General and specific combining ability of tropical and subtropical maize (Zea mays) lines.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15517/am.v16i2.11866Keywords:
Lines, testers, GCA, SCA, hybrids.Abstract
Twenty maize
lines were crossed with six inbreds used as testers, with the
objective of examining their general and specific combining
ability and determine their usefulness in a hybridization
program. The crosses were evaluated in three environments
at Mexico during 1997. General combining ability (GCA)
and specific combining ability (SCA) effects were calculated
using a Line x Tester analysis. CML264 (1586 kg/ha) and
CML319 (1285 kg/ha) were the highest GCA lines in the
tropical and subtropical group, respectively. The highest
SCA effects were for the crosses CML322 x M.L.S4-1 (1651
kg/ha) and CML258 x SSE255-18-19 (1512 kg/ha). These
results indicate that it is possible to develop a hybrid program
using the best lines released by the International Maize and
Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), and the best testers
from UAAAN.
Downloads
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
1. Proposed policy for open access journals
Authors who publish in this journal accept the following conditions:
a. Authors retain the copyright and assign to the journal the right to the first publication, with the work registered under the attribution, non-commercial and no-derivative license from Creative Commons, which allows third parties to use what has been published as long as they mention the authorship of the work and upon first publication in this journal, the work may not be used for commercial purposes and the publications may not be used to remix, transform or create another work.
b. Authors may enter into additional independent contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (e.g., including it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book) provided that they clearly indicate that the work was first published in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to publish their work on the Internet (e.g. on institutional or personal pages) before and during the review and publication process, as it may lead to productive exchanges and faster and wider dissemination of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).