Resumen
Las carillas de cerámica son consideradas, alternativas viables en comparación con los procedimientos clásicos invasivos, utilizados en los tratamientos dentales. Las técnicas de unión adhesiva, combinadas con materiales similares al color natural del diente, forman parte de, los grandes logros alcanzados dentro de la odontología estética moderna. Las carillas de cerámica fabricadas estructuralmente a partir de materiales vítreos reforzados con disilicato de litio, son seleccionadas con frecuencia para restaurar y estabilizar la biomecánica del diente, sugiriéndose específicamente desde, la indicación de piezas dentales con insuficiente tejido de esmalte, hasta, la presencia de malformaciones dentales como, dientes conoides. El presente artículo explicará, los principios básicos aplicados en la tecnología avanzada para diseñar carillas de cerámica con subestructuras de soporte “coppings”, en disilicato de litio, permitiendo observar, el proceso de cobertura con cerámica feldespática en el laboratorio y el resultado final del procedimiento clínico, en la cementación. Explorará el pronóstico a largo plazo de carillas de cerámica según la información fundamentada en una serie de estudios científicos con base en evidencia científica.
Citas
Pincus C. R. Building mouth personality. J Calif Dent Assoc 1938; 14: 125-129.
Buonocore M.G. A simple method for increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 1955; 34: 849-853.
Bowen R. L. Use of epoxy resins in restorative materials. J Dent Res 1956; 35: 360 369.
Gwinnett A. J., Buonocore M. G. Adhesive and caries prevention. A preliminary report. 1965; 119: 77-81.
Bailey L. F., Bennett R. J. DICOR surface treatments foren hanced bonding. JDent Res 1988; 67: 925-931.
Calamia J.R. Etched porcelain facial veneers: a new treatment modality based on scientific and clinical evidence. NY J Dent 1983; 53: 225-229.
Layton D.M., Clarke M.A. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the survival of non-feldspathic porcelain veneers over 5 and 10 years. Int J Prosthodont 2013; 26: 111-124.
Friedman M.J. A 15-year review of porcelain veneer failure: a clinician’s observations. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1998; 19: 625-628.
Sorensen J.A., Strutz J.M., Avera S.P., Materdomini D. Marginal fidelity and microleakage of porcelain veneers made by two techniques. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 67: 16-22.
Fradeani M., Barducci G. Versatility of IPS Empress restorations. Part II: Veneers, inlays, and onlays. J Esthet Dent 1996; 8:.170-176.
Fradeani M., Redemagni M., Corrado M. Porcelain laminate veneers: 6- to 12-year clinical evaluation: a retrospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2005; 25: 9-17.
Wiedhahn K., Kerschbaum T., Fasbinder D.F. Clinical long-term results with 617 Cerec veneers: a nine-year report. Int J Comput Dent 2005; 8: 233-246.
Lawson N.C., Bansal R., Burgess J.O. Wear, strength, modulus and hardness of CAD/CAM restorative materials. Dent Mater 2016; 32: e275-e283.
Goodkind R.J., Schwabacher W.B. Use of a fiber-optic colorimeter for in vivo color measurements of 2830 anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1987; 58: 535-542.
Chu S.J.,Mieleszko A.J.Color-matching strategies fornon-vital discolored teeth: part 1. Laboratory ceramic veneer fabrication solutions. J Esthet Restor Dent 2014; 26: 240-246.
Gresnigt M.M., Kalk W., Ozcan M. Randomized clinical trial of indirect resin composite and ceramic veneers: up to 3-year follow-up. J Adhes Dent 2013; 15: 181-190.
Kappert H.F., Krah M. Keramik – eine Übersicht. Quintessenz Zahntechnik 2001; 27: 668-704.
Beier U.S., Kapferer I., Burtscher D., Dumfahrt H. Clinical performance of porcelain laminate veneers for up to 20 years. Int J Prosthodont 2012; 25: 79-85.
Layton D.M., Walton T.R. The up to 21-year clinical outcome and survival of feldspathic porcelain veneers: accounting for clustering. Int J Prosthodont 2012; 25: 604-612
Peumans M., van Meerbeek B., Lambrechts P., Vanherle G. Porcelain veneers: a review of the literature. J Dent 2000; 28: 163-177.
Magne P., Gallucci G.O., Belser U.C. Anatomic crown width/length ratios of unworn and worn maxillary teeth in white subjects. J Prosthet Dent 2003; 89: 453-461.
Faus-Matoses I., Solá-Ruiz F. Dental preparation with sonic vs high-speed finishing: analysis of microleakage in bonded veneer restorations. J Adhes Dent 2014; 16: 29-34.
Belleflamme M. M., Geerts S. O., Louwette M. M., Grenade C. F., Vanheusden A. J., Mainjot A. K. No post-no core approach to restore severly damaged posterior teeth: An up to 10-year retrospective study of documented endocrown cases; J Dent 2017; 63: 1-7.
Belli R., Petschelt A., Hofner B., Hajto J., Sherrer S. S., Lohbauer U. Fracture Rates and lifetime estimations of CAD/CAM all-ceramic restorations. J Dent Res 2016; 95: 67-73.
Guess P. C., Selz C. F., Steinhart Y. N., Stampf S., Strub J. R. Prospective clinical split-mouth study of pressed and CAD/CAM all-ceramic partial-coverage restorations: 7-year results. Int J Prosthodont 2013; 26: 21-25.
Clausen J. O., Tara M. A., Kern M. Dynamic fatigue and fracture resistance of non-retentive all-ceramic full-coverage molar restorations. Influence of ceramic materials and preparation design. Dent Mater 2010; 26: 533-538.
Ma Li, Guess P. C., Zhang Y. Load-bearing properties of minimal-invasive monolithic disilicate and zirconia occlusal onlays: Finite element and theoretical analyses. Dent Mater 2013; 29: 742-751.
Magne P., Schlichting L. H., Maia H. P., Baratieri L. N. In vitro fatigue resistance of CAD/CAM composite resin and ceramic posterior occlusal veneers. J Prosthet Dent 2010; 104: 149-157.
Magne P., Stanley K., Schlichting L. H. Modeling of ultra thin occlusal veneers. Dent Mater 2012; 28: 777-782.
Milichic G. The compression dome concept: the restorative implications. Gen Dent 2017; 65: 55-60.
Politano G., Fabianelli A., Papacchini F., Cerutti A. The use of bonded partial ceramic restorations to recover healthy compromised teeth. Int J Esthet Dent 2016; 11: 314-336.
Sasse M., Krummel A., Klosa K., Kern M. Influence of restoration thickness and dental bonding surface on the fracture resistance of full-coverage occlusal veneers made from lithium disilicate. Dent Mater 2015; 31: 907-915.
Wendler M., Belli R., Valladares D., Petschelt A., Lohbauer U. Chairside CAD/CAM materials. Part 3: Cyclic fatigue parameters and lifetime predictions. Dent Mater 2018; 34: 910-921.
Xu B., Chen X., Li R, Wang Y., Li Q. Agreement of try-in pastes and the corresponding luting composites on the final color of ceramic veneers. J Prostho- dont 2014; 23: 308-312.
Barghi N., Berry T., Chung K. Effects of timing and heat treatment of silanated porcelain on the bond strength. J Oral Rehabil 2000; 27: 407-412.
Gregor L., Bouillaguet S., Onisor I., Ardu S., Krejci I., Rocca G. T. Microhardness of light-and dual-polymerizable luting resins polymerized through 7.5mm-thick endocrowns. J Prosthet Dent 2014; 112: 942-948.
Gresnigt M. M. M., Cune M. S., de Roos J. G., Ozcan M. Effect of immediate and delayed dentin sealing on the fracture strength, failure type and Weibull characteristics of lithium disilicate laminate veneers. Dent Mater 2016; 32: e73-81.
Molin M. K., Karlsson S. L., Kristiaensen M. S. Influence of film thickness on joint bend strength of a ceramic/resin composite joint. Dent Mater 1996; 12: 245-249.
Silva N. R., de Souza G. M., Coelho P. G., Stappert C. F., Clark E. A., Rekow E. D., Thompson V. P. Effect of water storage time and composite cement thick- ness on fatigue of a glass-ceramic trilayer system. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2008; 84: 117-123.
Cekic-Nagas I., Canay S., Sahin E. Bonding of resin core materials to lithium disilicate ceramics: the effect of resin cement film thickness. Int J Prosthodont 2010; 23: 469- 471.
Roggendorf M.J., Kunzi K., Eber J., Roggendorf H.C., Frankenberger R., Reich S.M. Seven-year clinical performance of CEREC 2 all-ceramic CAD/CAM restorations places within deeply destroyed teeth. Clin Oral Invest 2012; 16: 1413-1424.