone level variation: a10 year retrospective multilevel analisys of treated and maintenance periodontal patients. J Periodontol; 73: 1458-1493.
Numm, Harrel. Longitudinal comparison of the periodontal status of patients with moderate to severe periodontal disease re- ceiving no treatment, non surgical tratment utilizing individual site for analysis. J Periodontol. 2001;72: 1509.
Nyman, Gottlow, Karring. New attachment formation by guided tissue regenereation. J Periodont Research 1987;22: 252.
Ridway, Hk., Melloning Jt., Cochran Dl., Cochran DL.Human histologic and clinical evaluation of recombinant human plate- let-derived growth factor and beta-tricalcium phosphate for the treatment of periodontal intraosseous defects. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2008 Apr;28(2):171-9.