Palavras-chave
teoria social cognitiva
habilidades motoras
aprendizagem motora
Self-efficacy
social cognitive theory
motor skills
motor learning
Como Citar
Resumo
Objetivo. Fornecer uma visão abrangente da literatura, focando na influência da autoeficácia no desempenho e aprendizagem de habilidades motoras em adultos. Método. Revisão sistemática da literatura examinando estudos indexados nas bases de dados PubMed, Cochrane, Scielo, PsycArticles e Pepsic. Foram extraídas as seguintes características dos artigos selecionados: autores e ano de publicação, periódico de publicação, hipótese (variáveis teste e critério), revelou características da amostra e risco de viés através da escala PEDro. Resultados. A análise dos dezesseis estudos revela uma associação positiva entre autoeficácia e desempenho motor, e em alguns estudos, com a aprendizagem. As estratégias utilizadas para influenciar a autoeficácia variaram consideravelmente entre os estudos. Não há consenso sobre a melhor abordagem para influenciar a interpretação desse construto no treinamento de habilidades motoras em adultos.
Referências
Azzi, R. G., & Polydoro, S. A. J. (2006). Auto-eficácia em diferentes contextos. Alínea.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological review, 84(2), 191-215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 71-81). Academic Press.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W H Freeman/Times Books/ Henry Holt & Co.
Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (Vol. 5, pp. 307-337). Information Age Publishing.
Barros, M., & Batista-dos-Santos, A. C. (2010). Por dentro da autoeficácia: Um estudo sobre seus fundamentos teóricos, suas fontes e conceitos correlatos. Revista Espaço Acadêmico, 10(112), 1-9. https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/EspacoAcademico/article/view/10818
Chiviacowsky, S. (2014). Self-controlled practice: Autonomy protects perceptions of competence and enhances motor learning. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 15(5), 505-510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2014.05.003
Chiviacowsky, S., Wulf, G., & Lewthwaite, R. (2012). Self-controlled learning: the importance of protecting perceptions of competence. Frontiers in psychology, 3, 458. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00458
Chung, Y. C., Lewthwaite, R., Winstein, C. J., Monterosso, J. R., & Fisher, B. E. (2020). Expectancy and affective response to challenging balance practice conditions in individuals with Parkinson’s disease. The European Journal of Neuroscience, 53(6), 3652-3662. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.14723
Drews, R., Pacheco, M. M., Bastos, F. H., & Tani, G. (2020). Knowledge of results do not affect self-efficacy and skill acquisition on an anticipatory timing task. Journal of Motor Behavior, 53(3), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.2020.1772711
Drews, R., Pacheco, M. M., Bastos, F. H., & Tani, G. (2021). Effects of normative feedback on motor learning are dependent on the frequency of knowledge of results. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 55(7), 101950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2021.101950
Gauggel, S., & Fischer, S. (2001). The effect of goal setting on motor performance and motor learning in brain-damaged patients. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 11(1), 33-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/09602010042000150
Ghorbani, S., & Bund, A. (2020). Motivational effects of enhanced expectancies for motor learning in individuals with high and low self-efficacy. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 127(1), 263-274. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031512519892390
Hooyman, A., Wulf, G., & Lewthwaite, R. (2014). Impacts of autonomy-supportive versus controlling instructional language on motor learning. Human movement science, 36, 190–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2014.04.005
Lebeau, J. C., Gatten, H., Perry, I., Wang, Y., Sung, S., & Tenenbaum, G. (2018). Is failing the key to success? A randomized experiment investigating goal attainment effects on cognitions, emotions, and subsequent performance. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 38, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.05.005
Légal, J. B., & Meyer, T. (2009). Goal priming and self-efficacy: independent contributions to motor performance. Perceptual and motor skills, 108(2), 383-391. https://doi.org/10.2466/PMS.108.2.383-391
Ong, N. T., & Hodges, N. J. (2018). Balancing our perceptions of the efficacy of success-based feedback manipulations on motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 50(6), 614-630. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.2017.1383227
Ong, N. T., Hawke, J., & Hodges, N. J. (2019). Target Size manipulations affect error-processing duration and success perceptions but not behavioural indices of learning. Brain Sciences, 9(5), 119. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci9050119
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372(71), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Pascua, L. A., Wulf, G., & Lewthwaite, R. (2015). Additive benefits of external focus and enhanced performance expectancy for motor learning. Journal of Sports Sciences, 33(1), 58-66. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2014.922693
PEDro. (n. d.). Physiotherapy Evidence Database. http://www.pedro.org.au
Picha, K. J., Lester, M., Heebner, N. R., Abt, J. P., Usher, E. L., Capilouto, G., & Uhl, T. L. (2019). The self-efficacy for home exercise programs scale: Development and psychometric properties. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 49(9), 647-655. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2019.8779
Shafizadeh, M., Platt, G. K., & Bahram, A. (2013). Effects of focus of attention and type of practice on learning and self-efficacy in dart throwing. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 117(1), 1224–1234. https://doi.org/10.2466/25.30.pms.117x12z5
Shuggi, I. M., Oh, H., Wu, H., Ayoub, M. J., Moreno, A., Shaw, E. P., Shewokis, P. A., & Gentili, R. J. (2019). Motor performance, mental workload and self-efficacy dynamics during learning of reaching movements throughout multiple practice sessions. Neuroscience, 423, 232-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.07.001
Stevens, D., Anderson, D. I., O’Dwyer, N. J., & Mark Williams, A. (2012). Does self-efficacy mediate transfer effects in the learning of easy and difficult motor skills? Consciousness and Cognition, 21(3), 1122-1128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2012.03.014
World Health Organization. (2005). Envelhecimento ativo: uma política de saúde. Organização Pan-Americana de Saúde.
World Health Organization. (2020). Decade of healthy ageing: baseline report. World Health Organization.
Wulf, G., Chiviacowsky, S., & Cardozo, P. L. (2014). Additive benefits of autonomy support and enhanced expectancies for motor learning. Human movement science, 37, 12-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2014.06.004
Wulf, G., Chiviacowsky, S., & Drews, R. (2015). External focus and autonomy support: two important factors in motor learning have additive benefits. Human Movement Science, 40, 176-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2014.11.015
Wulf, G., & Lewthwaite, R. (2016). Optimizing performance through intrinsic motivation and attention for learning: The OPTIMAL theory of motor learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(5), 1382-1414. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0999-9
Comentários
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2024 Luísa Cammarota Belo, Luciana Xavier Senra