Revista de Biología Tropical ISSN Impreso: 0034-7744 ISSN electrónico: 2215-2075

Spatial and temporal distribution and microhabitat use of aquatic breeding amphibians (Anura) in a seasonally dry tropical forest in Chamela, Mexico


reproductive strategies
environmental seasonality
reproductive activity
indirect development.
estrategias de reproducción
estacionalidad del medio ambiente
actividad reproductiva
bosque tropical seco
desarrollo indirecto.

How to Cite

Luna-Gómez, M. I., García, A., & Santos-Barrera, G. (2017). Spatial and temporal distribution and microhabitat use of aquatic breeding amphibians (Anura) in a seasonally dry tropical forest in Chamela, Mexico. Revista De Biología Tropical, 65(3), 1082–1094.


The distribution of amphibians is affected by abiotic and biotic factors, availability of resources and the characteristics of reproductive sites. In particular, reproductive activity of aquatic-breeding anurans that inhabit tropical dry areas is affected by rainfall, which determines the availability and quality of reproductive sites. In this study, we analyzed the spatial and temporal distribution of anurans with indirect development in a tropical dry forest in Western Mexico, during two rainy seasons (July 10-October 4, 2013, and June 26-September 26, 2014). We collected data on the occupancy and reproductive activity of 15 species in four temporary streams, and evaluated their relationship with precipitation, humidity and temperature. We determined richness, abundance and diversity of species in each stream; we also identified differences in the reproductive strategies and microhabitats used by the species. The most abundant species were: Tlalocohyla smithii and Exerodonta smaragdina, whereas the least abundant were Leptodactylus melanonotus and Incilius mazatlanensis. Species richness, abundance and reproductive activity peaked alongside the stream with the greatest number of breeding sites (e.g. pools). We found temporal segregation in the occupancy and reproductive activity of species in all streams which were mainly associated with precipitation. However, occupancy and reproductive activity of some species overlapped up to four weeks during part of the breeding season. Most species used specific substrates for particular reproductive activities (e.g. oviposition), but used a range of microhabitats (leaf-litter, water, rocks, branches, leaves, logs, etc.) for others (e.g. calling). We discuss these behavioral differences as factors that facilitate coexistence of species in this environment in the rainy season.


Afonso, L. G., & Eterovick, P. C. (2007). Microhabitat choice and differential use by anurans in forest rivers in southeastern Brazil. Journal of Natural History, 41, 937-948.

Azevedo-Ramos, C. B. A., Magnusson, W. E., & Bayliss, P. (1999). Predation as the key factor structuring tadpole assemblages in a savanna area in Central America. Copeia, 22-33.

Bernarde, P. S., & Anjos, L. (1999). Distribuição espacial e temporal da anurofauna no Parque Estadual Mata dos Godoy, Londrina, Paraná, Brasil. Comunicações do Museu de Ciencia e Tecnología, 12, 127-140.

Bertoluci, J. (1998). Annual patterns of breeding activity in Atlantic rainforest anurans. Journal of Herpetology, 32, 607-611.

Bertoluci, J., & Rodrigues, M. T. (2002). Seasonal patterns of breeding activity of atlantic rainforest anurans at Boracéia, Southeastern Brazil. Amphibia-Reptilia, 23, 161-167.

Bullock, S. H. (1986). Climate of Chamela, Jalisco, and trends in the south coastal region of México. File for Meteorology, Geophysics and Bioclimatology, 36, 297-316.

Cardoso, A. J., Andrade, G. V., & Haddad, C. F. B. (1989). Distribuição espacial em comunidades de anfíbios (Anura) no sudeste do Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Biologia, 49, 241-249.

Carrasco, F. A. (1989). Contribución al conocimiento del ciclo reproductor y alimentación de una población de sapos Bufo marinus, en la costa de Chamela, Jalisco. (Tesis de Licenciatura). Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México, D. F., México.

Casas-Andreu, G. (1982). Reptiles y Anfibios de la Costa Suroeste de Jalisco, con aspectos sobre su ecología y biogeografía. (Tesis de Doctorado). Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México, D.F, México.

Ceballos, G., & García, A. (1995). Conserving neotropical biodiversity: The role of dry forest in Western Mexico. Conservation Biology, 9, 1349-1356.

Ceballos, G., Szekely, A., García, A., Rodríguez, P., & Noguera, F. A. (1999). Plan de Manejo de la Reserva de la Biósfera Chamela-Cuixmala. México, D.F.: Instituto Nacional de Ecología, SEMARNAP.

Crump, M. L. (1974). Reproductive strategies in a tropical anuran community. Miscellaneous Publication of the Museum of Natural History, University of Kansas, 61, 1-68.

Crump, M. L. (1982). Amphibian reproductive ecology on the community level. In Jr. N. J. Scott. (Ed.), Herpetofaunal Communities: A symposium of the study of amphibians and reptiles and the herpetologist league (pp. 21-36). Washington, DC: Widlife Reserch Report 13.

Crump, M. L., & Scott, N. J. Jr. (1994). Visual encounter surveys. In W. R. Heyer, M. A. Donnely, R. W. McDiarmid, L. C. Hayeck, & M. S. Foster (Eds.), Measuring and monitoring biological diversity, standard methods for amphibians (pp. 84-92). Washigton, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.

Curi, L. M., Céspedez, J. A., & Álvarez, B. B. (2014). Composición, distribución espacial y actividad de vocalización de un ensamble de anuros dentro de la región fitogeográfica del Chaco Oriental. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad, 85, 1197-1205.

Duellman, W. D., & Trueb, L. (1994). Biology of Amphibians. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Eterovick, P. C., & Sazima, I. (2000). Structure of an anuran community in a montane meadow in southeastern Brazil: Effects of seasonality, habitat, and predation. Amphibia-Reptilia, 21, 439-461.

Ford, P. L., & Scott, N. J. Jr. (2006). Community level analysis of opportunistically-breeding anurans in western México. Herpetological Natural History, 2, 177-182.

Frost, D. R. (2016). Amphibian Species of the World: an Online Reference. Version 6.0 (Date of access). Electronic Database accessible at American Museum of Natural History, New York, USA.

Galatti, U. (1992). Population biology of the frog Leptodactylus pentadactylus in a central amazonian rainforest. Journal of Herpetology, 26, 23-31.

García, A. (2003). Biogeography, ecology and conservation of the herpetofauna from western Mexico. (Tesis de Doctorado). University of New Mexico, New Mexico, United States of America.

García, A., & Ceballos, G. (1994). Guía de campo de los reptiles y anfibios de la costa de Jalisco, México. México: Fundación Ecológica de Cuixmala, A.C., Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.

García, A., & Cabrera-Reyes, A. E. (2008). Estacionalidad y estructura de la vegetación en la comunidad de anfibios y reptiles de la Estación de Biología Chamela, Jalisco, México. Acta Zoológica Mexicana, 24, 91-115.

García-Oliva, F., Maass, J. M., & Galicia, L. (1995). Rainstorm analysis and rainfall erosivity of a seasonal tropical region with a strong cyclonic influence in the Pacific Coast of Mexico. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 11, 2491-2498.

Gascon, C. (1991). Population- and community-level analyses of species occurrences of central amazonian rainforest tadpoles. Ecology, 72, 1731-1746.

Gottsberger, B., & Gruber, E. (2004). Temporal partitioning of reproductive activity in a neotropical anuran community. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 20, 271-280.

Heyer, W. R. (1973). Ecological interactions of frog larvae at a seasonal tropical location in Thailand. Journal of Herpetology, 7, 337-361.

Lawler, S. P., & Morin, P. J. (1993). Temporal overlap, competition, and priority effects in larval anurans. Ecology, 74, 174-182.

Lott, E. J., Bullock, S. H., & Solis-Magallanes, J. A. (1987). Floristic diversity and structure of upland and arroyo forests of coastal Jalisco. Biotropica, 19, 228-235.

Mendenhall, C. D., Frishkoff, L. O., Santos-Barrera, G., Pacheco, J., Mesfun, E., Mendoza, F., & Pringle, R. M. (2014). Countryside biogeography of neotropical reptiles and amphibians. Ecology, 95, 856-870.

Moreira, G., & Lima, A. P. (1991). Seasonal patterns of juvenile recruitment and reproduction in four species of leaf litter frogs in central Amazonia. Herpetologica, 47, 295-300.

Morin, P. J. (1987). Predation, breeding asynchrony, and the outcome of competition among treefrog tadpoles. Ecology, 68, 675-683.

Oliveira, F. F. R., & Eterovick, P. C. (2010). Patterns of spatial distribution and microhabitat use by syntopic anuran species along permanent lotic ecosystems in the cerrado of southeastern Brazil. Herpetologica, 2, 159-171.

Ponssa, M. L. (2004). Utilización espacial y temporal de una comunidad de anuros de Kent’s Marsh (Gamboa, Panamá). Revista Española de Herpetología, 8, 5-18.

Pough, H. F., Stewart, M. M., & Thomas, R. G. (1977). Physiological basis of habitat partitioning in Jamaican Eleutherodactylus. Oecologia, 24, 285-293.

Ramirez-Bautista, A. (1994). Manual y claves ilustradas de los anfibios y reptiles de la Región de Chamela. Jalisco, México: Cuadernos del Instituto de Biología 23, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.

Ramírez-Bautista, A., & García, A. (2002). Diversidad de la herpetofauna de la región de Chamela. In F. Noguera, J. H. Vega-Rivera, A. N. García-Aldrete & M. Quesada-Avendaño (Eds.), Historia Natural de Chamela (pp. 251-263). México, DF: Instituto de Biología, UNAM.

Rossa-Feres, D., & Jim, J. (2001): Similaridade do sítio de vocalização em uma comunidade de anfíbios anuros na região noroeste do Estado de São Paulo, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Zoología, 18, 439-454.

Saenz, D., Fitzgerald, L. A., Baum, K. A., & Conner, R. M. (2006). Abiotic correlates of anuran calling phenology: the importance of rain, temperature, and season. Herpetological Monographs, 1, 64-82.

Santos, T. G., Rossa-Feres, D. C., & Asatti, L. C. (2007). Diversidade e distribuição espaço-temporal de anuros em região com pronunciada estação seca no sudeste do Brasil. Iheringia, Série Zoologia, 97, 37-49.

Schalk, C. M., & Saenz, D. (2016). Environmental drivers of anuran calling phenology in a seasonal Neotropical ecosystem. Austral Ecology, 41, 16-27.

Suazo-Ortuño, I., Alvarado-Díaz, J., & Martínez-Ramos, M. (2008). Effects of conversion of dry tropical forest to agricultural mosaic on herpeto faunal assemblages. Conservation Biology, 22, 362-374.

Thomas, N., Morrison, C., Winder, L., & Morley, C. (2011). Spatial distribution and habitat preferences of co-ocurring vertebrate species: case study of an endangered frog and introduce toad in Fiji. Pacific Conservation Biology, 1, 68-77.

Trejo, I., & Dirzo, R. (2000). Deforestation of seasonally dry tropical forest: A national and local analysis in Mexico. Biological Conservation, 94, 133-142.

Urbina-Cardona, J. N., Olivares-Pérez, M., & Reynoso, V. H. (2006). Herpetofauna diversity and microenvironment correlates across a pasture–edge–interior ecotone in tropical rainforest fragments in the Los Tuxtlas Biosphere Reserve of Veracruz, Mexico. Biological Conservation, 132, 61-75.

Vasconcelos, T. S., & Rossa-Feres, D. C. (2005). Diversidade, distribução espacial e temporal de anfibios anuros (Amphibia, Anura) na região noroeste do estado de São Paulo, Brasil. Biota Neotropica, 5, 1-14.

Zimmerman, B. L. (1994). Audio strip transects. In W. R. Heyer, M. A. Donelly, R. W. McDiarmid, L. C. Hayeck, & M. S. Foster (Eds.), Measuring and monitoring biological diversity, standard methods for amphibians (pp. 84-92). Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.



Download data is not yet available.