Inclusive Design Based on the Biological Basis of Creative Thinking: a Critique of Anthropocentrism

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15517/es.v16i1.8564

Keywords:

anthropology, bioethics, sustainability

Abstract

This research critically analyzes the influence of anthropocentrism on Design, arguing that the centrality of the human has limited the sustainability, equity, and ecological resilience of design solutions. Through a qualitative methodology based on a systematic literature review, critical-argumentative analysis, and theoretical triangulation –drawing on Deep Ecology, Posthumanism, and Actor-Network Theory– the dominant paradigms that perpetuate this hierarchical vision are identified and deconstructed. The essay proposes a conceptual shift towards a biocentric and interspecific design, grounded in the biological bases of non-human creative thinking. Unlike conventional biomimetic approaches, it emphasizes the agency and creativity of other species as an ethical and projective foundation, thereby promoting a design practice that learns from and collaborates with natural systems. It concludes that this rethinking not only offers technical alternatives but constitutes an act of ontological decolonization, necessary for transitioning towards more just, sustainable, and resilient models of coexistence. The main contribution lies in integrating perspectives from Environmental Humanities and Bioethics to rethink design from a symbiocentric and situated framework, particularly relevant for Global South contexts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abreu-Hernández, L. F. (2023). De la sociedad maquinal a la sociedad de la vida y la biósfera. Bioethics Update, 6(2), 101-114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioet.2020.09.004

Aristóteles. (1984). The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation (J. Barnes, Ed., 2 vols.). Princeton University Press.

Bugnyar, T. (2024). Why are ravens smart? Exploring the social intelligence hypothesis. Journal of Ornithology, 165(1), 15-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-023-02111-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-023-02111-6

Caicedo, M., David, O., Campis, R. J. y Bermúdez, E. (2024). Social Mechanisms, Antropomorphism and Cognitive Processes in Non-Human Animals. 40 Years after Chimpanzee Politics. ArtefaCToS. Revista de Estudios Filosóficos sobre la Ciencia y la Tecnología, 13(1), 167-208. https://doi.org/10.14201/art2024.31500 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14201/art2024.31500

Carvajal, R. (2024). Reflexiones sobre la mente: de la filosofía a la neurofisiología. Lógoi: Revista de Filosofía, (45), 13-52. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Reflexiones-sobre-la-mente%3A-de-la-filosof%C3%ADa-a-la-Carvajal/18395776f619a19fea7ea04dc0ec919c1f1a471d DOI: https://doi.org/10.62876/lr.vi45.6477

Chavarri, R. y Sánchez, R. M. (2024). Aportaciones de la biomimética a la Economía Solidaria: integrar soluciones provenientes de la naturaleza. Revista de Economía Mundial, (67), 71-97. https://doi.org/10.33776/rem.vi67.8139 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33776/rem.vi67.8139

Deplazes-Zemp, A. (2023). Beyond Intrinsic and Instrumental: Third-Category Value in Environmental Ethics and Environmental Policy. Ethics, Policy & Environment, 27(2), 166-188. https://doi.org/10.1080/21550085.2023.2166341 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21550085.2023.2166341

Droz, L. (2022). Anthropocentrism as the scapegoat of the environmental crisis: a review. Ethics in Science and Environmental, 22(1), 25-49. https://doi.org/10.3354/esep00200 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3354/esep00200

Estupiñán, J. C. y Rodríguez, M. (2024). Integridad: base de un diseño consciente y consecuente. Actas de Diseño, (45), 270-275. https://doi.org/10.18682/add.vi45

Fiallo Cardona, G. C. (2024). DISEÑAR CIUDAD CON EL RÍO. Principios de diseño urbano a partir del caso del río Tunjuelo en Bogotá. Seminario Internacional de Investigación en Urbanismo, (15), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.5821/siiu.12698 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5821/siiu.12698

Figerri, F. P. y Bellei Neto, O. (2024). Biocentrismo ancestral: desde América Latina la ecología puede ser más profunda. Revista Wirapuru, 5(9), 1-16. https://revistas.ungs.edu.ar/index.php/wirapuru/article/view/1408

Galdón, F. (2024). The Polygenetic Designer. En C. Bremmer, P. A. Rodgers y G. Innella (Eds.), Design for the Unthinkable World (pp. 59-78). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003370680-6

García Figueroa, J. (2024). Biomimética, sustentabilidad y diseño. Voces y saberes, 4(11), 54-67. https://doi.org/10.22201/fesa.vocesysaberes.2024.11.87 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22201/fesa.vocesysaberes.2024.11.87

García Miguélez, M. P., Vázquez Burguete, J. L., Gonzalo Serna, V. y Vega Vega, O. (2024). Todo al Azul: La Apuesta de Biotherm. Casos de Marketing Público y No Lucrativo, 11(2), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11221625

Gero, A., Winterford, K. y Davila, F. (2024). A Pacific community resilience framework: Exploring a holistic perspective through a strengths-based approach and systems thinking. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 65(3), 1-19. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/apv.12411 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/apv.12411

Giraldo, E. C. (2024). Entre fricciones: explorando las perspectivas de Donna Haraway, Anna Tsing y Olafur Eliasson en el estudio de cohabitancias humanas y más que humanas. (pensamiento),(palabra)... Y obra, (31), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.17227/ppo.num31-21404 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17227/ppo.num31-21404

Grioni, M. L. (2024). Educación, diseño y sostenibilidad. El desafío de repensar el diseño. Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México. DOI: https://doi.org/10.62166/area.30.2.2951

Guillén de Romero, J., Calle García, J., Gavidia-Pacheco, A. M. y Vélez Santana, A. G. (2020). Desarrollo sostenible. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 26(4), 293-307. https://www.redalyc.org/journal/280/28065077023/

Haraway, D. (2023). When species meet. En A. Franklin (Ed.), The Routledge International Handbook of More-than-Human Studies (pp. 42-78). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003262619-4

Hourdequin, M. (2024). Environmental Ethics: From Theory to Practice. Bloomsbury Academic. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350185890

Jacobs, A., Busseniers, E., Claes, S., Huybrechts, L., van Leemput, M. y Hannes, K. (2024). Co-Designing Multispecies Speculations Through Biofuturing. Qualitative Inquiry, 31(2), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778004241231919 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10778004241231919

Jönsson, L., Tironi, M., Hermansen, P. y Wilkie, A. (2022). Editorial: Doing and Undoing Post-Anthropocentric Design. En D. Lockton, S. Lenzi, P. Hekkert, A. Oak, J. Sádaba y P. Lloyd (Eds.), DRS2022: Bilbao, 25 June 3 July (pp. 1-3). Design Research Society. https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2022.1068 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2022.1068

Kaufmann, A. (2024). All animals are conscious in their own way: comparing the markers hypothesis with the universal consciousness hypothesis. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1405394. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1405394 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1405394

Khan, I., Afzal Faheem, M. y Ahmed, S. (2024). Beyond Anthropocentric Interests: Moving towards Ecological Sustainability in Kalidasa’s Shakuntala through Deep Ecology, Biocentric equality and Ecotopia. Harf-O-Sukhan, 8(2), 1552-1561. https://harf-o-sukhan.com/index.php/Harf-o-sukhan/article/view/1661

Kennedy, B. S. y Boreyko, J. B. (2024). Bio-Inspired Fog Harvesting Meshes: A Review. Advanced Functional Materials, 34(35), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202306162 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202306162

Laporte, R. (2022). La cuarta Revolución Industrial. Análisis de viabilidad e impacto. Palermo Business Review, (25), 39-58. https://www.palermo.edu/negocios/cbrs/pdf/pbr25/00_PBR_25_03.pdf

Latour, B. (2013, 18-28 de febrero). Facing Gaia. Six lectures on the political theology of nature [archivo PDF]. Being the Gifford Lectures on Natural Religion, Edinburgh. https://www.earthboundpeople.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Bruno-Latour-Gifford-Lectures-Facing-Gaia-in-the-Anthropocene-2013.pdf

Laursen, J. C. (2024). Kant as a Baylean atheist. Con-textos Kantianos: International Journal of Philosophy, 19, 87-92. https://doi.org/10.5209/kant.94162 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5209/kant.94162

León, E. A., Barria-Asenjo, N. A., Colqui, J. A., Salas, G. y Rosales, J. A. P. (2024). Retorno a Bruno Latour. Pensando la teoría del actor red como un espacio urbano. Discusiones Filosóficas, 25(44), 71-96. https://doi.org/10.17151/difil.2024.25.44.5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17151/difil.2024.25.44.5

Li, J. (2024). Beyond Human-Centrism: Embracing Interspecies Co-creation and Ecological Recalibration in Biodesign Education. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33774/coe-2024-5lnw2

Lyon, S. N., Tomoleoni, J. A., Yee, J. L. y Fujii, J. A. (2024). Foraging ecology of southern sea otters at the northern range extent informs regional population dynamics. Endangered Species Research, 54, 383-394. https://doi.org/10.3354/esr01348 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3354/esr01348

Mikkonen, J. y Raatikainen, K. J. (2024). Aesthetics in Biodiversity Conservation. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 82(2), 174-190. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaac/kpae020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jaac/kpae020

Millstein, R. L. (2024). The Land Is Our Community. Aldo Leopold’s Environmental Ethic for the New Millennium. University of Chicago Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226834474.001.0001

Noreña, S. G., Bernal, G., Cardona, O. D., Rincón, D. F. y Carreño, M. L. (2024). Holistic evaluation of climate risk to prioritise adaptation measures for ecosystems. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 109, 104593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104593 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104593

Norman, D. (2024). El diseño de las cosas cotidianas. Capitán Swing Libros.

Oviedo, L. V. (2024). Reflexiones filosóficas sobre el marco teórico de la etología de Frans de Waal. Brazilian Journal of Animal and Environmental Research, 7(3), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.34188/bjaerv7n3-070 DOI: https://doi.org/10.34188/bjaerv7n3-070

Pozo Puértolas, R. (2024). Proceso creativo: un enfoque holístico. Gráfica, 13(25), 155-161. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/grafica.356 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/grafica.356

Rivera, J. A. (2024). Moral y civilización. Una historia. Arpa Editores.

Romani, A., Castani, F. y Lanniello, A. (2022). Codesign with more-than-humans: toward a meta co-design tool for human-non-human collaborations. European Journal of Futures Research, 10(17), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40309-022-00205-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40309-022-00205-7

Shaikh, I. R., Pillai, S. K. B., Widarmanti, T., Ramantoko, G. y Rachmawati, I. (2024). Planned Obsolescence: Bibliometric Analysis from 1967 to 2024. Nanotechnology Perceptions, 20(5), 22-51. https://nano-ntp.com/index.php/nano/article/view/2020/1574 DOI: https://doi.org/10.62441/nano-ntp.v20i5.2

Singer, P. (2023). Animal Liberation Now. Random House.

Sokienah, Y. (2024). Behind the designs: An exploration of sustainability attitudes among interior design students in Jordan. Heliyon, 10(7), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36443 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36443

Tomitsch, M., Clasen, K., Duhart, E. y Lutz, D. (2024). Reflections on the Usefulness and Limitations of Tools for Life-Centred Design. En C. Gray, E. Ciliotta Chehade, P. Hekkert, L. Forlano, P. Ciuccarelli, & P. Lloyd (Eds.), DRS2024: Boston, 23–28 June, Boston, Estados Unidos. DRS Digital Library. (pp. 1-18). https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2024.724 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2024.724

Ullrich, J. (2024). Animal Artistic Agency: Contemporary Interspecies Art and Relational Aesthetics. En S. Anker y S. Flach (Eds.), The Cultures of Entanglement (pp. 149-256). Transcript Verlag. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839468050-013

van Leeuwen, E. J., DeTroy, S. E., Haun, D. B. y Call, J. (2024). Chimpanzees use social information to acquire a skill they fail to innovate. Nature Human Behaviour, 8, 891-902. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-01836-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-01836-5

Vilas Pazos, M. (2024). Comprendernos desde el contacto: los límites ontológicos más allá del antropocentrismo. Eikasía Revista de Filosofía, (120), 99-119. https://doi.org/10.57027/eikasia.120.843 DOI: https://doi.org/10.57027/eikasia.120.843

Wang, G. (2021). Val Plumwood and Lazozi in the Age of Anthropocene. En G. McCarthy y X. Song (Eds.), Transcultural Connections: Australia and China (pp. 163-174). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5028-4_10

Xia, Y., Shao, Y., Zheng, Y., Yan, X. y Lyu, H. (2024). Bridging Nature and Urbanization: A Comprehensive Study of Biophilic Design in the Knowledge Economy Era. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 16(1), 1-40. http://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-02023-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-02023-7

Yeater, D. B., Dudzinski, K. M., Melzer, D., Magee, A. R., Robinett, M. y Guerra, G. (2024). Training the Concept of Innovate in Dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) Is Both Creative and Cognitively Stimulating. Animals, 14(896), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14060896 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14060896

Published

2026-05-30

How to Cite

Inclusive Design Based on the Biological Basis of Creative Thinking: a Critique of Anthropocentrism. (2026). Revista Humanidades, 16(1), e8564. https://doi.org/10.15517/es.v16i1.8564