Influence of Computational Thinking Development on Metamemory Skills in Fifth-Grade Primary School Children
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15517/ap.v40i140.63072Keywords:
Computational thinking, metamemory, metacognition, school-age childrenAbstract
Objective. This study aimed to examin the relationship between computational thinking skills and metacognitive abilities in primary school children. Method. Seventy-three students aged from 9 to 10 years participated. They were divided and assigned either to a computational-thinking training group (n = 43) or to a traditional-instruction group (n = 30). Computational thinking and metamemory were assessed using standardized tests. Both mediation analyses and multivariate regression models were conducted. Results. The experimental group obtained significantly higher computational-thinking scores (M = 16.42) compared to the control group (M = 10.63). Furthermore, the first group committed fewer total metamemory errors (M = 4.67) in compariason to the second (M =
7.70). The correlation between computational thinking and metamemory was significant (r = -.579, p < .001), and the model accounted 52.3% of the variance. In addition, the gender of participants influenced the computational-thinking performance, whereas maternal education predicted metamemory outcomes. To conclude, the findings provide empirical evidence of the interaction between computational thinking and metacognitive processes in childhood.
Downloads
References
Arfé, B., Vardanega T., Montuori, C., & Lavanga, M. (2019). Coding in primary grades boosts children’s executive functions. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 2713. https://doi. org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02713
Cetin, I., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2014). Assessing the impact of meta-cognitive training on students’ understanding of introductory programming concepts. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 50(4), 507-524. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.50.4.d
Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). SAGE.
Flores-Lázaro, J. C., Otrosky-Shejet, F., & Lozano- Gutierrez, A. (2014). Batería de funciones frontales y ejecutivas: presentación. Revista Neuropsicología, Neuropsiquiatría y Neurociencia, 8(1), 141-158. http:// revistaneurociencias.com/index.php/RNNN/ article/view/233
Resolución 8430 de 1993. Por la cual se establecen las normas científicas, técnicas y administrativas para la investigación en salud. Octubre 4 de 1993. DO. N° 41131.
Markandan, N., Osman, K., & Halim, L. (2022). Integrating computational thinking and empowering metacognitive awareness in Stem education. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 872593. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fpsyg.2022.872593
Montuori, C., Gambarota, F., Altoé, G., & Arfé, B. (2024). The cognitive effects of computational thinking: A systematic review and meta-analytic study. Computers & Education, 210, Article 104961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. compedu.2023.104961
Murphy, L., Lewandowski, G., McCauley, R., Simon, B., Thomas, L., & Zander, C. (2008). Debugging: The good, the bad, and the quirky—A qualitative analysis of novices’ strategies. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 40(1), 163-167. https:// doi.org/10.1145/1352322.1352191
Nelson, T., & Narens, L. (1990). Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 26, 125-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079- 7421(08)60053-5
Ocak, C., Yadav, A., & Macann, V. (2023). Using Computational Thinking as a Metacognitive Tool in the Context of Plugged Vs. Unplugged Computational Activities. En J. D. Slotta & E. S. Charles (Eds.), Proceedings of the 17th International Conference of the Learning Sciences - ICLS 2023 (pp. 545-552). International Society of the Learning Sciences. https://doi.org/10.22318/icls2023.474441
Perfect, T. J., & Schwartz, B. L. (2002). Applied metacognition. Cambridge University Press.
Robledo-Castro, C., Castillo-Ossa, L. F., & Hederich-Martínez, C. (2023). Effects of a computational thinking intervention program on executive functions in children aged 10 to 11. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 35, Article 100563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2022.100563
Robledo-Castro, C., Rodríguez-Rodríguez, L. H., & Bonilla-Santos, G. (2025). El pensamiento computacional y su impacto sobre las habilidades metacognitivas de los niños de primaria. Revista EIA, 22(43), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.24050/reia.v22i43.1825
Román-González, M. (2015). Computational thinking test: Design guidelines and content validation. In Conference Proceedings of the 7th Annual International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies - EDULEARN15 (pp. 2436-2444). IATED Academy.
Román-González, M., Pérez-González, J. C., & Jiménez-Fernández, C. (2017). Which cognitive abilities underlie computational thinking? Criterion validity of the Computational Thinking Test. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 678-691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. chb.2016.08.047
Román-González, M., Pérez-González, J. C., Moreno-León, J., & Robles, G. (2018). Can computational talent be detected? Predictive validity of the Computational Thinking Test. International Journal of Child- Computer Interaction, 18, 47-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2018.06.004
Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Sánchez-Viveros, B. (2019). The cognitive benefits of learning computer programming: A meta-analysis of transfer effects. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(5), 764-792. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000314
Schwartz, B., & Metcalfe, J. (2017). Metamemory: An update of critical findings. In J. H. Byrne (Ed.), Learning and Memory: A Comprehensive Reference (2nd ed., pp. 423-432). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12- 809324-5.21056-0
Schwartz, B. L., & Díaz, F. (2014). Quantifying human metacognition for the neurosciences. In S. Fleming & C. Frith (Eds.), The Cognitive Neuroscience of Metacognition (pp. 9-23). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3- 642-45190-4_2
Schwartz, B. L., & Efklides, A. (2012). Metamemory and memory efficiency: Implications for student learning. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 1(3), 145-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2012.06.002
Shute, V. J., Sun, C., & Asbell-Clarke, J. (2017). Demystifying computational thinking. Educational Research Review, 22, 142-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.09.003
Tang, X., Yin, Y., Lin, Q., Hadad, R., & Zhai, X. (2020). Assessing computational thinking: A systematic review of empirical studies. Computers & Education, 148, Article 103798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. compedu.2019.103798
Volet, S. E., & Lund, C. P. (1994). Metacognitive instruction in introductory computer-programming: A better explanatory construct for performance than traditional factors. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 10(4), 297-328. https://doi/10.2190/9A08-Y2Q0-6AER-6KLQ
Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33-35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215
Yadav, A., Connolly, C., Berges, M., Chytas, C., Franklin, C., Hijón-Neira, R., Macann, V., Margulieux, L., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A., & Warner, J. R. (2022). A review of international models of computer science teacher education. In ITiCSE-WGR ‘22: Proceedings of the 2022 Working Group Reports on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (pp. 62-93). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3571785.3574123
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivativeWorks 4.0 Unported license
How to Cite
