Production and quality of mulberry (Morus alba) harvested with different pruning techniques.

Authors

  • Carlos Boschini Universidad de Costa Rica, Estación Experimental Alfredo Volio Mata, Facultad de Agronomía.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15517/am.v12i2.17230

Abstract

A plantation established in 1993 with 60 cm, 90 cm and 120 cm between rows, was harvested 60 cm above the ground, 26 times at different pruning intervals between 56 and 112 days. Three pruning techniques were used: control, semi-clean and completely clean. Every 84th day of growth, the shoots were harvested and the total content of dry material, crude protein, neutral detergent fiber and ash were analyzed. The semiclean pruning caused a 10% loss in the production of dry leaf material per hectare and a 13% in the stem yield, compared to the control. The joint harvest of leaves and stems decreased 11%. The completely clean pruning caused a 32% decline in the yield of dry material in the leaves per hectare and 36% in stem production, compared to the control. The total yield decreased 33%. The nutritional quality of the shoots, leaves and stems was similar among the different pruning techniques.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A.O.A.C. (Association of Official Analysis Chemistry). 1980. Methods of analysis. 13th ed. Washington D.C. EUA, AOAC. p. 168.

BENAVIDES, J., BOREL, R., ESNAOLA, M.A. 1986. Evaluaci ón de la producción de forraje del árbol de morera (Morus sp.) sometido a diferentes frecuencias y altura es de corte. Inst. Centro Agronómico Tropical de Investigaci ón y Enseñanza. Resumen de las investigaciones realizadas con rumiantes menores, en el Proyecto de Sistemas de Producción Animal. Serie Técnica. Informe Técnico 67: 74-76.

BENAVIDES, J., LACHAUX, M., FUENTES, M. 1994. Efecto de la aplicación de estiércol de cabra en el suelo sobre la calidad y producción de biomasa de morera (Morus sp.). Árboles y Arbustos Forrajeros en América Central. Serie Técnica. CATIE. Informe Técnico 236 (2): 495-514.

BLANCO, R. 1992. Distancia de siembra y altura de corte en la producción y calidad del forraje de Morera ( Morus sp.) en el parcelamiento Cuyunta, Escuintla Guatemala. Guatemala. Universidad de San Carlos. 15 p.

BOSCHINI, C., DORMOND, H., CASTRO, C. 1998. Producci ón de biomasa de morera (Morus alba) en la Meseta Central de Costa Rica. Agronomía Mesoamericana 9 (2): 31-40.

BOSCHINI, C., DORMOND, H., CASTRO, C. 2000. Composici ón química de la morera (Morus alba), para uso en la alimentación animal: Densidades y frecuencias de poda. Agronomía Mesoamericana 11 (1): 41-49.

DATTA, R. 2000. Mulberry cultivation and utilization in India. FAO Electronic Conference “,Mulberry for animal production”,. May 1 to July 31, 2000. http://www- .fao.org/WAICENT/FAOINFO/AGRICULT/AGA/AGAP/ FRM/MULBERRY/ Papers/HTML/Datta.htm.

GOERING, H. K., VAN SOEST, P.J. . 1970. Forage fiber analysis (apparatus, reagents, procedures and some applications). Agricultural Handbook No. 376. Washington, DC. ARS-USDA. 76 p.

GONZÁLEZ, F. 1951. El gusano de seda y la morera. 4a ed. Madrid, España. Ministerio de Agricultura. 272 p.

IFA (INTERNATIONAL FERTILIZER INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION). 1992. IFA World Fertilizer Use Manual. Mulberry Chart. BASF. Aktiengesells-Chaft. Agricultural Research Station. Germany. p. 595-601.

LIN, J.T., YU, S.J. , HSIEH, F.K. 1994. Effects of plant spacing on the yield and chemical compositions of mulberry leaves. Journal of the Agricultural Association of China 167:43-49.

RODRÍGUEZ, C., ARIAS, R., QUIÑONES J. 1994. Efecto de la frecuencia de poda y el nivel de fertilización nitrogenada, sobre el rendimiento y calidad de la biomasa de morera (Morus sp) en el trópico seco de Guatemala. Árboles y arbustos forrajeros en América Central. Serie Técnica. CATIE. Informe Técnico 236 (2): 515- 528.

SÁNCHEZ, M.D. 2000. World distribution and utilization of mulberry, potential for animal feeding. FAO Electronic Conference “,Mulberry for animal production”,. May 1 to July 31, 2000. http://www.fao.org/WAICENT- /FAOINFO/AGRICULT/AGA/AGAP/FRM/MULBERRY/ Papers/HTML/Intro.htm.

SAS. 1985. Statistical Analysis System. SAS User´s Guide: Statistics. 5th ed. Cary, N.C., USA. SAS Institute Inc. 373 p.

SUZUKI, T., KOHNO, K. 1987. Effects of pruning on the branching habit on Morus alba L. and the abscission of the apices of the short shoots. The New Phytologist 106: 753-758.

SUZUKI, T., KITANO, M.,, KOHNO, K. 1988. Lateral bud outgrowth on decapitated shoots of low-pruned mulberry (Morus alba L.). Tree Physiology 4:53-60 p.

TAIZ, L., ZEIGER, E. 1991. Plant physiology. The Benjamin/ Cummings Publishing Company, Inc. California, USA. 645 p.

TING-ZING, Z., YUN-FAN, T., GUANG-XIEN, H., HUAIZHONG, F., BEN, MA. 1988. Mulberry cultivation. FAO Agricultural Services Bulletin 73/1. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. Rome. p. 127.

VASQUEZ, A. 1982. Estudio detallado de los suelos de la Estaci ón Experimental de Ganado Lechero El Alto. Escuela de Fitotecnia, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de Costa Rica. p. 36.

YAMASHITA, T. 1984. Effect of top pruning on stem carbohydrates reserves and foliar 14CO2 (carbon dioxide isotope) assimilation in mulberry trees during autumn. Plant and Cell Physiology 25:677-681.

YAMASHITA, T., FUJINO, A. 1986. Effects of pruning of young and old shoots on ribose bisphosphate carboxilase and other constutuents in leaves of the mulberry tree (Morus alba L.). Journal of Experimental Botany 37: 1836-1841.

YONGKANG HUO. 2000. Mulberry cultivation and utilization in China. FAO Electronic Conference “,Mulberry for animal production”,. May 1 to July 31, 2000. http://www.fao.org/WAICENT/FAOINFO/AGRICULT / A G A / A G A P / F R M / M U L B E R RY / P a - pers/HTML/YONGKANG.htm.

How to Cite

Boschini, C. (2006). Production and quality of mulberry (Morus alba) harvested with different pruning techniques. Agronomía Mesoamericana, 12(2), 175–180. https://doi.org/10.15517/am.v12i2.17230

Most read articles by the same author(s)