Keywords
Engineering
research results
engineering lectures
research disclosure
research evaluation
ingeniería
resultados de investigación
ponencias de ingeniería
divulgación de la investigación
evaluación de la investigación
How to Cite
Abstract
Report of conferences of the IV Research Conference of the Faculty of Engineering of the year 2022.
References
C. Bartneck and M. Okada, “Robotic user interfaces,” Proceedings of the Human and Computer Conference (HC 2001), pp. 130–140, 2001.
E. Torta, J. Oberzaucher, F. Werner, R. H. Cuijpers, and J. F. Juola, “Attitudes Towards Socially Assis-tive Robots in Intelligent Homes: Results From Laboratory Studies and Field Trials,” J Hum Robot Interact, vol. 1, no. 2, Jan. 2013, doi: 10.5898/JHRI.1.2.Torta.
J. Li, “The benefit of being physically present: A survey of experimental works comparing copresent robots, telepresent robots and virtual agents,” Int J Hum Comput Stud, vol. 77, pp. 23–37, May 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2015.01.001.
K. Dautenhahn, “Socially intelligent robots: dimensions of human–robot interaction,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, vol. 362, no. 1480, pp. 679–704, Apr. 2007, doi: 10.1098/rstb.2006.2004.
International Organization for Standardization, “ISO 13407:1999 Human-centred design processes for interactive systems,” Jun. 1999. Accessed: Jun. 28, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.iso. org/standard/21197.html
D. M. Wilkes et al., “Toward socially intelligent service robots,” Applied Artificial Intelligence, vol. 12, no. 7–8, pp. 729–766, Oct. 1998, doi: 10.1080/088395198117604.
A. Vega, K. Ramírez-Benavidez, and L. A. Guerrero, “Tool UTAUT Applied to Measure Interaction Experience with NAO Robot,” in Human-Computer Interaction. Design Practice in Contemporary Societies. HCII 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 11568, M. Kurosu, Ed. Springer, Cham, 2019, pp. 501–512. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030- 22636-7_38.
A. Vega, K. Ramírez-Benavides, L. A. Guerrero, and G. López, “Evaluating the Nao Robot in the Role of Personal Assistant: The Effect of Gender in Robot Performance Evaluation,” in 13th Inter-national Conference on Ubiquitous Computing and Ambient Intelligence UCAmI 2019, Nov. 2019,
p. 20. doi: 10.3390/proceedings2019031020.
J. Hernandez-Cedeño, K. Ramírez-Benavides, L. Guerrero, and A. Vega, “NAO as a Copresenter in a Robotics Workshop - Participant’s Feedback on the Engagement Level Achieved with a Robot in the Classroom,” in Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 784, Springer, Cham, 2019, pp. 143–152. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-94346- 6_14.
R. Madrigal Acuña, A. Vega, and K. Ramírez-Benavides, “Qbo robot as an educational assistant - Parti-cipants feedback on the engagement level achieved with a robot in the classroom,” in Advances in Intel-ligent Systems and Computing, Jul. 2019, vol. 784, pp. 163–171. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-94346-6_16.
S. Romero-Pérez, K. Smith-Arias, L. Corrales-Cortés, K. Ramírez-Benavides, A. Vega, and A. Mora, “Evaluating Virtual and Local Pepper Presence in the Role of Communicator Interacting with Another Human Presenter at a Vocational Fair of Computer Sciences,” 2022, pp. 580–589. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-05409-9_42.
SoftBank Robotics, “Pepper the humanoid and programmable robot,” SoftBank Robotics, 2022. https://www.softbankrobotics.com/emea/en/pepper (accessed Jun. 28, 2022).
Usability.gov Staff Writer, “With Measurable Usability Goals – We All Score,” Usability.gov Staff Writer, 2013. http://www.usability.gov/get- involved/blog/2013/09/measurable-usability-goals.html (accessed Jun. 13, 2014).
Usability Engineering. Elsevier, 1993. doi: 10.1016/C2009-0-21512-1.
M. Heerink, B. Kröse, V. Evers, and B. Wielinga, “Measuring acceptance of an assistive social robot: A suggested toolkit,” Proceedings - IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, no. June 2014, pp. 528–533, 2009, doi: 10.1109/ROMAN.2009.5326320.
C. Bartneck, D. Kulić, E. Croft, and S. Zoghbi, “Measurement Instruments for the Anthropomorphism, Animacy, Likeability, Perceived Intelligence, and Perceived Safety of Robots,” Int J Soc Robot, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 71–81, Jan. 2009, doi: 10.1007/s12369-008- 0001-3.
Comments
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2023 Orlando Arrieta Orozco, Víctor Schmidt Díaz, Karina Castro Arce