Revista de Biología Tropical ISSN Impreso: 0034-7744 ISSN electrónico: 2215-2075

OAI: https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/rbt/oai
Density, distribution, and activity of the ocelot Leopardus pardalis (Carnivora: Felidae) in Southeast Mexican rainforests
PDF (Español (España))
HTML (Español (España))

Keywords

camera-trapping
capture-recapture
Los Chimalapas
CJS Model
camera-trapping
capture-recapture
Los Chimalapas
CJS Model

How to Cite

Pérez-Irineo, G., & Santos-Moreno, A. (2014). Density, distribution, and activity of the ocelot Leopardus pardalis (Carnivora: Felidae) in Southeast Mexican rainforests. Revista De Biología Tropical, 62(4), 1421–1432. https://doi.org/10.15517/rbt.v62i4.12941

Abstract

The ocelot Leopardus pardalis is of particular significance in terrestrial communities due to its ecological role within the group of small-sized felids and as a mesopredator. However, despite the reduction of ocelot habitat in Southeast Mexico, there are still very few ecological studies. This research aimed to contribute with some ecological aspects of the species in this region. For this, 29 camera trap stations were established in a rain forest in Los Chimalapas (an area of 22km2) during a two years period (March 2011-June, 2013), in Oaxaca state, Southeast Mexico. Data allowed the estimation of the population density, activity pattern, sex ratio, residence time, and spatial distribution. Population density was calculated using Capture-Recapture Models for demographically open populations; besides, circular techniques were used to determine if nocturnal and diurnal activity varied significantly over the seasons, and Multiple Discriminant Analysis was used to determine which of the selected environmental variables best explained ocelot abundance in the region. A total of 103 ocelot records were obtained, with a total sampling effort of 8 529 trap-days. Density of 22-38individuals/100km2 was estimated. Ocelot population had a high proportion of transient individuals in the zone (55%), and the sex ratio was statistically equal to 1:1. Ocelot activity was more frequent at night (1:00-6:00h), but it also exhibited diurnal activity throughout the study period. Ocelot spatial distribution was positively affected by the proximity to the village as well as by the amount of prey. The ocelot population here appears to be stable, with a density similar to other regions in Central and South America, which could be attributed to the diversity of prey species and a low degree of disturbance in Los Chimalapas.
https://doi.org/10.15517/rbt.v62i4.12941
PDF (Español (España))
HTML (Español (España))

References

Burnham, K. P. & Anderson, D. R. (2002). Model Selection and Inference –A Practical Information– Theoretic Approach. Nueva York: Springer-Verlag.

Carbone, C., Pettorelli, N., & Stephens, P. A. (2011). The bigger they come, the harder they fall: body size and prey abundance influence predator-prey ratios. Biology Letters, 7, 312-315.

Caso, A. (1994). Home range and habitat use of three neotropical carnivores in Northeast Mexico. (Master´s thesis). Texas University, Kingville.

Ceballos, G., Chávez, C., List, R., & Zarza, H. (2007). Conservación y manejo del jaguar en México. Estudios de caso y perspectivas. Ciudad de México: Alianza WWF/Telcel, Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad, UNAM, Comisión Nacional de Áreas Naturales Protegidas & EcoCiencia S.C.

Choquet, R., Lebreton, J. D., Gimenez, O., Reboulet, A. M., & Pradel, R. (2009). U-CARE: Utilities for performing goodness of fit tests and manipulating Capture-Recapture data. Ecography, 32, 1071-1074.

Cooch, E. & White, G. (2012). Program Mark. Analysis of data from marked individuals. A gentle introduction. Nueva York: Connell University.

de Oliveira, T. G., Tortato, M. A., Silveira, L., Kasper, C. B., Mazim, F. D., Lucherini, M., ... & Sunquist, M. (2010). Ocelot ecology and its effect on the small-felid guild in the lowland neotropics. In D. W. Macdonald & A. J. Loveridge (Eds.), Biology and conservation of wild felids (pp. 559-596). Nueva York: Oxford University Press.

Di Bitetti, M. S., Paviolo, A., & De Angelo, C. (2006). Density, habitat use and activity patterns of ocelots (Leopardus pardalis) in the Atlantic Forest of Misiones, Argentina. Journal of Zoology, 270, 153-163.

Di Bitetti, M. S., Paviolo, A., De Angelo, C. D., & Di Blanco, Y. E. (2008a). Local and continental correlates of the abundance of a Neotropical cat, the ocelot (Leopardus pardalis). Journal of Tropical Ecology, 24, 189-200.

Di Bitetti, M. S., Paviolo, A., Ferrari, C. A., De Angelo, C. D., & Di Blanco, Y. E. (2008b). Differential responses to hunting in two sympatric species of brocket deer (Mazama americana and M. nana). Biotropica, 40, 636-645.

Díaz-Pulido, A. & Payan, E. (2011). Densidad de ocelotes (Leopardus pardalis) en Los Llanos Colombianos. Mastozoología Neotropical, 18, 63-71.

Dillon, A. & Kelly, M. J. (2008). Ocelot home range, overlap and density: comparing radio telemetry with camera trapping. Journal of Zoology, 275, 391-398.

Emmons, L. H. (1988). A field study of ocelot (Felis pardalis) in Peru. Review d´Ecologie, 43, 133-157.

Esri. (2008). ArcGis version 9.3. http://www.esri.com/software/arcgis

González-Maya, J. F. & Cardenal-Porras, J. (2011). Ocelot density in the Caribbean slope of the Talamanca region, Costa Rica. Hystrix, the Italian Journal of Mammalogy, 22, 355-360.

Gregorio, L. C. (2012). Estimación de algunos parámetros demográficos poblacionales de tepezcuintle (Cuniculus paca) en San Antonio Nuevo Paraíso, Santa María Chimalapa, Oaxaca. Informe técnico de Residencia Profesional. Oaxaca: Instituto tecnológico del Valle de Oaxaca.

Grigione, M. M., Menke, K., López-González, C., List, R., Banda, A., Carrerea, J., … & Van Pelt, B. (2009). Identifying potential conservation areas for felids in the USA and Mexico: integrating reliable knowledge across an international border. Oryx, 43, 78-86.

Gutiérrez-González, C. E., Gómez-Ramírez, M. A., & López-González, C. A. (2012). Estimation of the density of the near threatened jaguar Panther onca in Sonora, Mexico, using camera trapping and an open population model. Oryx, 46, 431-437.

Haines, A. M., Tewes, M. E., Laack, L. L., Grant, W. E., & Young, J. (2005). Evaluating recovery strategies for an ocelot (Leopardus pardalis) population in the United States. Biological Conservation, 126, 512-522.

Harmsen, B. J., Foster, R. J., Silver, S. C., Ostro, L. E. T., & Doncaster, C. P. (2011). Jaguar and puma activity patterns in relation to their main prey. Mammalian Biology, 76, 320-324.

Harveson, P. M., Tewes, M. E., Anderson, G. L., & Laak, L. L. (2004). Habitat use by ocelots in south Texas: implications for restoration. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 32, 948-954.

Hatten, J. R., Averril-Murray, A., & Van Pelt, W. E. (2003). Characterizing and mapping potential jaguar habitat in Arizona. Nongame and Endangered Wildlife Program, Technical Report 203. Arizona: Game and fish Department.

Hintze, J. (2010). NCSS Statistical data analysis software. http://www.ncss.com

Inegi. (2000). Red hidrológica escala 1:50 000 y modelo digital de elevación 1:50 000. http://www.inegi.org.mx

Karanth, K. U. & Nichols, J. D. (1998). Estimation of tiger densities in India using photographic captures and recaptures. Ecology, 79, 2852-2862.

Karanth, K. U., Nichols, J. D., Kumar, N. S., Link, W. A., & Hines, J. E. (2004). Tigers and their prey: predicting carnivore densities from prey abundance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101, 4854-4858.

Kitchen, A. M., Gese, E. M., & Schauster, E. R. (2000). Changes in coyote activity patterns due to reduced exposure to human persecution. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 78, 853-857.

Kolowski, J. M. & Alonso. A. (2010). Density and activity patterns of ocelots (Leopardus pardalis) in northern Peru and the impact of oil exploration activities. Biological Conservation, 143, 917-925.

Kovach Computing Services. (2011). Software Oriana version 4. http://www.kovcomp.co.uk/oriana/oribroc.html

Laak, L. L. (1991). Ecology of the ocelot (Felis pardalis) in south Texas. (Master´s thesis). Texas University, Kingsville.

Lebreton, J. D., Burnham, K. P., Clobert, J., & Anderson, D. R. (1992). Modeling survival and testing biological hypotheses using marked animal: A unified approach with case studies. Ecological Monographs, 62, 67-118.

Lindenmayer, D. B., Lacy, R. C., & Viggers, K. L. (1998). Modeling survival and capture probabilities of the mountain brushtail possum (Trichosurus caninus) in the forests of southeastern Australia using trap-recapture data. Journal of Zoology, 245, 1-13.

Lira-Torres, I., Galindo-Leal, C., & Briones-Salas, M. (2012). Mamíferos de la Selva Zoque, México: riqueza, uso y conservación. Revista de Biología Tropical, 60, 781-797.

López-González, C. A., Brown, D. E., & Gallo-Reynoso, J. P. (2003). The ocelot Leopardus pardalis in north-western Mexico: ecology, distribution and conservation status. Oryx, 37, 358-364.

Ludlow, M. E. & Sunquist, M. E. (1987). Ecology and behavior of ocelots in Venezuela. National Geographic Research, 3, 447-461.

Maffei, L., Noss, A. J., Cuéllar, E., & Rumiz, D. I. (2005). Ocelot (Felis pardalis) population densities, activity, and ranging behaviour in dry forest of Eastern Bolivia: data from camera trapping. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 21, 1-6.

Maffei, L. & Noss, A. J. (2008). How small is too small? Camera trap survey areas and density estimates for ocelots in the Bolivian Chaco. Biotropica, 40, 71-75.

Mares, R., Moreno, R. S., Kays, R. W., & Wikelski, M. (2008). Predispersal home range shift of an ocelot Leopardus pardalis (Carnivora: Felidae) on Barro Colorado Island, Panama. Revista de Biología Tropical, 56, 779-787.

Martínez, E. (1997). Estudio ecológico del ocelote (Leopardus pardalis) en la zona de Chamela, Jalisco, México. (Tesis de Maestría). UNAM, México D. F.

Martínez-Calderas, J. M., Rosas-Rosas, O. C., Martínez-Montoya. J. F., Tarango-Arámbula, L. A., Clemente-Sánchez, F., Crosby-Galván, M. M., & Sánchez Hermosillo, M. D. (2011). Distribución del ocelote (Leopardus pardalis) en San Luis Potosí, México. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad, 82, 997-1004.

Monroy-Vilchis, O., Rodríguez-Soto, C., Zarco-González, M., & Urios, V. (2009). Cougar and jaguar habitat use and activity patterns in central Mexico. Animal Biology, 59, 145-157.

Monroy-Vilchis, O., Zarco-González, M. M., Rodríguez-Soto, C., Soria-Díaz, L., & Urios V. (2011). Fototrampeo de mamíferos en la Sierra Nanchititla, México: abundancia relativa y patrón de actividad. Revista de Biología Tropical, 59, 373-383.

Moreno, R. S., Kays, R. W., & Samudio, R. (2006). Competitive release in diets of ocelot (Leopardus pardalis) and puma (Puma concolor) after jaguar (Panthera onca) decline. Journal of Mammalogy, 87, 808-816.

Murray, J. L. & Gardner, G. L. (1997). Leopardus pardalis. Mammalian Species, 548, 1-10.

Ortega del Valle, D., Carranza, T., & Martínez, J. (2012). Una mirada desde el corazón de la jícara de oro. Experiencias de conservación en la Selva Zoque de Los Chimalapas. Oaxaca: WWF-México.

Parroquin, J., Gallina, S., Aguirre, G., & Pérez, J. (2010). El tepezcuintle: estrategias para su aprovechamiento con base en la evaluación de su población y hábitat en el ejido Loma de Oro, Uxpanapa, Veracruz, México. In M. M. Guerra Roa, S. Calmé, S. Gallina, & E. J. Naranjo (Eds.), Uso y manejo de fauna Silvestre en el norte de Mesoamérica (pp. 137-160). Xalapa: Secretaria de Educación de Veracruz.

Paviolo, A., Di Blanco, Y. E., De Angelo, C. D., & Di Bitetti, M. (2009). Protection affects the abundance and activity patterns of pumas in the Atlantic Forest. Journal of Mammalogy, 90, 926-934.

Polisar, J., Maxit, I., Scognamillo, D., Farrell, L., Sunquist, M. E., & Eisenberg, J. (2003). Jaguar, pumas, their prey base, and cattle ranching: ecological interpretation of a management problem. Biological Conservation, 109, 297-310.

Pollock, K. H. (1982). A capture-recapture design robust to unequal probability capture. Journal of Wildlife Management, 46, 752-757.

Reyes, J., Mas, J., & Velázquez, A. (2010). Trends of tropical deforestation in Southeast Mexico. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 31, 180-196.

Salas, S. H., Schibli, L., & Torres, E. (2001). La importancia ecológica y biológica. In A. Aparicio Cid (Ed.), Chimalapas, la última oportunidad (pp. 29-47). Ciudad de México: Word Wildlife Found y Secretaria del medio Ambiente, Recursos Naturales y Pesca.

Santos-Moreno, A., Briones-Salas, M. A., & López-Wilchis, R. (2007). Diferencias en algunos parámetros demográficos de Oryzomys chapmani (Rodentia: Muridae) asociadas a tres estados sucesionales de bosque mesófilo de montaña en Oaxaca, México. Acta Zoológica Mexicana (n.s.), 23, 123-137.

Santos-Moreno, A. & Pérez-Irineo, G. (2013). Estimación de abundancia de tepezcuinte (Cuniculus paca) y de su relación con la presencia de competidores y depredadores. Therya, 4, 89-98. Retrieved from http://www1.inecol.edu.mx/azm/_231_2007.htm

Semarnat. (2010). Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-059-SEMARNAT-2010, Protección ambiental-Especies nativas de México de flora y fauna silvestres. Categoría de riesgo y especificaciones para su inclusión, exclusión o cambio. Lista de especies en riesgo. México: Diario Oficial de la Federación.

Sokal, R. R. & Oden, N. L. (1978). Spatial autocorrelation in Biology. 1. Methodology. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 10, 199-228.

Stanley, T. R., & Richards, J. D. (1999). CloseTest. A program for testing capture-recapture data for closure, v. 3. Colorado: US Geological Survey.

Statsoft. (2005). Statistical data analysis software, version 7.1. http://www.statsoft.com

Sunquist, M. & Sunquist, F. (2002). Wild cats of the world. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Torres, E. J. (2009). Densidad, abundancia, uso de hábitat y patrones de actividad del ocelote (Leopardus pardalis) en la zona noreste del Estado de Quintana Roo: Estudio usando cámaras trampa. (Tesis de Maestría). Colegio de la Frontera Sur, México.

Trejo, I. (2004). Clima. In A. J. García-Mendoza, M. J. Ordoñez & M. Briones-Salas (Eds.), Biodiversidad de Oaxaca (pp. 67-85). Ciudad de México: Instituto de Biología, UNAM-Fondo Oaxaqueño para la Conservación de la Naturaleza-Word Wildlife Fund.

Trolle, M. & Kéry, M. (2003). Estimation of ocelot density in the Pantanal using capture-recapture analysis of camera-trapping data. Journal of Mammalogy, 84, 607-614.

Trolle, M. & Kéry, M. (2005). Camera-trap study of ocelot and other secretive mammals in the northem Pantanal. Mammalia, 69, 405-412.

Valenzuela, D., & Vázquez, L. B. (2007). Consideraciones para priorizar la conservación de carnívoros mexicanos. In G. Sánchez-Rojas & A. Rojas-Martínez (Eds.), Tópicos en sistemática, biogeografía, ecología y conservación de mamíferos (pp. 197-214). Hidalgo: Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo.

Zar, J. H. (1999). Biostatistical Analysis. Nueva Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Comments

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2014 Revista de Biología Tropical

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.