Amigos y amantes: los valores relativos de trueque de diferentes tipos de compañeros en el intercambio social

Figueredo, Aurelio José; Kirsner, Beth R.; Tal , Ilanit

doi:10.15517/ap.v18i105.46

Autores/as

Aurelio José Figueredo University of Arizona, Programa de postgrado en Etología y Psicología Evolutiva Autor/a
Beth R. Kirsner Kennesaw State University, Department of Psychology Autor/a
Ilanit Tal University of New Mexico, Department of Psychology Autor/a

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15517/ap.v18i105.46

Resumen

Se utilizó el Inventario de Valor como Pareja (IVP) en talleres paralelos titulados “La Racionalidad del romance” con muestras independientes recolectadas en cuatro sitios distintos: (1) Tucson, Arizona, Estados Unidos (n = 71), (2) Hermosillo, Sonora, México (n = 56), (3). Ciudad de México, Distrito Federal, México (n = 39), y (4) San José, Costa Rica (n = 77). Cada participante contestó un cuestionario anónimo y confidencial que incluía preguntas sobre su percepción de su propio “Valor como pareja” (VP), el VP de sus parejas románticas presentes o pasadas, y el VP de sus mejores amistades masculinas y femeninas. Cada participante dio informes sobre relaciones con sus parejas presentes o pasadas, incluyendo su grado de fidelidad a esa pareja, la seriedad de esa relación, y su satisfacción con esa relación. Se especificaron y analizaron varias relaciones entre los datos obtenidos por medio de un modelo económico de intercambio social.

Descargas

Los datos de descarga aún no están disponibles.

Referencias

Alcock, J. (2001). The triumph of sociobiology. Oxford, NY: Oxford University. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195143836.001.0001

Bleske, A.L.; Buss, D.M. (2000). Can men and women be just friends?. Pers. Relation-ship., 7: 131-151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2000.tb00008.x

Buss, D.M. y Schmitt, D.P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychol. Rev., 100: 204-232. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.100.2.204

Burley, N.T. (1988). The differential allocation hypothesis: an experimental test. Am. Nat. 132: 611-628. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/284877

Cosmides, L. y Tooby, J. (1992). Cognitive adaptations for social exchange. En: J.H. Bar-kow; L. Cosmides y J. Tooby (Eds.) The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 163-228). New York, NY: Oxford University. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195060232.003.0004

Darwin, C. (1859). On the origin of species. London, UK: Murray.

Ellis, B. (1998). The partner-specific investment inventory: An evolutionary approach to individual differences in investment. J. Pers., 66: 383-442. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.00017

Figueredo, A.J.; McKnight, P.E.; McKnight, K.M. y Sidani, S. (2000). Multivariate model-ing of missing data within and across assessment waves. Addiction, 95 (Supple-ment 3): S361-S380. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1360-0443.95.11s3.6.x

Gangestad, S.W. y Simpson, J.A. (2000). The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism. Behav. Brain Sci., 23: 573-644. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0000337X

Gangestad, S.W. y Simpson, J.A. (1990). Toward an evolutionary history of female soci-osexual variation. J. Pers., 58: 69-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1990.tb00908.x

Ghiselin, M.T. (1974). The economy of nature and the evolution of sex. Berkeley, CA: University of California.

Gorsuch, R.L. (1983). Factor analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Gould, S.J. (2002). The structure of evolutionary theory. Cambridge, MA: Belknap. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674417922

Hobbes, T. (1651/1973). Leviathan. Introduction by Kenneth Minogue. London, UK: J.M. Dent y Sons.

Hume, D. (1739/1978). A treatise of human nature. New York, NY: Oxford University. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oseo/instance.00046221

Johnston, V.S. y Franklin, M. (1993). Is beauty in the eyes of the beholder? Ethol. Socio-biol., 14: 183-199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(93)90005-3

Kenrick, D.T.; Groth, G.E.; Trost, M.R. y Sadalla, E.K. (1993). Integrating evolutionary and social exchange perspectives on relationships: Effects of gender, self-appraisal, and involvement level on mate selection criteria. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 64: 951-969. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.64.6.951

Kenrick, D.T. y Trost, M.R. (2000). A reproductive exchange model of heterosexual rela-tionships: Putting proximate economics in ultimate perspective. En: Hendrick, C. (Ed.), Close relationships (pp. 92-118). Newbury Park: Sage..

Kirsner, B.R.; Figueredo, A.J. y Jacobs, W.J. (2002). Self, friends, and lovers: Structural relations among Beck Depression Inventory scores and perceived mate values. Journal of Affective Disorders, in press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0327(02)00048-4

Krebs, J.R. y Davies, N.B. (1996). Behavioural ecology: An evolutionary approach. Fourth Edition. Oxford: Blackwell.

Malthus, T.R. (1798/1926). An essay on the principle of population as it affects the future improvement of society, with remarks on the speculations of Mr Godwin, M. Con-dorcet and other writers. Facsimile edition. London, UK: Macmillan.

Maynard Smith, J. (1982). Evolution and the theory of games. Cambridge: Cambridge University. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511806292

Merikangas, K.R. (1982). Assortative mating for psychiatric disorders and psychological traits. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry, 39: 1173-1180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1982.04290100043007

Miller, G.F. (2000). The mating mind: How sexual choice shaped the evolution of human nature. New York, NY: Doubleday.

Pérusse, D. (1993). Cultural and reproductive success in industrial societies: Testing the relationship at the proximate and ultimate levels. Behav. Brain Sci., 16: 267-322. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00029939

Ridley, M. (1996). The origins of virtue. New York, NY: Penguin.

Rowe, D.C.; Vazsonyi, A.T. y Figueredo, A.J. (1997). Mating effort in adolescence: Condi-tional or alternative strategy?. Journal of Personality and Individual Differences, 23: 105-115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(97)00005-6

Ruse, M. (1989). The darwinian paradigm. London, UK: Routledge.

SAS Institute, Inc. (1999). SAS language and procedures, version 8. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.

Shea, W.R. (1980). Nature mathematized. Boston, MA: D. Reidel.

Singh, D. (1995). Female health, attractiveness, and desirability for relationships: Role of breast asymmetry and waist-to-hip ratio. Ethol. Sociobiol., 16: 465-481. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(95)00073-9

Smith, A. (1776). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. London, UK: W. Strahan y T. Cadell. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oseo/instance.00043218

Thibaut, J. y Kelley, H.H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York, NY: Wiley and Sons.