Ocurrencia y propiedades de Xanthomonas campestris pv. phaseoli y xanthomonas pestolíticas, epifíticas en malezas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15517/am.v1i0.25314Keywords:
Bacterias, frijol, patógenos, tizón común.Abstract
Populations of Xanthomonas campestris pv. phaseoli and other Xanthomonas occur in natural form la non symptomatic weeds. Sevently seven samples of twenty one weed species from fields Infested with common blight "Tizón común" In San Juan, Higuey, Constanza of the Dominkan Republic were evaluated. The isolationswere obtained by adding 10 ml of the buffer (12.5 mM K2PO4 + 10 mM Mg SO4, ph < 7.1). The pathogenicity tests were performed on the Dark Red Kidney bean, by inoculating plants, trifoliates and seed pods. To confirm the starch hydrolisis reaction with methyl violet and methyl green, an evaluation of the production of brown dye and thin layer chromatography for the Xanthomonadin pigment was made. Of the observed results, fourteen samples and eight species of weeds of X. campestris pv. phaseoli and 23 species of weeds of atypical Xanthomonas were found. The pathogenic isolations from leaf innoculum at two weeks the yellow zone had expanded and covered a wide area around the necrotic brown center. The bean seed pods inoculated with pathogenic isolates showed typical symptoms around ten days. All the pathogenic isolates on the leaves became pathogenic on the seed pods. None of the isolates of collected weeds after harvest. In the "Constanza" area showed any symptoms on the bean leaves. The weed samples collected from the common blight Infested fields had more pathogenic of isolates X. campestris pv. phaseolithan the samples taken from the outside ends of the fields or after harvest. We found eight weed species all belonging to six botanic families which might act as sympto-matic hosts suggests that other species could contain epiphitic X. campestris pv. phaseoli.
Downloads
References
CAFATI, C.R.; SAETTLER, A.W. 1980. Role of non-host species as alternate inoculum sources of Xanthomonas phaseoli. Plant Disease 64: 194-196.
___________; SAETTLER, A.W. 1980. Transmission of Xanthomonas phaseoli in seed of resistant and susceptible phaseolus genotypes. Phytopathology 70: 638-W.
CLAFLIN, L.F.; VIDAVER, A.K., SASSER, M. 1987. MXP, a semiselective medium for Xanthomonas campestris p.v. phaseoli. Phytopathology 77:730-734.
ELANGO, F.N.; LOZANO, J.C. 1981. Epiphytic survival of Xanthomonas manihotis on common weeds in Colombia. Proc. Fifth Int. Conf. Plant path. Bact. Cali, Colombia.
ERCOLANI, G.L.; HAGEDORN, D.J.; KELMAN, A.; RAND, R.E. 1974. Epiphytic survival of Pseudomonas syringae on hairy vetch in relation to epidemiology of bacteria brown spot of bean in Wisconsin. Phytopathology 64:1330-1339.
GARDNER, M.W. 1924. A native weed host for bacterial blight of bean. Phythology 14:340.
GITAITIS, R.D.; SASSER,MJ.; BEAVER,R.W.; McINNES,T.B.; STALL, R.E. 1987. Pectolytic xanthomonads in mixed infections with Pseudomonas syringae p.v. syringae, P. syringae p.v. tomato and Xanthomonas campestris p.v. vesicatoria in tomato and pepper transplants. Phytopathology 77: 611-615.
HIRANO, S.S.; UPPER, C.D. 1983. Ecology and epidemiology of bacterial Plant pathogens. Ann. Rey. Phytopathol. 21:243-269.
IREY, MS.; STALL, R.E. 1981. Value of Xanthomonadins for identification of pigmented Xanthomonas campestris pathovars. Proc. Fifth Int. COnf. Plant Path. Bact. Cafi, Colombia
JONES, J.B.; POHRONEZNY, K.L.; S . TALL, R.E.; JONES, J.P. 1986. Survival of Xanthomonas campestris p.v. vesicatoria in Florida on tomato crop residue, weeds, seeds and volunteer tomato plants. Phytopathology 76:430-434.
KING,E.O.;WARD,M.K.;RANEY,D.E.1954. Two simple media for the demostration of Pyocyanin and fluorescein. Journal of laboratory and clinical medicirie 44:301-307.
LATORRE, B.A., JONES, A.L. 1978. SurvivaI and pathogenicity to sour cherry of Pseudomonas syringae recovered from weeds and plant refuses. Phytopathology news 12:137 (Resumen).
LAUB, C.A.; STALL, R.E. 1967. An evaluation of Solanum nigrum and Physalis minima as suscepts of Xanthomonas vesicatoria. Plant Dis. Reptr. 51: 659-661.
LEBEN, C. 1995. Epiphytic microorganisms in relation to plant disease. Ann. Rev. Phytopathol. 3: 209-230.
LIAO, C.H.; WELL, J.M. 1987. Association of Pectolytic strains of Xanthomonas campestris with soft rots of fruits and vegetables at retail markets. Phytopathology 77: 418-422.
MASS, J.L.; FINNEY, M.M.; CIVEROLO, E.L.; SASSER, M. 1985. Association of an unusual strain of Xanthomonas campestris with apple. Phytopathology 75: 438-455.
MCCARTER, S.M.; JONES, J.B.; GITAITIS, R.D.; SMITLEY, D.R. 1983. Survival of Pseudomonas syringae p.v. tomato in association with tomato seed, soil, host tissue and epiphytic weed host, in Georgia. Phytopathology 73: 1393-1398.
McCARTER-ZORNER, N.J.; HARRISON, M.D.; FRANC, G.D.; QUINN, C.E.; SELLS, I.A.; GRAHAM, D.C. 1985. Soft rot Erwinia bacteria in the rhizosphere of weeds and crop plants in Colorado, United States and Scotland. J. appl. Bacteriol. 59- 357-368.
MORRIS, C.E.; ROUSE, D.J. 1982. Diversity of epiphytic bacterial communities on bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) leaves and pods based on nutrient utilization. Phytopathology 72:936 (resumen). SCHAAD, N. (ed). 1980. Laboratory guide for identification of plant pathogenic bacteria. APS, St. Paul, Mn. 70 pp.
SCHUSTER, M.L. 1967. Survival of bean bacterial pathogensin the field and greenhouse under different environmental conditions. Phytopathology 57: 830 (resumen).
_________; COYNE, D.P. 1974. Survival mechanisms of Phytophatology bacteria. Ann. Rev. Phytopathol. 12: 199-221.
WELLER, D.M.; SAETTLER, A.W. 1980. Colonization and distribution of Xanthomonas phaseoli and Xanthomonas phaseoli var. fuscans. Phytopathology 70: 500-506.
__________. 1980. Evaluation of seedborne Xanthomonas phaseoli and Xanthomonas phaseoli var fuuscans as primary inocula in bean blights. Phytopathology 70: 148-152.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
1. Proposed policy for open access journals
Authors who publish in this journal accept the following conditions:
a. Authors retain the copyright and assign to the journal the right to the first publication, with the work registered under the attribution, non-commercial and no-derivative license from Creative Commons, which allows third parties to use what has been published as long as they mention the authorship of the work and upon first publication in this journal, the work may not be used for commercial purposes and the publications may not be used to remix, transform or create another work.
b. Authors may enter into additional independent contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (e.g., including it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book) provided that they clearly indicate that the work was first published in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to publish their work on the Internet (e.g. on institutional or personal pages) before and during the review and publication process, as it may lead to productive exchanges and faster and wider dissemination of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).