Ingeniería ISSN Impreso: 1409-2441 ISSN electrónico: 2215-2652

OAI: https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/ingenieria/oai
The Behaviour Of Two Beam-Column Joints With Two Reinforcement Details For Use In Housing
PDF (Español (España))
HTML (Español (España))
EPUB (Español (España))

Keywords

Beam
column
ductility
housting
joints
seismic
columna
ductilidad
sismoresistencia
uniones
viga
vivienda

How to Cite

Solís, A., & Navas Carro, A. (2023). The Behaviour Of Two Beam-Column Joints With Two Reinforcement Details For Use In Housing. Ingeniería, 34(1), 33–42. https://doi.org/10.15517/ri.v34i1.55503

Abstract

In housing, concrete masonry is one of the most used construction systems in Costa Rica. Under this construction system, beams and columns of equal width (12 or 15 cm) are usually required. In these cases, constructively, bending the reinforcing steel of the beam or column is used. This type of bend used
“strangles” the reinforcement right in the section of maximum moment. Thus, it is relevant to experimentally investigate the behavior of these joints that are typically observed in constructions.
The behavior of joints with two different reinforcement details and with 12 cm thick elements for use in housing was analyzed. Four joints were built, two with a “bottleneck” reinforcement detail
(Type A Joint) and two with a 1:6 slope detail (Type B Joint). These were failed in the LanammeUCR Structures Laboratory under the application of a pseudo dynamic cyclic load. Rotations were calculated and the hysteresis curve and elastoplastic curve were constructed for each joint. The behavior of the two
types of joints was compared, as well as the experimental capacity results with respect to the expected theoretical capacity.
The results obtained show that Type A Joints do not reach the calculated theoretical capacity and present a less ductile behavior than Type B Joints. It was concluded that it is preferable and advisable to use beam-column joints with the slope detail 1:6 as part of the earthquake-resistant system of a home.

https://doi.org/10.15517/ri.v34i1.55503
PDF (Español (España))
HTML (Español (España))
EPUB (Español (España))

References

CFIA, Código Sísmico de Costa Rica 2010 Revisión 2014. Cartago, Costa Rica: Editorial Tecnológica de Costa Rica, 2014.

ACI, Requisitos de Reglamento para Concreto Estructural (ACI 318S-14). Michigan, USA, 2014.

ASTM, A370-18 Standard Test Methods and Definitions for Mechanical Testing of Steel Products. Washington, USA, 2018.

ASTM, C39/C39M-18 Método de Ensayo Normalizado para Resistencia a la Compresión de Especímenes Cilíndricos de Concreto. Washington, USA, 2018.

ASTM, E2126-11 Standard Test Methods for Cyclic (Reversed) Load Test for Shear Resistance of Vertical Elements of the Lateral Force Resisting Systems for Buildings. Washington,

USA, 2018.

A. A. Mamun, “Origin of the Bauschinger effect in a polycrystalline material”, Materials Science and Engineering, A, vol. 707, pp. 576-584, 2007. DOI:10.1016/j.

msea.2017.09.09.

Comments

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2023 Andrea Solís, Alejandro Navas Carro

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.