Characterization of the Zebu cattle population with a certificate of genealogical registration in Costa Rica
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15517/am.v31i3.39059Keywords:
Bos indicus, pedigree, sires, pure breedAbstract
Introduction. There is not much information on pure cattle with a genealogical certificate in Costa Rica. It is necessary to know the status of this population to direct efforts towards the productive improvement of the Zebu cattle breeds. Objective. To update the database of the Costa Rican Cebu Cattle Breeders Association (ASOCEBÚ), characterize this population and analyze the use of males of the gray Brahman breed in the country. Materials and methods. An inventory was done in 121 herds to update the Association’s database to 2018. The information was sorted by breed, sex, age, total animals, breeders, socio-economic region, province, and canton. The frequency of use of gray Brahman breeders was determined. Results. A total of 10 995 pure animals were counted, distributed in six breeds (gray Brahman, red Brahman, Nelore, Gyr, Guzerat, and Indubrasil). The gray Brahman breed predominated with 74.5 % of the population and 76.8 % of the total of breeders. The Chorotega region had the highest registered population (49.5 %) and the highest number of breeders (37.2 %). 55.8 % of the total population came from ten breeders, however, the largest number of herds corresponds to farms with few animals. In the gray Brahman breed, 60.8 % of the population comes from domestic bulls, and 39.2 % from other countries. Conclusion. Registered pure zebu cattle are distributed throughout the whole country. Attention should be put to genetic management to minimize inbreeding. Census and survey managers are encouraged to include the purebred populations in their assessments.
Downloads
References
ABBA (American Brahman Breeders Association). 2017. Most influential gray herd sires in the last five years. The Brahman Journal, TX, USA. https://brahmanjournal.com/cattle/most-influential-gray-herd-sires-in-the-last-five-years (accessed Sep.25, 2017).
ASOCEBÚ (Asociación de Criadores de Ganado Cebú de Costa Rica). 2017. Raza Brahman. ASOCEBÚ, CRI. http://asocebucr.com/razas/#raza-brahman (consultado 16 set. 2017).
ASOCEBÚ (Asociación de Criadores de Ganado Cebú de Costa Rica). 2020. Creación del registro genealógico. ASOCEBÚ, CRI. http://asocebucr.com/cebu-en-cr/#creaci%C3%B3n-del-registro-geneal%C3%B3gico (consultado 25 mar. 2020).
Campos, J.A. 2017. Uso de marcadores genéticos para análisis de diversidad genética y pruebas de verificación de identidad y paternidad en bovinos Brahman registrados en Costa Rica. Tesis MSc., Universidad Nacional, CRI.
Campos, J., B. Vargas, J. Camacho, y A. Cruz. 2018. Pruebas de identidad y paternidad en ganado Brahman registrado de Costa Rica. Agron. Costarricense 42(1):49-62. doi:10.15517/rac.v42i1.32197
Cervini, M., F. Henrique-Silva, N. Mortari, y E. Matheucci. 2006. Genetic variability of 10 microsatellite markers in the characterization of Brazilian Nellore cattle (Bosindicus). Genet. Mol. Biol. 29:486-490. doi:10.1590/S1415-47572006000300015
CORFOGA (Corporación de Fomento Ganadero). 2000. Análisis del censo ganadero 2000. Ministerio de Agricultura y Ganadería, CRI. http://www.mag.go.cr/biblioteca_virtual_animal/censo-ganadero-2000.pdf (consultado 16 set. 2017).
CORFOGA (Corporación de Fomento Ganadero). 2020. Programa nacional de evaluación y mejoramiento genético. San José, CRI. https://www.corfoga.org/mejoramiento-genetico/ (consultado 17 mar. 2020).
Gómez, Y.M., M. Fernández, D. Rivera, G. Gómez, and J.E. Bernal. 2013. Genetic characterization of Colombian Brahman cattle using microsatellites markers. Russ. J. Genet. 49:737-745. doi:10.1134/S1022795413070041
INEC (Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censo). 2015. VI Censo nacional agropecuario. INEC, San José, CRI.
Loftus, R.T., D.E. MacHugh, D.G. Bradley, P.M. Sharp, and P. Cunningham. 1994. Evidence for two independent domestications of cattle. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 91:2757-2761. doi:10.1073/pnas.91.7.2757
Madrigal, J., y M. Fallas. 2013. Informe encuesta ganadera 2012. CORFOGA, San José, CRI.
Martínez, M., B. Vargas, J.M. Cordero, I. Chacón, y B. León. 2015. Diversidad Genética entre subpoblaciones raciales bovinas de Costa Rica. Agron. Costarricense 39(2):33-45.
Novoa, M.A., y W. Usaquén. 2006. Diversidad genética de la población colombiana de ganado Cebú Brahman Americano Bos indicus (Bovidae). Acta Biol. Colomb. 11:112.
Quirós, E. 2006. Historia de la Ganadería Bovina en Costa Rica. CORFOGA, San José, CRI.
Presidente de la República, y MAG (Ministerio de Agricultura y Ganadería). 1989. Decreto Rjrcutivo No19400-MAG: Traspasa registro genealógico de ganado a Asociación de Productores y Criadores de Ganado Procuraduría General de la República, CRI. http://www.pgrweb.go.cr/scij/Busqueda/Normativa/Normas/nrm_texto_completo.aspx?param1=NRTC&nValor1=1&nValor2=4133&nValor3=4378&strTipM=TC (consultado 15 mar. 2020).
Rueda, J. 2015. Historia y líneas de sangre de la raza Brahman. Memoria del Seminario técnicas de selección y juzgamiento (San José, Costa Rica). ASOCEBÚ. San José, CRI.
Takeshima, S., C. Corbi-Botto, G. Giovambattista, and Y. Aida. 2018. Genetic diversity of BoLA-DRB3 in South American Zebu cattle populations. BMC Genetics 19:33. doi:10.1186/s12863-018-0618-7
Vélez, G. 2016. ¿Por qué utilizar ganado Cebú en el trópico? Tipo impreso Ltda., Bogotá, COL.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
1. Proposed policy for open access journals
Authors who publish in this journal accept the following conditions:
a. Authors retain the copyright and assign to the journal the right to the first publication, with the work registered under the attribution, non-commercial and no-derivative license from Creative Commons, which allows third parties to use what has been published as long as they mention the authorship of the work and upon first publication in this journal, the work may not be used for commercial purposes and the publications may not be used to remix, transform or create another work.
b. Authors may enter into additional independent contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (e.g., including it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book) provided that they clearly indicate that the work was first published in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to publish their work on the Internet (e.g. on institutional or personal pages) before and during the review and publication process, as it may lead to productive exchanges and faster and wider dissemination of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).