Metáforas y significados no literales: tendencias recientes en la investigación neuropsicológica

Molina-Delgado, Mauricio

doi:10.15517/ap.v22i109.17

Authors

Mauricio Molina-Delgado Universidad de Costa Rica, Instituto de Investigaciones Psicológicas Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15517/ap.v22i109.17

Keywords:

Metaphor, polysemy, cognition, neuropsychology

Abstract

The author makes a survey of the recent research in metaphors and non-literal meaning from a neuropsychological perspective. Procedure. A theoretical evaluation is made, different tendencies are identified and possible lines of research for the future are considered. Conclusion. Typically, related phenomena are confused with metaphors. There is a total divorce between neuropsychological and cognitive approaches.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anaki, D., Faust, M., Kravetz, S. (1998). Cerebral hemispheric asymmetries in processing lexical metaphors. Neuropsychologia, 36, 353-362. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(97)00110-3

Andrewes, D. (2001). Neuropscychology. From theory to practice. London: Psychology Press.

Aristóteles. (1976). El arte poética. Madrid, Espańa: Espasa-Calpe.

Aristóteles. (2004). Ρητορική [La retórica]. Atenas, Grecia: Zitros.

Barthes, R. (1974). La antigua retórica. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Tiempo contemporáneo.

Billow, R.M. (1977). Metaphor: A review of psychological literature. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 81-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.84.1.81

Black, M. (1980). More about metaphor. En A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought. (pp. 19-43). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173865.004

Black, M. (1981). Metaphor. En M. Johnson (Ed.), Philosophical perspectives on metaphor. (pp. 63-82). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

Breton, A. (1980). Manifiestos surrealistas. Barcelona: Guadarrama.

Brownell, H., Simpson,T., Bihrle,A., Potter, & H., Gardner, H. (1990). Appreciation of metaphorical alternative word meanings by left and right brain-damages patients. Neuropsychologia, 28, 375-383. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(90)90063-T

Coulson, S. & van Petten, C. (2002). Conceptual integration and metaphor: An event-related potential study. Memory & Cognition, 30, 958-968. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195780

Faust, M. y Chiarello, C. (1998). Hemispheric ambiguity resolution. Neuropsychologia, 36, 827-835. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(98)00042-6

Freud, S. (1981a). La interpretación de los sueńos. En Luis López-Ballesteros (Ed.), Freud: Obras completas. (pp. 344-721). Madrid: Alianza.

Freud, S. (1981b). Tres ensayos para una teoría sexual. En Luis López-Ballesteros (Ed.), Freud: Obras completas. (pp. 1169-1237). Madrid: Alianza.

Frijda, N.H. (1986). Emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gardner, H. (1982). Arte, mente y cerebro: una aproximación cognitiva a la creatividad. Barcelona: Paidós.

Gibbs, R.W. (2002). The poetics of mind. Figurative thought, language and understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gibbs, R. (1992). Categorization and metaphor understanding. Psychological Review, 99, 572-577. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.99.3.572

Gibbs, R. (1996). Why many concepts are metaphorical. Cognition, 61, 309-319. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(96)00723-8

Giora, R., and Fein, O. (1999) On understanding familiar and less familiar figurative language. Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 1601-1618. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00006-5

Gluksberg, S. & Keysar, B. (1990). Understanding metaphorical comparisons: Beyond similarity. Psychological Review, 97, 3-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.97.1.3

Glucksberg, S. (2001) Understanding figurative language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195111095.001.0001

Jackobson, R. (1995). Two aspects of language and two types of aphasic disturbances. En L. Waugh & M. Monville-Burston (Eds.), On language . (pp. 115-133). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Johnson, M. (1995). Why metaphors matters to philosophy. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 10, 157-162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms1003_1

Kandel, E.R., Schwartz, J.H., y Jessell, T.M. (1997). Neurociencia y conducta. Madrid: Prentice Hall.

Klepousniotou, E. (2003). Η συμβολή του αριστερού και δεξιού ημισφαιρίου του ενκεφαλού στην κατανόηση των λέξεων πολλαπλές. [El rol de los hemisferios izquierdo y derecho en la comprensión de palabras polisémicas]. Conferencia dictada en la Universidad Aristóteles de Salónica.

Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001

Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, Chicago University Press.

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in flesh. The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.

Lakoff, G. & Turner, M. (1989). More than cool reason. A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226470986.001.0001

Martindale, C. (1999). Biological bases of creativity. En R.J. Stermberg, Handbook of creativity. (pp. 137-152). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807916.009

Murphy, G. (1996). On metaphoric representation. Cognition, 60, 173-204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(96)00711-1

Murphy, G. (1997). Reasons to doubt the present evidence for metaphoric representation. Cognition, 62, 99-108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(96)00725-1

Ortony, A., Schallert, D.L. & Reynolds, R.E. (1978). Interpreting metaphors and idioms: Some effects of context on comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 465-477. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(78)90283-9

Richards, I.A. (1965). The philosophy of rhetoric. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ricoeur, P. (1993). The rule of metaphor. Multidisciplinary studies of the creation of meaning in language. Toronto, Canada: Toronto University Press.

Rosch, E. (1973). Natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 328-350. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(73)90017-0

Sadock, J.M. (1980). Figurative speech and linguistics. En A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought. (pp. 46-63). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

Searle, J. (1980). Metaphor. En A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 92-123). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Shields, J. (1991). Semantic-pragmatic disorder: A right hemisphere syndrome? British Journal of Disorders of Communication, 26, 383-392. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/13682829109012023

Tourangeau, R. & Sternberg, R. (1981). Aptness in metaphor. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 27-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(81)90003-7

Tourangeau, R., & Sternberg, R. (1982). Understanding and appreciating metaphors. Cognition, 11, 203-244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(82)90016-6

Turner, M. y Fauconnier, G. (1995). Conceptual integration and formal expression. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 10, 183-204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms1003_3

Turner, M. y Fauconnier, G. (2002). Metaphor, metonimy, and binding. En R. Dirven y R. Porings (Eds.). Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and context. (pp. 469-488). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219197.4.469

Wisniewsky, E. (1996). Construal and similarity in conceptual combination. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 434-453. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1996.0024

Zaidel, D.W. (1988). Hemispheric asymmetries in memory for incongruous scenes. Cortex, 24, 231-244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(88)80032-7

Zaidel, D.W. & Kasher, A. (1989). Hemispheric memory for surrealistic versus realistic paintings. Cortex, 25, 617-641. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(89)80023-1