META-ANÁLISIS DEL EFECTO DE LA INTERFERENCIA CONTEXTUAL EN EL DESEMPEÑO DE DESTREZAS MOTRICES

Autores/as

  • Judith Jiménez Díaz Universidad de Costa Rica Autor/a
  • Walter Salazar Universidad de Costa Rica Autor/a
  • Maria Morera-Castro Universidad Nacional Autor/a

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15517/pensarmov.v14i2.23830

Palabras clave:

práctica aleatoria, práctica en bloque, meta-análisis, aprendizaje motor

Resumen

El presente estudio amplía un metaanálisis realizado recientemente y examina el Efecto de la Interferencia Contextual (EIC), por medio de la técnica metaanalítica. Después de una búsqueda de literatura en once bases de datos digitales y en referencias, 25 investigaciones cumplieron con los criterios de inclusión establecidos para el análisis intragrupo, mientras que 21 estudios para el análisis entregrupos. Bajo un modelo de efectos aleatorios, para el diseño intragrupose obtuvo un total de 150 Tamaños de Efecto (TE) individuales.Se encontróque el grupo de práctica en bloque (PB)mejoró su desempeño en la adquisición (TE= 0.69; n= 39; IC95%= 0.40 a 0.97)y lo disminuyó en la retención (TE= -0.25; n= 43; IC95%= -0.51 a -0.02). El grupo de práctica aleatoria (PA) mejoró en la adquisición (TE= 0.79;n= 31; IC95%= 0.43 a 1.16)y no presentó cambio en la retención (TE= 0.12; n= 37; IC95%= -0.12 a 0.38).Para el diseño entregrupos se obtuvo un total de 68 TEindividuales y se encontró que en la adquisición el grupo de PB presentó un desempeño mejor con respecto al grupo de PA (TE= -0.15; n= 31; IC95%= -0.32 a -0.01) y en la retención ambos grupos presentan un desempeño similar (TE= -0.02; n= 37; IC95%= -0.20 a 0.26). Los resultados apoyan el EIC en la adquisición. La presencia de variables moderadoras (edad de los participantes, cantidad de intentos, tipo de destreza y validez externa del estudio) confirman que este efecto no se puede generalizar  

Descargas

Los datos de descarga aún no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

  • Judith Jiménez Díaz, Universidad de Costa Rica
    Escuela de Educación Fisica y Depotes
  • Walter Salazar, Universidad de Costa Rica
    School of Physical Education and Sports

Referencias

Battig, W. F. (1966). Facilitation and interference. En E.A. Bilodeau (ed.), Acquisition of skill (pp. 215–244). Recuperado de https://books.google.co.cr/books/about/Acquisition_of_skill.html?id=ELAcAAAAMAAJ&redir_esc=y

Bertollo, M., Berchicci, M., Carraro, A., Comani, S., & Robazza, C. (2010). Blocked and random practice organization in the learning of rhythmic dance step sequences. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 110(1), 77–84. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pms.110.1.77-84

Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470743386

Brady, F. (1998). A theoretical and empirical review of the contextual interference effect and the learning of motor skills. Quest, 50(3), 266–293. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00336297.1998.10484285

Brady, F. (2004). Contextual Interference: A Meta-analytic study. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 99(1), 116–126. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pms.99.1.116-126

Broadbent, D. P., Causer, J., Ford, P. R., & Williams, A. M. (2015). Contextual interference effect on perceptual-cognitive skills training. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 47(6), 1243–1250. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1249/mss.0000000000000530

Cheong, J. P. G., Lay, B., Grove, J. R., Medic, N., & Razman, R. (2012). Practicing field hockey skills along the contextual interference continuum: A comparison of five practice schedules. Journal of Sports Science & Medicine, 11(2), 304–311. Recuperado de http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3737863/

French, K. E., Rink, J. E., & Werner, P. H. (1990). Effects of contextual interference on retention of three volleyball skills. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 71(1), 179–186. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pms.1990.71.1.179

Goodwin, J. E., & Meeuwsen, H. J. (1996). Investigation of the contextual interference effect in the manipulation of the motor parameter of over-all force. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 83(3), 735–743. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pms.1996.83.3.735

Granda-Vera, J., & Montilla-Medina, M. (2003). Practice schedule and acquisition, retention, and transfer of a throwing task in 6-yr.-old children. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 96(3), 1015-1024. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pms.2003.96.3.1015

Granda-Vera, J., Barbero-Alvarez, J. C., & Montilla-Medina, M. (2008). Effects of different practice conditions on acquisition, retention, and transfer of soccer skills by 9-year-old schoolchildren. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 106(2), 447-460. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pms.106.2.447-460

Hall, K. G., Domingues, D. A., & Cavazos, R. (1994). Contextual interference effects with skilled baseball players. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 78(3), 835–841. Recuperado de https://www.gwern.net/docs/spacedrepetition/1994-hall.pdf

Hebert, E. P., Landin, D., & Solmon, M. A. (1996). Practice schedule effects on the performance and learning of low-and high-skilled students: An applied study. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 67(1), 52-58. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1996.10607925

Jarus, T., & Goverover, Y. (1999). Effects of contextual interference and age on acquisition, retention, and transfer of motor skill. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 88(2), 437-447. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pms.1999.88.2.437

Jiménez, J., Salazar, W., & Morera, M. (2014). Interferencia contextual en el desempeño de destrezas motrices: Un metaanálisis. Pensar en Movimiento: Revista de Ciencias del Ejercicio y la Salud, 12(1), 1–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.15517/pensarmov.v12i1.10572

Jones, L. L., & French, K. E. (2007). Effects of contextual interference on acquisition and retention of three volleyball skills. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 105(3), 883-890. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pms.105.3.883-890

Keller, G. J., Li, Y., Weiss, L. W., & Relyea, G. E. (2006). Contextual interference effect on acquisition and retention of pistol-shooting skills. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 103(1), 241-252. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pms.103.1.241-252

Landin, D., & Hebert, E. P. (1997). A comparison of three practice schedules along the contextual interference continuum. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 68(4), 357-361. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1997.10608017

Lee, T. D., & Magill, R. A. (1983). The locus of contextual interference in motor-skill acquisition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9(4), 730,746. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.9.4.730

Lee, T. D., & Simon, D. A. (2004). Contextual interference. En A.M. Williams & N.J. Hodges (Eds), Skill acquisition in sport: Research, Theory and Practice (pp. 29–44). Recuperado de https://books.google.co.cr/books?id=vInfBe94KWcC&redir_esc=y

Li, Y., & Wright, D. L. (2000). An assessment of the attention demands during random-and blocked-practice schedules. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, 53(2), 591-606. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/027249800390628

Magill, R., & Hall, K. G. (1990). A review of the contextual interference effect in motor skill acquisition. Human Movement Science, 9(3-5), 241–289. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0167-9457(90)90005-x

Magill, R., & Anderson, D. (2013). Motor Learning and Control: Concepts and Applications ( Tenth Edition). Recuperado de . http://www.mheducation.com/highered/product.0078022673.html?searchContext=Motor+Learning+and+Control%3A+Concepts+and+Applications

Marín, F., & Sánchez, J. (1996). Estimadores del tamaño del efecto en meta-análisis: Un estudio Monte Carlo del sesgo y la eficiencia. Psicológica, 17, 467–482. Recuperado de http://www.um.es/metaanalysis/pdf/7022.pdf

Mazzardo, O. (2004). Contextual interference: Is it supported across studies? (Tesis de Maestría, Universidad de Pittsburgh). Recuperada de http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/9942/

Meira, C., & Tani, G. (2001). The Contextual Interference Effect in acquisition of dart-throwing Skill Tested on a Transfer Test with Extended Trials. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 92(3), 910-918. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pms.2001.92.3.910

Orwin, R. G. (1983). A fail-safe N for effect size in meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Statistics, 8(2), 157–159. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1164923

Pollatou, E., Kioumourtzoglou, E., Agelousis, N., & Mavromatis, G. (1997). Contextual interference effects in learning novel motor skills. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 84(2), 487-496. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pms.1997.84.2.487

Porter, J., & Saemi, E. (2010). Moderately Skilled Learners Benefit by Practicing with Systematic Increases in Contextual Interference. International Journal of Sport Science & Coaching, 4(2), 61-71. Recuperado de https://www.researchgate.net/publication/215727048_Moderately_skilled_learners_benefit_by_practicing_with_systematic_increases_in_contextual_interference

Shea, J. B., & Morgan, R. L. (1979). Contextual interference effects on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of a motor skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5(2), 179-187. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.5.2.179

Simon, D. A. (2007). Contextual interference effects with two tasks. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 105(1), 177-183. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pms.105.1.177-183

Smith, P. J. (1997). Attention and the contextual interference effect for a continuous task. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 84(1), 83-92. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pms.84.1.83-92

Smith, P. J. (2002). Applying contextual interference to snowboarding skills. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 95(3), 999-1005. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pms.2002.95.3.999

Thomas, J. R., & French, K. E. (1986). The use of meta-analysis in exercise and sport: A tutorial. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 57(3), 196–204. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1986.10605397

Travlos, A. K. (2010). Specificity and variability of practice, and contextual interference in acquisition and transfer of an underhand volleyball serve. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 110(1), 298-312. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pms.110.1.298-312

Wegman, E. (1999). Contextual interference effects on the acquisition and retention of fundamental motor skills. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 88(1), 182-187. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pms.88.1.182-187

Wright, D. L., Black, C. B., Immink, M. A., Brueckner, S., & Magnuson, C. (2004). Long-term motor programming improvements occur via concatenation of movement sequences during random but not during blocked practice. Journal of Motor Behavior, 36(1), 39-50. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/jmbr.36.1.39-50

Wright, D. L., Magnuson, C. E., & Black, C. B. (2005). Programming and reprogramming sequence timing following high and low contextual interference practice. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 76(3), 258-266. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2005.10599297

Zetou, E., Michalopoulou, M., Giazitzi, K., & Kioumourtzoglou, E. (2007). Contextual interference effects in learning volleyball skills. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 104(3), 995-1004. Recuperado de http://pms.sagepub.com/content/104/3/995

Publicado

2016-09-19

Cómo citar

Jiménez Díaz, J., Salazar, W., & Morera-Castro, M. (2016). META-ANÁLISIS DEL EFECTO DE LA INTERFERENCIA CONTEXTUAL EN EL DESEMPEÑO DE DESTREZAS MOTRICES. Pensar En Movimiento: Revista De Ciencias Del Ejercicio Y La Salud, 14(2), 1-34. https://doi.org/10.15517/pensarmov.v14i2.23830