Assesment of economic indicators for cow and calf production in Chihuahua state, México.


  • Nicolás Callejas-Juárez Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua, Facultad de Zootecnia y Ecología
  • Heriberto Aranda-Gutiérrez Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua, Facultad de Zootecnia y Ecología
  • Samuel Rebollar-Rebollar Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Centro Universitario UAEM Temascaltepec
  • Martha Leticia de la Fuente-Martínez Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua, Facultad de Zootecnia y Ecología



cow-calf systems, herd size, beef cattle, calves at weaning.


The objective of this work was to evaluate the microeconomic situation through the use of efficiency indicators, technical, economic and financial for production representative units (PRU) in cow-calf systems. Four scales of production (20, 40, 200 and 500 sows) comprising individuals in reproductive age were analyzed in four regions of the state of Chihuahua, Mexico. By using a panel methodology, costs and revenues were obtained during 2009 with the participation of 5-10 panel producers. We used the MEXSIM economic simulation model of the University of Texas A&M, which had been previously adapted to Mexico by the National Network of Public Policy Research. It was found that the economic viability, as measured by the probability of negative ending cash reserves and capital loss, is good for CHBC20, CHBC200 and CHBC500 and moderate for CHBC40. The lowest net income per sow was at CHBC40 ($ 27,76) while the highest was for CHBC20 ($ 403,42), and the best and worst benefit-cost ratios were 2.16 and 1.78 for CHBC500 and CHBC200, respectively. All PRUs obtained sufficient net income to cover family expenses, except for CHBC20, which only covered 70% of all expenses. The URP more scale were more profitable than small and all worked on their balance point. In fact profit margins were greater the greater the production scale, which suggests evidence of economies of scale.


Download data is not yet available.


Aksoy, A., M. Kulekci, y T. Erem. 2009. An econometric analysis for future of cattle. A case study in Erzurum, Turkey. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances 8(2):348-349.

Banco Mundial. 2007. Informe sobre el desarrollo mundial 2008. Agricultura para el desarrollo. (Consultado 5 agosto 2011).

Chauvet, M. 1997. La ganadería mexicana frente al fin de siglo. Departamento de Sociología, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana Azcapotzalco, México.

Delgado, C., C. Narrod, y M. Tiongco. 2008. Determinants and implications of the growing scale of livestock farms in four fast-growing developing countries. Research Report 157. IFPRI, Washington, D.C., USA.

FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). 2009. El estado mundial de la agricultura y la alimentación: la ganadería, a examen. Viale delle Terme di Caracalla. 0013 Roma, Italia. (Consultado 11 marzo 2011).

FAO. 2013. Ganadería primaria.

faostat-gateway/go/to/download/Q/QL/E. (Consultado 25 nov. 2013)

Hamilton, T. 2006. Factsheet. Beef bull fertility. No. 89-087.

Ween’s printer for Ontario. Canadá.

Osuna, S. 2003. La problemática de la ganadería en México.

En: IX Encuentro Nacional de Legisladores del sector Agropecuario de México. Nuestro Congreso. Órgano Informativo del Congreso del Estado de Sinaloa. p. 86-90.

Richardson, J., J. Outlaw, G. Knapek, J. Raulston, D.

Herbst, H. Anderson, S. Bryant, y P. Zimmer. 2011. Representative farms economic outlook for the January 2011. FAPRI/AFPC Baseline, USA.

Rodríguez, C. 2008. Suplementación práctica de ganado

bovino en pastoreo. Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua.

Facultad de Zootecnia y Ecología. Secretaría de extensión y Difusión. Manual técnico No. 8. México

Sartwelle, J.D., J.L. Outlaw, y J.W. Richardson. 1986. Financial impacts of regional differences in beef cattle operations. Selected paper prepared for presentation at the Southern Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meetings, Orlando, Florida, USA.

SIAP (Sistema de información agropecuaria). 2013.

Mercados nacionales e internacionales. (Consultado 26 sep. 2013).

SEMARNAT (Secretaría del Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales). 2010. Compendio de estadísticas ambientales. SAGARPA. Comité Técnico Consultivo de Coeficientes de Agostadero (Cotecoca). Junio 2009. (Consultado 20 enero 2011).

SNIIM (Sistema Nacional de Información e Integración de

Mercados). 2013. Mercados del exterior. (Consultado 6 sep. 2013).

Tinoco, R., D. Martínez, R. García, G. Hernández, y S. Mora.

Aplicación de un sistema de demanda casi ideal (AIDS) a cortes de carnes de bovino, porcino, pollo, huevo y tortilla en el periodo de 1995-2008. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Pecuarias (2)1:39-51.

Urs, P., y J. Workman. 1997. Comparative profitability of

cattle and wildlife ranches in semi-arid Zimbabwe. Journal of Arid Enviroments 35:171-187.

United States Department of Agriculture. 2007. Census of

agriculture. United States summary and state data. Volume 1. Geographic Area Series. Part 51. AC-07-A-51. Updated December 2009. USA

How to Cite

Callejas-Juárez, N., Aranda-Gutiérrez, H., Rebollar-Rebollar, S., & de la Fuente-Martínez, M. L. (2014). Assesment of economic indicators for cow and calf production in Chihuahua state, México. Agronomía Mesoamericana, 25(1), 133–139.

Most read articles by the same author(s)