Estrategias metacognitivas de un grupo de estudiantes brasileños en actividades de modelación matemática
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15517/aie.v23i1.51512Palabras clave:
modelación matemática, metacognición, estrategias metacognitivas, educación superiorResumen
El artículo tiene como objetivo investigar el potencial de la modelación matemática para promover estrategias metacognitivas. La investigación, de naturaleza cualitativa, se basa en un marco teórico y considera datos obtenidos de estudiantes de un curso de Licenciatura en Matemáticas, en una universidad brasileña, durante los años 2020 y 2021. Los resultados indican que estas estrategias son desencadenadas por las demandas de las diferentes fases de una actividad de modelación, caracterizadas por: interacción, matematización, resolución, interpretación y validación; elaboración de un informe y comunicación de resultados. Aunque la metacognición es un atributo personal, se ha manifestado a través de estrategias tanto individuales como colaborativas. Las actividades se realizaron en dos momentos diferentes de familiarización del estudiantado con la modelación y, aunque no hubo diferencias en la cantidad, hay indicios de que en la actividad del tercer momento surgieron estrategias que pueden haber contribuido más al desempeño del grupo, tanto en la competencia para hacer modelación como en su desempeño matemático. La identificación de estrategias metacognitivas promovidas por las demandas de las actividades lleva a la conclusión de que en el contexto de la investigación, constituyen un ejemplo de un entorno metacognitivamente apropiado.
Descargas
Referencias
Almeida, Lourdes Maria Werle. (2018). Considerations on the use of mathematics in modeling activities. ZDM, 50(1), 19-30.
Almeida, Lourdes Maria Werle., e Brito, Dirceu dos Santos. (2005). Atividades de modelagem matemática: que sentido os alunos podem lhe atribuir? Ciência & Educação (Bauru), 11, 483-497.
Almeida, Lourdes Maria Werle., Castro, Élida Maiara Velozo., e Gomes, Joice Caroline Sander. (2021). Estratégias metacognitivas em atividades de modelagem matemática. Anais do VIII Seminário Internacional de Pesquisa em Educação Matemática (SIPEM) (pp. 2029-2043). Uberlândia, MG, Brasil. https://even3.blob.core.windows.net/anais/ANAIS.217ec246892448a4bead.pdf
Almeida, Lourdes Maria Werle., Castro, Élida Maiara Velozo., e Silva, Maria Helena. (2021). Recursos semióticos em atividades de modelagem matemática e o contexto on-line. Alexandria: Revista de Educação em Ciência e Tecnologia, 14(2), 383-406.
Almeida, Lourdes Maria Werle., e Silva, Karina Alessandra Pessoa. (2021). Ciclo de modelagem matemática interpretado à luz de estratégias heurísticas dos estudantes. Rencima, 12(2), 1-27.
Almeida, Lourdes Maria Werle., Silva, Karina Pessoa., and Vertuan, Rodolfo Eduardo. (2018). Modelagem Matemática na Educação Básica (5ª reimp.). São Paulo: Contexto.
Blum, Werner. (2015). Quality teaching of mathematical modelling: What do we know, what can we do? In Sung Je Cho (Ed.), The Proceedings of the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education: Intellectual and attitudinal challenges (pp. 73-96). New York, NY: Springer.
Bogdan, Robert., and Biklen, Sari Knopp. (2007). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods. Pearson Education.
Bransford, John., Brown, Ann., and Cocking, Rodney. (2000). How people learn (Vol. 11). Washington, DC: National academy press.
Brown, Ann. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms. In Franz Emanuel Weinert, and Rainer H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 65–116). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
De Boer, Hester., Donker, Anouk S., Kostons, Danny D.N.M., and Van der Werf, Greetje P.C. (2018). Long-term effects of metacognitive strategy instruction on student academic performance: A metaanalysis. Educational Research Review, 24, 98–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.03.002
Desoete, Annemie. and De Craene, Brigitte. (2019). Metacognition and mathematics education: an overview. ZDM, 51(4), 565–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01060-w
Dignath, Charlotte., e Büttner, Gerhard. (2018). Teachers’ direct and indirect promotion of self-regulated learning in primary and secondary school mathematics classes—Insights from video-based classroom observations and teacher interviews. Metacognition and Learning, 13, 127–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-018-9181-x
Eilerts, Katja., e Kolter, Jana. (2015). Strategieverwendung durch Grundschulkinder bei Modellierungsaufgaben. In Gabriele Kaiser and Hans-Wolfgang Henn (Eds.), Werner Blum und seine Beiträge zum Modellieren im Mathematikunterricht (pp. 119-133). Springer Spektrum, Wiesbaden.
Ferri, Rita Borromeo. (2018). Mathematical Modeling Days and Projects: Go for More. In Rita Borromeo Ferri, Learning How to Teach Mathematical Modeling in School and Teacher Education (pp. 121-133). Springer, Cham.
Flavell, John Henry. (1978). Metacognitive development. In Joseph Scandura and Charles Brainerd (Eds), Structural process theories of complex human behavior (pp. 213-245). The Netherlands: Sijthoff & Noordoffp.
Flavell, John Henry. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In Lauren Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence (pp. 231–236). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Garnica, Antonio Vicente Manfioti. (2001). Pesquisa qualitativa e Educação (Matemática): de regulações, regulamentos, tempos e depoimentos. Mimesis, Bauru, 22(1), 35-48.
Harris, Karen., Santangelo, Tanya., and Graham, Steve. (2010). Metacognition and strategy instruction in writing. In Harriet Salatas Waters and Walter Schneider (Eds.), Metacognition, strategy use, and instruction (pp. 226–256). New York: Guilford.
Hidayat, Riyan., Zamri, Sharifah Norul Akmar Syed., Zulnaidia, Hutkemri., and Yuanita, Putri. (2020). Meta-cognitive behaviour and mathematical modelling competency: Mediating effect of performance goals. Heliyon, 6(4), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03800
Hidayat, Riyan., Zulnaidi, Hutkemri., e Zamri, Sharifah Norul Akmar. (2018). Roles of metacognition and achievement goals in mathematical modeling competency: A structural equation modeling analysis. PloS One, 13(11), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206211
Jacobs, Janis., e Paris, Scott. (1987). Children's metacognition about reading: Issues in definition, measurement, and instruction. Educational psychologist, 22(3-4), 255-278.
Kaiser, Gabriele., and Brand, Susanne. (2015). Modelling competencies: Past development and further perspectives. In Gloria Stillman, Werner Blum and Maria Salett Biembengut (Eds.), Mathematical Modelling in Education Research and Practice (pp. 129-149). Springer, Cham.
Kim, Young Rae., and Moore, Tamara. (2019). Multiple Levels of Metacognition: Circumstances Interfering with Students' Spontaneous Metacognitive Activities. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 9(1), 158-178.
Lüdke, Menga., e André, Marli. (1986). Pesquisa em Educação: abordagens qualitativas. São Paulo, EPU.
Maaß, Katja. (2010). Classification scheme for modelling tasks. Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik, 31(2), 285-311.
Magiera, Marta., and Zawojewski, Judith. (2019). Principles for Designing Research Settings to Study Spontaneous Metacognitive Activity. In Scott A. Chamberlin and Bharath Sriraman (Eds.). Affect in Mathematical Modeling (pp. 53-66). Springer, Cham.
Mahdavi, Mohsen. (2014). An overview: Metacognition in education. International Journal of Multidisciplinary and current research, 2(may-june), 529-535.
McCormick, Christine. (2003). Metacognition and learning. In William M. Reynolds, Gloria Miller and Irving Weiner (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Educational psychology (pp. 79–102). Wiley.
Pollak, Henry. (1970). Applications of Mathematics. Teachers College Record, 71(5), 311-334.
Pollak, Henry. (2011). What is mathematical modeling? Journal of Mathematics Education at Teachers College, 2(1), 64.
Rosa, Cleci Werner., e Alves, José Filho de Pinho. (2012). Evocação espontânea do pensamento metacognitivo nas aulas de física: estabelecendo comparações com as situações cotidianas Investigações em Ensino de Ciências, 17(1), 7-19.
Schneider, Wolfgang, e Artelt, Cordula. (2010). Metacognition and mathematics education. ZDM, 42(2), 149-161.
Schraw, Gregory., e Moshman, David. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational psychology review, 7(4), 351-371.
Schraw, Gregory. (1998). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. Instructional science, 26, 113-125.
Schukajlow, Stanislau., Kaiser, Gabriele., and Stillman, Gloria. (2018). Empirical research on teaching and learning of mathematical modelling: A survey on the current state-of-the-art. ZDM, 50(1), 5-18.
Stillman, Gloria. (2011). Applying Metacognitive Knowledge and Strategies in Applications and Modelling Tasks at Secondary School. In Gabriele Kaiser, Werner Blum, Rita Borromeo Ferri and Gloria Stillman (Eds), Trends in Teaching and Learning of Mathematical Modelling (ICTMA 14) (pp. 165-180). Dordrecht: Springer.
Vorhölter, Katrin., and Krüger, Alexandra. (2021). Metacognitive strategies in modeling: Comparison of the results achieved with the help of different methods. Quadrante, 30(1), 178-197.
Vorhölter, Katrin., Krüger, Alexandra., and Wendt, Lisa. (2019). Metacognition in mathematical modeling – An overview. In Scott A. Chamberlin and Bharath Sriraman (Eds.), Affect and mathematical modeling (pp. 29-51). Cham: Springer.
Vorhölter, Katrin. (2017). Measuring metacognitive modeling competencies. In Gloria Stillman, Werner Blum and Gabriele Kaiser (Eds.), Mathematical modeling and applications: Crossing and researching boundaries in mathematics education (pp. 175–185). Springer.
Vorhölter, Katrin. (2018). Conceptualization and measuring of metacognitive modelling competencies: Empirical verification of theoretical assumptions. ZDM, 50(1), 343-354.
Vorhölter, Katrin. (2019). Enhancing metacognitive group strategies for modelling. ZDM, 51(4), 703-716.
Williams, Joana., and Atkins, Grant. (2009). The role of metacognition in teaching reading comprehension to primary students. In Douglas J. Hacker, John Dunlosky and Arthur C. Graesser (Ed.), Handbook of Metacognition in Education (pp. 26-44). New York: Routledge.
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2022 Élida Maiara Velozo de Castro, Lourdes Maria Werle Almeida
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Todos los artículos y los ensayos publicados están protegidos por las licencias Creative Commons (CC), bajo el estándar Atribución-No Comercial-Compartir Igual - CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 que constituyen un complemento al derecho de autor tradicional, en los siguientes términos: primero, siempre debe reconocerse la autoría del documento referido; segundo, ningún artículo o ensayo publicado en la Revista ACTUALIDADES INVESTIGATIVAS EN EDUCACIÓN puede tener fines comerciales de ninguna naturaleza; y tercero, las adaptaciones del manuscrito deben compartirse bajo los mismos términos.
