“Mobbing” o acoso laboral: revisión de los principales aspectos teórico-metodológicos que dificultan su estudio

Authors

  • Jordi Escartín Solanelles Universidad de Barcelona, Facultad de Psicología Author
  • Carlos Arrieta Salas Universidad de Costa Rica, Escuela de Psicología Author
  • Álvaro Rodríguez Caballeira Universidad de Barcelona, Facultad de Psicología Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15517/ct2v2288

Keywords:

Mobbing, work harassment, psychological abuse, bullying in the workplace

Abstract

In the last years there has been a scientific and social growing interest in the study of the mobbing or psychological abuse in the workplace, being deepened in aspects such as their delimitation or prevention. The aim of this theoretical work is to carry out an exhaustive revision of the existent research in this field, showing the different approaches and theoretical models and aspects such as the mobbing components, its antecedents or the form in that this phenomenon has been historically measured. In the same way, this study also offers an approach about the theoretical-methodological difficulties in the study of the mobbing, standing out different problems as its cultural component, its subjectivity, the relevancy of considering to third, the high invisibility of its behaviours or the vague in its frequency. Thus, it is sought to contribute to an optimization of the efforts for the present and future investigation on the phenomenon.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adams, A. (1992). Bullying at work. How to confront and overcome it. Virago: London

Agra, V. B., Fernández, F. R. & Tascón, R. (2002). El acoso moral en el trabajo (mobbing): análisis sobre la limitada respuesta jurídica a un antiguo problema de reciente estudio y futura solución (legal). Revista de Trabajo y Seguridad Social, 233-234.

Aquino, K., Grover, S., Bradfield, M. & Allen, D.G. (1999). The effects of negative affectivity, hierachical status, and self-determination on workplace victimization. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 260-272.

Ashforth, B.E. (1994). Petty Tyranny in organizations. Human Relations, 47, 755-778.

Bjorkquist, K., Osterman, K. & Hjelt-Back, M. (1994). Aggression among university employees. Aggressive Behavior, 20, 173-184.

Brodsky, C. M. (1976). The Harassed Worker. Lexington. MA: D.C. Hearth.

Cortina, L. M., Magley, V. J., Williams, J. H. & Langhout, R. D. (2001). Incivility in the workplace: Incidence and impact. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 6(1), 64-80.

Coyne, I., Craig, J. & Smith-Lee, P. C. (2004). Workplace bullying in a group context. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 32, (3), 301-317.

Coyne, I., Seigne, E. & Randall, P. (2000). Predicting workplace victim status from personality. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 9 (3), 335-349.

Crawford, N. (1999). Conundrums and confusion in organizations. The etimology of the word “Bully”. International Journal of Manpower, 20, 86-93.

De Elena y Peña, J. (2005). Los problemas de denominación en el estudio del mobbing. Encuentros en Psicologia Social, 4, 699-705.

Einarsen, S. (2000). Harassment and bullying at work: A review of the Scandinavian approach. Aggression and Violent Behavior: A Review Journal, 4, 371-401.

Einarsen, S. (1999). The nature and causes of bullying at work. International Journal of Manpower, 20(1/2), 16-27.

Einarsen, S. (1996). Bullying and harassment at work: Epidemiological and psychosocial aspects. PhD thesis, University of Bergen: Department of Psychological Science.

Einarsen, S. & Raknes, B. I. (1997). Harassment at work and the victimization of men. Violence and Victims, 12, 247-263.

Einarsen, S. & Raknes, B. I. (1991). Bullying at work. Research Centre for Occupational Health and Safety: University of Bergen, Norway.

Einarsen, S. & Skogstad, A. (1996). Bullying at work: Epidemiological findings in public and private organizations. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5 (2), 185-201.

Einarsen, S., Hoel, H., Zapf, D. & Cooper, C. (2003). The Concept of Bullying at work. The European Tradition. En: S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf y C. Cooper (Eds.), Bullying and Emocional Abuse in the Workplace: Internacional Perspectives in research and practice. London / New York: Taylor & Francis

Einarsen, S., Raknes, B. I. & Mathiesen, S. M. (1994). Bullying and harassment at work and their relations to work environment quality. An exploratory study. The European Work and Organizacional Psychology, 4, 381-401.

Escartín, J., Rodríguez-Carballeira, A., Porrúa, C., & Martín-Peña, J. (2008). Estudio y análisis sobre cómo perciben el mobbing los trabajadores. Revista de Psicología Social, 23(2), 203-211.

Escartín, J., Rodríguez-Carballeira, A., Zapf, D., Porrúa, C., & Martín-Peña, J. (2009). Perceived severity of various bullying behaviours at work and the relevance of exposure to bullying. Work and Stress, 23(3), 191-205.

Escartín, J., Zapf, D., Arrieta, C., & Rodríguez-Carballeira, A. (en prensa). Workers perception of workplace bullying: A cross-cultural study. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology.

European Foundation for the improvement of Living and Working Conditions. (2001). Third European Survey on Working Conditions in the European Union (2000). (Publication Nº. 92-897-0130-7). Luxemburg: Office for the Official Publications of the European Communities.

Felson, R. B. (1992). Kick’em when they’re down’: Explanations of the relationships between stress and interpersonal aggression and violence. Sociological Quarterly, 33, (1), 1-16.

Fendrich, M., Woodward, P. & Richman, J.A. (2002). The structure of Harassment and abuse in the workplace: a factorial comparison of two measures. Violence and Victims, 17(4), 491-505.

Gandolfo, R. (1995). MMPI-2 profiles of worker’s compensations claimants who present with complaints of harassment. Journal of clinical psychology, 51, 711-715.

Glomb, T. M. (2002). Workplace aggression: informing conceptual models with data from specific encounters. Journal of occupational health psychology, 7, 20-36.

González De Rivera, J. L. & Rodríguez-Abuin, M. (2003). Cuestionario de estrategias de acoso psicológico: EL LIPT –60. Psiquiatria.com, 7 (5).

Hoel, H. & Cooper, C. L. (2000). Destructive conflict and bullying at work. Unpublished report, University of Manchester, Institute of Science and Technology.

Hoel, H. & Salin, D. (2003). Organizational antecedents of bullying. En: S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf, C. Cooper (Eds.), Bullying and Emotional Abuse in the Workplace: International Perspectives in Research and Practice, pp. 203-218. Taylor & Francis, London.

Hoel, H., Faragher, B. & Cooper, C.L. (2004). Bullying is detrimental to health, but all bullying behaviours are not necessarily equally damaging. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 32 (3), 367-387.

Hoel, H., Rayner, C. & Cooper, C. L. (1999). Workplace bullying. En C. L. Cooper y I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology, 14, 195-230. Chichester: Wiley.

Hubert, A. B. & Van Veldhoven, M. (2001). Risk sectors for undesired behavior and mobbing. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 10, 415-424.

Keashly, L. (1998). Emotional abuse in the workplace: conceptual and empirical issues. Journal of Emotional Abuse, 1, 85-117

Keashly, L., Trott, V. & MacLean, L.M. (1994). Abusive behavior in the workplace: a preliminary investigation. Violence and victims, 9, 341-357.

Landeta, J. (1999). El método Delphi: una técnica de previsión del futuro. Barcelona: Ariel

Lewis, S. E. (2006). Recognition of workplace bullying: a qualitative study of women targets in the public sector. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 7(2), 119-135.

Leymann, H. (1990). Mobbing and psychological terror at workplaces. Violence and Victims, 5, 119-126.

Leymann, H. (1996). The content and development of mobbing at work. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5, (2), 165-184.

Liefooghe, A. & Mackenzie, K. (2001). Accounts of workplace bullying. The role of the organization. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 10, (4), 375-392.

Liefooghe, A. P. & Olafsson, R. (1999). “Scientists” and “amateurs”: mapping the bullying domain. International Journal of Manpower, 20, (1/2), 39-49.

Meliá, J. L. (2006). The Best Psychosocial Correlates of Mobbing (bullying) at Work. En: P. Mondelo, M. Mattila, W. Karwowski, A. Hale (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Occupational Risk Prevention.

Mikkelsen, E. G., & Einarsen, S. (2002). Relationships between exposure to bullying at work and psychological and psychosomatic health complaints. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 43, 397-405.

Ministerio de trabajo y asuntos sociales. MTAS (2004). V Encuesta Nacional de Condiciones de Trabajo. (Publicación Nº ET.102). Madrid: Almodóvar, A. y otros técnicos del INSHT.

Molina, N. C. (2001). Una “nueva” patología de gestión en el empleo público: el acoso institucional (mobbing). Diario de Ley de 10-12-01.

Moscovici, S. & Hewstone, M. (1983). Social representations and explanations. En Hewstone, M., Attribution Theory: Social and Functional Extensions. Basil: Blackwell Publishers.

Mullen, E. (1997). Workplace violence: cause for concern or the construction of a new category of fear. Journal of Industrial Relations, 39, (1), 21-32.

Navarro, S. (2002). El acoso moral en el trabajo desde la Psicología del derecho del trabajo. Aranzadi Social, 4, 33.

Neuberger, O. (1999). Mobbing and wellbeing: economic and personal development implications. European Journal of Work and Organizacional Psychology, 5, 139-150.

Neuman, J.H. & Baron, R.A. (1998). Workplace violence and workplace aggression: Evidence concerning specific forms, potential causes, and preferred targets. Journal of Management, 24, 391-419.

Niedl, K. (1996). Mobbing and well-being: Economic and Personnnel Development Implications. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(2), 239-250.

Olweus, D. (1994). Bullying at school – basic facts and effects of a school based intervention program. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 35, 1171-1190.

Pearson, C. M. (2001). When workers flout convention: a study of workplace incivility. Human Relations, 54 (11), 1387- 1419.

Piñuel & Zabala, I. y Oñate, A. C. (2004). Los riesgos psicosociales en la administración: la incidencia del mobbing y el burnout en la AEAT y la IGAE. Madrid: Facultad de ciencias económicas y empresariales.

Quine, L. (1999). Workplace bullying in NHS community trust: Staff questionnaire survey. British Medical Journal, 3, 228-232.

Rayner, C. (1999). From Research to implementation: finding leverage for prevention. International Journal of Manpower, 20 (1/2), 28-38.

Rayner, C. (1997). The incidence of workplace bullying. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 7 (3), 199-208.

Rayner, C. & Hoel, H. (1997). A summary review of literature relating to Workplace Bullying. Applied Social Psychology, 7 (3), 181-191.

Rayner, C., Sheehan, M. & Barker, M. (1999). Theoretical approaches to the study of bullying at work. International Journal of Manpower, 20, (1/2), 11-15.

Rodríguez-Carballeira, A., Almendros, C., Escartín, J., Porrúa, C., Martín-Peña, J., Javaloy, F., & Carrobles, J.A. (2005). Un estudio comparativo de las estrategias de abuso psicológico: en pareja, en el lugar de trabajo y en grupos manipulativos. Anuario de Psicología, 36 (3), 299-314.

Rodríguez-Carballeira, A., Escartín, J., Visauta, B., Porrúa, C., & Martín-Peña, J. (2010). Categorization and hierarchy of workplace bullying strategies: A Delphi survey. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 13(1).

Salin, D. (2003). Ways of explaining workplace bullying: a review of enabling, motivating and precipitating structures and processes in the work environment. Human Relations, 56 (10), 1213-1232.

Teherani, N. (2003). Counselling and rehabilitating employees involved with bullying. En: S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf, y C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Bullying and emotional abuse in the workplace. International perspectives in research and practice (pp. 270-284). London & New York: Taylor & Francis.

Tersptra, D. E. & Baker, D. D. (1991). Sexual harassment at work: the psychosocial issues. En M. J. Davidson y J. Earnshaw (Eds.), Vulnerable workers: Psychosocial and legal issues (pp. 179-201). Chichester: Wiley.

Vartia, M. (1993). Psychological harassment (bullying, mobbing) at work. En: K. Kauppinnen Toropainen (Ed.), OECD panel group on women, work and health (pp.149–152). Helsinki: Ministry of Social Affairs and Health.

Zapf, D. & Gross, C. (2001). Conflict escalation and coping with workplace bullying: A replication and extension. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 10(4), 497-522.

Zapf, D. (1999). Organizational, work group related and personal causes of mobbing/bullying at work. International Journal of Manpower, 20(1/2), 70-85.

Zapf, D., Dormann, C. & Frese, M. (1996). Longitudinal studies in organizational stress research: a review of the literature with reference to methodological issues. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 1 (2), 145-169.

Zapf, D., Einarsen, S., Hoel, H. & Vartia, M. (2003). Empirical findings on bullying in the workplace. En S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf y C. L. Cooper, (Eds), Bullying and emotional abuse in the workplace. International perspectives in research and practice. (pp. 103-126). London & New York: Taylor & Francis.

Zapf, D., Escartín, J., Einarsen, S., Hoel, H., & Vartia, M. (2010). Empirical findings on the prevalence rate and risk groups of bullying in the workplace. En S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf, & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Workplace bullying: Development in theory, research and practice. London & New York: Taylor & Francis.

Zapf, D., Knorf, C. & Kulla, M. (1996). On the relationships between mobbing factors, and job content, social work environment, and health outcomes. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(2), 215-237.

Downloads

Published

2011-01-27

How to Cite

Escartín Solanelles, J., Arrieta Salas, C., & Rodríguez Caballeira, Álvaro. (2011). “Mobbing” o acoso laboral: revisión de los principales aspectos teórico-metodológicos que dificultan su estudio. Actualidades En Psicología, 23(110), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.15517/ct2v2288