Journal of Philology and Linguistics of the University of Costa Rica ISSN Impreso: 0377-628X ISSN electrónico: 2215-2628

OAI: https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/filyling/oai
A Cognitive-Axiological Analysis of Gymshark’s Adverts
PDF
EPUB
HTML (Español (España))

Supplementary Files

Audio de resumen (Español (España))

Keywords

Gymshark
advertising discourse
cognitive-axiological analysis
persuasive techniques
axiological values
Gymshark
discurso publicitario
análisis cognitivo-axiológico
técnicas persuasivas
valores axiológicos

How to Cite

García Carreño, A. (2021). A Cognitive-Axiological Analysis of Gymshark’s Adverts. Journal of Philology and Linguistics of the University of Costa Rica, 48(1), e48358. https://doi.org/10.15517/rfl.v48i1.48358

Abstract

Gymshark is a British fitness clothing company that, in less than 10 years, has become a multi-million dollar company. This company’s success is linked to its promotion through an advertising discourse which emphasizes an ethical system that significantly differentiates it from other active-wear companies on the market. To do this, Gymshark relies on a digital advertising discourse, presented through social networks such as Instagram or YouTube to reach a young audience more immediately. Thus, this paper aims to analyze the persuasive techniques used in eight Gymshark ads to promote clothing collections and fitness challenges, especially the use of cognitive and axiological tools: conceptual metaphors and metonymies, image schemas and colour. Consequently, this analysis relies on Cognitive Linguistics theory (Lakoff & Johnson, 1980; Ruiz de Mendoza, 2002; Evans & Green, 2006), its application to advertising discourse (Forceville, 1996; 2008; 2009), the axiological notions proposed by Krzeszowski (1990) and some considerations on the use of colour. The results show that Gymshark’s advertising discourse prioritizes the use of cognitive tools to associate the products and the brand with positive axiological values beyond those strictly linked to fitness; therefore, this constitutes a key factor in the development of the consumer’s attraction to the brand.

https://doi.org/10.15517/rfl.v48i1.48358
PDF
EPUB
HTML (Español (España))

References

Barthes, R. (1964). Éléments de sémiologie. Communications, 4(1), 91-135.

Cook, J. (2020). How Gymshark Became A $1.3 Billion Brand, And What We Can Learn. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/jodiecook/2020/08/17/how-gymshark-became-a-13bn-brand-and-what-we-can-learn/?sh=26573b2376ed

Cortés de los Ríos, M. E. (2002). Cognitive semantics and axiology: a new proposal to study metaphor in economics advertising discourse. Revista alicantina de estudios ingleses, 15, 39-47.

Cortés de los Ríos, M. E. (2008). Estudio cognitivo del componente visual de mensajes publicitarios anunciados en la campaña de navidad. In R. Monroy & A. Sánchez (Eds.), 25 años de lingüística en España (pp. 507-514). [Digital version]. Retrieved from https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=4653096.

Cortés de los Ríos, M. E. (2010). Cognitive devices to communicate the economic crisis: An analysis through covers in The Economist. Ibérica: Revista de la Asociación Europea de Lenguas para Fines Específicos (AELFE), (20), 81-106.

Cortés de los Ríos, M. E. & Azzahara, F. (2014). The construction of conceptual meaning in print footwear advertisements. LSP, Professional Communication, Knowledge Management and Cognition, 5(2), 4-23.

Evans, V. & Green, M. (2006). Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Felices Lago, Á. & Cortés de los Ríos, M. E. (2009). A cognitive-axiological approach to print eco-advertisements in The Economist: the energy sector under scrutiny. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas, 4, 59-78.

Forceville, Ch. (1996). Pictorial Metaphor in Advertising. London and New York: Routledge.

Forceville, Ch. (2008). Metaphor in Pictures and Multimodal Representations. In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought (pp. 462-483). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Forceville, Ch. (2009). Non-verbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitivist framework: Agendas for research. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal Metaphor (pp. 19-45). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Goossens, L. (1990). Metaphtonymy: the interaction of metaphor and metonymy in expressions for linguistic action. Cognitive Linguistics, 1(3), 323-340.

Gymshark [@gymshark]. (2021). Be a visionary [Biography]. Instagram. Retrieved from https://www.instagram.com/gymshark/?hl=es

Gymshark Company. [Gymshark]. (September 13, 2019). RYAN GARCIA: THE FASTEST HANDS IN BOXING |Gymshark Motivation [Video]. YouTube. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1_b6YHfQssA&t=9s

Gymshark Women [@gymsharkwomen]. (2021). Hidden gems…#gymsharkwomen [Comment section]. Instagram. Retrieved from https://www.instagram.com/p/COTJvZmB4Qo/

Juhlin, L. & Soini, M. (2018). How do influencer marketers affect brand associations?: a semiotic Instagram study in the sports fashion industry. (Master Thesis). Kristianstad University. Retrieved from http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A1223967&dswid=6105

Kress, G. & Van Leeuwen, T. V. (2001). Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Bloomsbury Academic.

Krzeszowski, T. (1990). The axiological aspect of idealized cognitive models. In J. Tomaszczyk & B. Lewandowska (Eds.), Meaning and Lexicography (pp. 135-165). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Peña Cervel, S. (1999). Subsidiarity relationships between image-schemas: an approach to the force schema. Journal of English Studies, 1, 187-208.

Pérez Sobrino, P. (2017) Multimodal Metaphor and Metonymy in Advertising. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Petrovici, I. (2014). Aspects of Symbolic Communications in Online Advertising. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 149, 719-723.

Pike, S. (2019). 3 Ways Gymshark Is Smashing It On Instagram. Retrieved from https://minter.io/blog/3-ways-gymshark-is-smashing-it-on-instagram/

Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J. (2002). From semantic underdetermination via metaphor and metonymy to conceptual interaction. Theoria et Historia Scientiarum, 6(1), 107-141.

Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J. & Galera Masegosa, A. (2011). Going beyond metaphtonymy: Metaphoric and metonymic complexes in phrasal verb interpretation. Language Value, 3, 1-29.

Telišman, P. (2020). Utjecaj Instagrama na promociju brenda Gymshark. (Undergraduate thesis). Vern’ University of Zagreb. Retrieved from https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:146:863074

Vatral, M. (2018). The Current Role Of Color Psychology In The Practice Of Gender Marketing. (Doctoral thesis). University of North Georgia. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.northgeorgia.edu/honors_theses/38/.

Velasco, M. S. & Cortés de los Ríos, M. E. (2009). Persuasive nature of image schematic devices in advertising: their use for introducing sexisms. Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses, 22, 239-270.

Comments

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.