Journal of Philology and Linguistics of the University of Costa Rica ISSN Impreso: 0377-628X ISSN electrónico: 2215-2628

OAI: https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/filyling/oai
Metacognitive Strategies of Reading Comprehension in the Spanish as a Second or Foreign Language Classroom
PDF (Español (España))

Keywords

metacognición
estrategias
comprensión de lectura
segundas lenguas
lenguas extranjeras.
metacognition
strategies
reading comprehension
second languages
foreign languages.

How to Cite

López Jurado, A. L. (2016). Metacognitive Strategies of Reading Comprehension in the Spanish as a Second or Foreign Language Classroom. Journal of Philology and Linguistics of the University of Costa Rica, 41(1), 113–125. https://doi.org/10.15517/rfl.v41i1.23743

Abstract

In this paper, metacognitive strategies are not only explained but it is shown how those strategies can be implemented in a Spanish as a Second Language (L2) (or Foreing Language, ELE) classroom too. Three main metacgonitive components are taken into account: declarative, procedimental and conditional knowledges that can be applied in the classroom as metacognitive processes: planification, monitoring and control, and evaluation. Such strategies promote the learners’s autonomy by allowing students to monitor, control and evaluate their own learning process (Hall, 1991; Pintrich, 2002; Jiménez Rodríguez, 2004; Muhammand Al-Khateeb, 2011; Alhaqbani & Riazi, 2012). Furthermore, when those strategies have been applied in foreign language classroom students has obtained better results at reading comprehension tasks (Brantmeir, 2003; Yang, 2002; Farrell, 2001).

https://doi.org/10.15517/rfl.v41i1.23743
PDF (Español (España))

References

Alhaqbani, A. & Riazi, M. (2012). Metacognitive awareness of reading strategies use in Arabic as a second language. Reading as a Foreign Language. 24 (2), 231-255.

Antonijevic, N. y Chadwick, C. (1981/82). Estrategias cognitivas y metacognición. Revista de Tecnología Educativa. 7, 4, 307-321.

Brantmeier, C. (2003). Does gender make a difference? Passage content and comprehension in second language reading. Reading in a Foreign Language. 15 (1), 1-27.

Carrell, P., Carson, J.G. & Zhe, D. (1993). First and Second Language Strategies: Evidence from Cloze. Reading in a Foreign Language. 10 (1), 953-965.

Cuetos-Vega, F. (2000). Psicología de la lectura: diagnóstico y tratamiento de los transtornos de lectura. Barcelona: CISSPRAXIS.

Dunlosky, J. y Metcalfe, J. (2009). Metacognition. Estados Unidos de América: Sage Publications, Inc.

El-Hindi, A. (1997). Connecting Reading and Writing: College Learners Meta Cognitive Awareness. Journal of Developmental Education. 21 (2), 10-17.

Farrell, T. S. C. (2001). Teaching Reading Strategies: ‘It Takes Time!’. Reading in a Foreign Language. 13 (2), 631-646.

Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and Cognitive Memory: a New Area of Cognitive-Developmental Inquiry. American Psycologist. 34 (10), 906-911.

Graesser, A. C., Olde, B., Pomeroy, V., Whitten, S., Lu, S. & Craig, S. (2006). Inferencias y preguntas en la comprensión de textos científicos. Tarbiya: Revista de Investigación e Innovación Educativa del Instituto Universitario de Ciencias de la Educación. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid. 36, 103-128.

Hall, W. S. (1991). La comprensión de la lectura. Por A. Puente (Ed.). Compresión de la lectura y acción docente. (25-72). España: Ediciones Pirámide.

Jiménez-Rodríguez, V. (2004). Metacognición y comprensión de la lectura: evaluación de los componentes estratégicos (procesos y variables) mediante la elaboración de una escala de conciencia lectora (ESCOLA) (Tesis doctoral). Universidad Complutense de Madrid.

Muhammand Al-Khateeb, O. S. (2011). The Impact of Using Meta Cognitive Learning Strategies on Al-Hussain Bin Talal University Students’ Achievement in and Attitudes towards Health Concepts in “Tenet of Worship” Course. Asian Social Science. 7 (3), 165-186.

Navarro, A. (1991). Procesos perceptivos y atencionales durante la lectura. Por A. Puente (Ed.). Compresión de la lectura y acción docente. (41-72). España: Ediciones Pirámide.

Pintrich, P. R. (2002). The Role of Metacognitive Knowledge in Learning, Teaching, and Assessing. Theory Into Practice. 41 (4), 219-225.

Puente, A. (1991). Comprensión de lectura y acción docente. Madrid: Pirámide.

Rossi, J-P. (1991). Input and Output: Processing and representation. Por G. Denhière & J-P. Rossi. (Eds.). Advances in Psychology 79: Text and Text Processing. (3-18). Holanda: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.

Rumelhart, D. E. (2013). Toward an Interactive Model of Reading. Por D. E. Alvermann, N. J. Unrau & R. B. Ruddell (Eds.). Theoretical models and processes of reading. (719-747). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

Sainz, J. S. (1991). Procesos de lectura y comprensión de lenguaje. Por J. Mayor & J. L. Pinillos (Eds.). Tratado de Psicología General. (641-738). Madrid: Alhambra Longman http://es.scribd.com/doc/5199431/PROCESOS-DE-LA-LECTURA.

Wade, S. E. & Reynolds, R. E. (1989). Developing metacogntive awareness. Journal of Reading. 33 (1), 6-14.

Yamashita, J. (2004). Reading attitudes in L1 and L2, and their influence on L2 extensive reading. Reading in a Foreign Language. 16 (1), 1-19.

Yang, Y-F. (2002). Reassessing Readers’ Comprehension Monitoring. Reading in a Foreign Language. 14 (1), 18-42.

Comments

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.