Agronomía Costarricense ISSN Impreso: 0377-9424 ISSN electrónico: 2215-2202

OAI: https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/agrocost/oai
Body condition assessment in a grazing Jersey cows herd in the highlands of Cartago. Variations during the productive cycle
PDF (Español (España))

Keywords

body condition score
grazing dairy cows
energy reserves mobilization
calificación de condición corporal
vacas lecheras en pastoreo
movilización de reservas de energía

How to Cite

Saborío-Montero, A., & Sánchez, J. M. (2014). Body condition assessment in a grazing Jersey cows herd in the highlands of Cartago. Variations during the productive cycle. Agronomía Costarricense, 38(1). https://doi.org/10.15517/rac.v38i1.15158

Abstract

The aim of this research was to carry out a body condition score (BCS) observational study in a commercial grazing Jersey herd in Cartago, Costa Rica (9°55` N, 83°51` W, 2350 m of altitude). The study comprised 5864 BCS records from 122 cows (29 primiparous and 93 multiparous) over an 18 months period. Cows were scored weekly by the same person, from 9 th week prepartum to 43 th week postpartum. The 1 to 5 points scale was used (1=emaciated, 5=obese). Animal feeding practices were based on intensive grazing of 30 d regrowth kikuyu (Kikuyuocloa clandestina) and supplementation of a balanced concentrate according to physiological stage. Primiparous and multiparous cows BCS at calving was 4.01 points (95% CI: 3.80-4.22 points) and 3.83 points (95% CI: 3.71-3.94 points) respectively, BCS nadir after calving differed (p<0.05) between primiparous (3.10 points; 95% CI: 2.97-3.23 points) and multiparous cows (2.86 points; 95% CI: 2.76-2.96 points). When stratifying BCS at calving into values ≤3.25, 3.50 to 4.00 and ≥4.25 points, differences (p<0.01) were found in nadir and BCS change extreme values within primiparous or multiparous groups of cows. Animals that calved with higher BCS lost more BCS post calving, but remained at a greater BCS at nadir and the whole lactation. Results suggest that BCS at calving could be used as a partial indicator of BCS nadir and BCS change from calving to nadir, which has important implications on production and fertility of cows.
https://doi.org/10.15517/rac.v38i1.15158
PDF (Español (España))

References

BANOS G., BROTHERSTONE S., COFFEY M.P. 2004. Evaluation of body condition score measured throughout lactation as an indicator of fertility in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 87:2669-2676.

BAUMAN D.E., CURRIE W.B. 1980. Partitioning of nutrients during pregnancy and lactation: a review of mechanisms involving homeostasis and homeorhesis. J. Dairy Sci. 63:1514-1529.

BUTLER W.R., SMITH R.D. 1989. Interrelationships between energy balance and postpartum reproductive function in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 72:767-783.

COLEMAN J., PIERCE K.M., BERRY D.P., BRENNAN A., HORAN B. 2010. Increasing milk solids production across lactation through genetic selection and intensive pasture based feed system. J. Dairy Sci. 93:4302-4317.

DOMECQ J.J., SKIDMORE A.L., LLOYD J.W., KANEENE J.B. 1997. Relationship between body condition scores and milk yield in a large dairy herd of high yielding Holstein cows. J. Dairy Sci. 80:101-112.

EDMONSON A.J., LEAN I.J., WEAVER L.D., FARVER T., WEBSTER G. 1989. A body condition scoring chart of Holstein dairy cows, J. Dairy Sci. 72:68-78.

FERGUSON J.D., GALLIGAN D.T., THOMSEN N. 1994. Principal descriptors of body condition score in Holstein cows. J. Dairy Sci. 77:2695-2703.

FERGUSON J.D., OTTO K.A. 1989. Managing body condition in cows. Proc. Cornell Nutr. Conf. Feed Manuf. Conf. pp. 75-87.

FRENCH P.D. 2006. Dry matter intake and blood parameters of non lactating Holstein and Jersey cows in late gestation. J. Dairy Sci. 89:1057-1061.

GALLO L., CARNIER P., CASSANDRO M., MANTOVANI R., BAILONI L., CONTIERO B., BITTANTTE G. 1996. Change in body condition score of Holstein cows as affected by parity and mature equivalent milk yield. J. Dairy Sci. 79:1009-1015.

GILLUND P., REKSEN O., GRÖHN K., KARLBERG. 2001. Body condition related to ketosis and reproductive performance in Norwegian dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 84:1390-1396.

GRUMMER R.R. 1995. Impact of changes in organic nutrient metabolism on feeding the transition dairy cow. J. Anim. Sci. 73:2820–2833.

HAYIRLI A., GRUMMER R.R., NORDHEIM E.V., CRUMP P.M. 2002. Animal and dietary factors affecting feed intake during the prefresh transition period in Holstein. J. Dairy Sci. 85:3430-3443.

MARQUARDT J.P., HORST R.L., JORGENSON N.A. 1977. Effect of parity on dry matter intake at parturition in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 60:929-934.

McCARTHY B., PIERCE K.M., DELABY L., BRENNAN A., HORAN B. 2012. The effect of stocking rate and calving date on reproductive performance, body state, and metabolic and health parameters of Holstein-Friesian dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 95:1337-1348.

NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL. 2001. Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. 7th rev. ed. National Academy Press. Washington, D.C. 381 p.

PEDRON O., CHELI F., SENATORE E., BAROLI D., RIZZI R. 1993. Effect of body condition score at calving on performance, some blood parameters, and milk fatty acid composition in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 76:2528-2535.

RASTANI R.R., ANDREW S.M., ZINN S.A., SNIFFEN C.J. 2001. Body condition an estimated tissue energy balance in Jersey and Holstein cows during early lactation. J. Dairy Sci. 84:1201-1209.

ROCHE J.R., Berry D.P., Lee J.M., MACdonald K.A., Boston R.C. 2007a. Describing the body condition score change between successive calvings: a novel strategy generalizable to diverse cohorts. J. Dairy. Sci. 90:4378-4396.

ROCHE J.R., FRIGGENS N.C., KAY J.K., FISHER M.W., STAFFORD K.J., BERRY D.P. 2009. Invited Review: Body condition score and its associations with dairy cow productivity, health, and welfare. J. Dairy. Sci. 92:5769 5801.

ROCHE J.R., LEE J.M., MACDONALD K.A., BERRY D.P. 2007b. relationships among body condition score, body weight, and milk production variables in pasture-based dairy cows. J. Dairy. Sci. 90:3802-3815.

SABORÍO-MONTERO A., SÁNCHEZ J.M. 2013. Prevalencia y factores de riesgo relacionados con la cetosis clínica y subclínica Tipo I y II en un hato de vacas Jersey en Costa Rica. Agronomía Costarricense 37(2):17-29.

SÁNCHEZ J.M. 2007. Utilización eficiente de las pasturas tropicales en la alimentación del ganado lechero, pp. 1-24. In: XI Seminario de pastos y forrajes en sistemas de producción animal. Barquisimeto, Venezuela.

VAN SAUN R.J. 1991. Dry cow nutrition: the key to improving fresh cow performance. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice. Vol. 7. W.B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia, PA. p 599.

WALTNER S.S., McNAMARA J.P., HILLERS J.K. 1994. Validation of indirect measures of body fat in lactating cows. J. Dairy Sci. 77:2570-2579.

WILDMAN E.E., JONES G.M., WAGNER P.E., BOMAN R.L., TROUT H.F., LESCH T.N. 1982. A dairy cow body condition scoring system and its relationships to standard production characteristics. J. Dairy Sci. 65:495-501.

ZEBELI Q., ASCHENB J.R., TAJAF M., BOGUHN J., AMETAJ B.N., DROCHNER W. 2008. Invited review: role of physically effective fiber and estimation of dietary fiber adequacy in highproducing dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 95:1041-1056.

Comments

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.