INTERMEDIALITY IN THE 21ST CENTURY

Authors

  • Ruth Cubillo Paniagua Universidad de Costa Rica Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15517/dre.v14i2.8444

Keywords:

Intermediality, new technologies, comparative studies, transdisciplinarity, literature.

Abstract

Frenetic and paradoxical movement marking 21st century social coexistence is producing changes in representations of reality due to changes in our representations of the world and on how we live on it. Intermediality is a useful concept because it allows us to perceive dialoguing spaces among signifying practices—or artistic and cultural processes—and media and digital devices. Some questions rise by putting this point on intermediality: What is going on when several ontological artistic traditions establish a dialogue with digital technologies’ ways of expression?  What are the consequences of this intermediality concept?  Thinking of an academic framework: Are new areas of studies created by this notion? What are the consequences of this intermediality concept on the teaching-learning processes and on the research we do in our disciplines? What are the consequences of this intermediality concept on the cultural industry and on cultural heritage of our countries?  This essay answers some of those questions while the other are rose in order to promote a necessary debate.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Ruth Cubillo Paniagua, Universidad de Costa Rica

    Doctora en Literatura por la Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, España. Profesora catedrática de la Escuela de Filología y del Posgrado en Literatura de la Universidad de Costa Rica. Coordinadora del Programa de Investigación en Literatura Comparada, Escuela de Lenguas Modernas de la Universidad de Costa Rica.

References

Chappel, F. (Ed.). (mayo 2008). On Intermediality. [En Intermedialidad]. Revista de Estudios Culturales de la Universitat Jaume I. 6 (1), 19-29. ISSN: 1697-7750.

Elleström, L. (Ed.). (2010). Media, Borders, Multimodality and Intermediality [Fronteras, medios, multimodalidad e intermedialidad]. Houndmills Palgrave Macmillan.

Felten, U., Maurer, I. (Eds.). (2007). Intermedialidad en Hispanoamérica: rupturas e intersticios. Tübingen: Stauffenburg Verlag

Herlinghaus, H. (Ed.). (2002). Narraciones anacrónicas de la modernidad. Melodrama e intermedialidad en América Latina. Chile: Editorial Cuarto Propio.

Kattenbelt, Ch. (mayo 2008). Intermediality in Theatre and Performance: Definitions, Perceptions and Medial Relationships. [Intermedialidad en Teatro y Performance: Definiciones, percepciones y relaciones mediales]. En: Chappel, F. (Ed.). On Intermediality. [En Intermedialidad]. Revista de Estudios Culturales de la Universitat Jaume I. 6 (1), 19-29. ISSN: 1697-7750.

López, A. (2011). Génesis semiótica de la intermedialidad: fundamentos cognitivos y socio-constructivistas de la comunicación. Madrid: CIC Cuadernos de Información y Comunicación.

Mattelart, A. (1998). ¿Cómo resistir a la colonización de las mentes? Pensamiento crítico vs. Pensamiento único. Madrid: Le Monde Diplomatique, edición española.

Rajewsky, I. (2005). Intermediality, Intertextuality, and Remediation: A Literary Perspective on Intermediality [Intermedialidad, intertextualidad y remediar: una perspectiva literaria en intermedialidad]. Intermédialités, 1(6). Recuperado de http://cri.histart.umontreal.ca/cri/fr/intermedialites/p6/pdfs/p6_rajewsky_text.pdf

Downloads

Published

2013-11-28

How to Cite

INTERMEDIALITY IN THE 21ST CENTURY. (2013). Diálogos. Revista Electrónica De Historia, 14(2), 169-179. https://doi.org/10.15517/dre.v14i2.8444

Similar Articles

1-10 of 47

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.