Keywords
Returns to education
Cohorts
How to Cite
Abstract
A pseudo-panel approach is used to estimate the returns to schooling (RTS) in Costa Rica. This approach ameliorates the “ability” bias due to the correlation between the level of education and nonobservable characteristics of the individual.We found that RTS are higher for older samples. Once we study the behavior of the RTS -using different settings and estimators- we analyze their correlation withDeaton’s year, cohort and age effects. We found that the income of younger cohorts is greater than the income of older cohorts, once experience and short run fluctuations of the economy are accounted for. This difference in income between generations is explained by differences in levels of education. Other factors that differ between generations seem to be less important to explain their income differences. Finally, we present preliminary evidence suggesting that short run fluctuations of the GDP affect in a greater extent those with less education.
References
Alegre J. and L. Pou. 2008. “El Consumo y la Tasa de Ahorro Privados de los Hogares Españoles: Una Descomposición de los Efectos Edad y Cohorte”. Investigaciones Económicas, XXXII(1): 87-121.
Card D. 1994. “Earnings, schooling and ability revisited”. NBER Working Paper Series No. 4832.
Browning M.; A. Deaton. and Margaret I. 1985. “A Profitable Approach to Labor Supply and Commodity Demands Over The Life-Cycle”. Econometrica, 53(3): 503-543.
Deaton A. 1985. “Panel data from time series of cross-sections”. Journal of Econometrics, 30: 109-126.
Deaton A. 1997. The analysis of household surveys: A microeconometric approach. World Bank and John Hopkins University Press.
Deaton A. and Christina P. 1994. “Saving, growth, and aging in Taiwan”. In David A. Wise (ed.), Studies in the Economics of Aging, Chicago University Press for the National Bureau of Economic Research.
Devereux P. 2007a. “Improved error-in-variables estimators for grouped data”. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 25(3): 278-287.
Devereux P. 2007b. “Small-Sample Bias in Synthetic Cohort Models of Labor Supply”. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22: 839-848.
Dickerson A.; F. Green and J. Saba. 2001. “Trade liberalization and returns to education: A pseudo-panel approach”. Studies in Economics No. 0114, Department of Economics, University of Kent.
Funkhouser E. 1999. “Cyclical Economic Conditions and School Attendance in Costa Rica”. Economics of Education Review, 14: 31-50.
Funkhouser E. 1998. “Changes in the returns to education in Costa Rica”. Journal of Development Economics, 57: 289-317.
Funkhouser E. 1996. “The urban informal sector in Central America: Household survey evidence”. World Development, 24(11): 1737-1751.
Gindling T. H. and J. D. Trejos. 2005. “Accounting for changing earnings inequality in Costa Rica, 1980-99”. The Journal of Development Studies, 41(5): 898-926.
Gourinchas P. and J. Parker. 2002. “Consumption over the life cycle”. Econometrica, 70(1): 47-89.
Kaymak B. 2008. “Essays in education, selection and wage dynamics”. Doctoral thesis, University of Rochester, New York.
Montiel N.; A. Ulate; L. Peralta y J. D. Trejos. 1997. “La educación en Costa Rica: ¿un solo sistema?”. IICE, Serie de Divulgación Económica No. 28, Febrero.
Propper C.; H. Rees and K. Green. 2001. “The demand for private medical insurance in the UK: A cohort analysis”. The Economic Journal, 111(471), Conference Papers, C180-C200.
Psacharopoulos G. 1993. “Returns to investment in education: A global update”. Policy Research Working Paper WPS1067, Latin America and the Caribbean Region, The World Bank.
Psacharopoulos G. and Y. Ng. 1992. “Earnings and education in Latin America: Assessing priorities for schooling investments”. Policy Research Working Paper WPS1056, Latin America and the Caribbean Region, The World Bank.
Psacharopoulos G. and H. Patrinos. 2004. “Returns to investment in education: A further update”. Education Economics, 12(2): 111-136.
Robbins D. and T. H. Gindling. 1999. “Trade liberalization and the relative wages for more-skilled workers in Costa Rica”. Review of Development Economics, 3(2): 140-154.
Trejos J. D. and T. H. Gindling. 2004. “Inequality in Central America in the 1990s”. CEPAL Review, 84: 175-196.
Verbeek M. 2008. “Pseudo-panels and repeated cross-sections”. In L. Matyas and P. Sevestre (eds.), The Econometrics of Panel Data: Fundamentals and Recent Developments in Theory and Practice, Third Edition, Springer, Berlin, 370-383.
Verbeek M. and T. Nijman. 1993. “Minimum MSE estimation of a regression model with fixed effects from a series of cross-sections”. Journal of Econometrics, 59: 125-136.
Verbeek M. and T. Nijman. 1992. “Can cohort data be treated as genuine panel data?”. Empirical Economics, 17: 9-23.
Warunsiri S. and R. McNown. 2009. “The return to education in Thailand: A pseudo-panel approach”. IBS Working Paper, University of Colorado at Boulder.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported License.
Copyright (c) 2013 Luis Rojas