logo

Scientific Papers

Vol. 18 No. 32 (2016): Journal 32

Implementation of a laboratory batching procedure with a correction for fines and moisture

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15517/6pq2tg52
Submitted
November 6, 2025
Published
2025-11-07

Abstract

The selection of an appropriate aggregate structure is a key step during mix design since this directly affects mix performance and the amount of asphalt in the mix. During conventional batching procedures, the aggregates are dried and sieved into different sizes only to be recombined later into the appropriate proportions to reproduce the design gradation. This type of procedure can produce gradations with substantially larger percent passing the sieve No.200 relative to the target gradation. This paper explores the effects that fines adhered to larger particles have on the batch gradation, the resulting optimum binder content and dust proportion. An improved batching procedure that corrects for fines adhered to larger particles and trapped moisture is presented in detail and shown to replicate the target design gradation more closely. The optimum asphalt content was determined by means of the Superpave® design method for both, a gradation batched conventionally and a gradation batched with the suggested corrected procedure. The results show that the optimum asphalt content and volumetrics obtained in both cases are substantially different. The procedure developed for the fines correction is recommended for routine batching in order to minimize the inclusion of additional fines that can potentially affect the performance characteristics of the mix.

References

  1. Anderson R.M., and Bahia, H.U. (1997). “Evaluation and Selection of Aggregate Gradation for Asphalt Mixtures Using Superpave.” Transportation Research Record No.1583, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 91-97.
  2. Buchanan, M.S. and Brown E.R. (1999). “Development and Potential Use of an Automated Aggregate Gradation Device.” Transportation Research Record No.1673, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 81-88.
  3. Corrales-Azofeifa, J. and Archilla, A. (2015).”Laboratory Batching Procedure Corrected for Fines and Moisture.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng., 10.1061/(ASCE)MT. 1943-5533.0001384, 04015102.
  4. D’Angelo, J.A., and Ferragut, T. (1991). “Summary of Simulation Studies from Demonstration Project No.74, Field Management of Asphalt Mixes.” Journal of the Association of Asphalt Pavement Technologies, Vol. 60, 287-309.
  5. Epps, A.L., and Hand, A.J. (2000). “Coarse Superpave Mixture Sensitivity.” Transportation Research Record No.1712, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 35-43.
  6. Greene, J., Kim, S. and Choubane, B. (2011). “Accelerated Pavement Testing and Gradation-Based Performance Evaluation Method.” Transportation Research Record No.2225, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 119-127.
  7. Kandhal, P.S., Lynn, C.Y. and Parker F. (1998). “Characterization Tests for Mineral Fillers Related to Performance of Asphalt Paving Mixtures.” Transportation Research Record No.1638, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 101-110.
  8. Mishra, D., Tutumluer, E. and Butt, A. (2010). “Quantifying Effects of Particle Shape and Type and Amount of Fines on Unbound Aggregate Performance Through Controlled Gradation.” Transportation Research Record No.2167, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 61-71.
  9. Rushing, J.F., Mejias, M., and Brown, E.R. (2010). “Development of Criteria for Using the Superpave Gyratory Compactor to Design Airport Pavement Mixtures.” Proc., 2010 FAA Worldwide Airport Technology Transfer Conference, Atlantic City, NJ, 2010.
  10. AASHTO (American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials). (2012a). “Standard Test Method for Superpave Volumetric Mix Design (M 323-12).” Washington, DC.
  11. AASHTO (American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials). (2012b). “Standard Test Method for Preparing and Determining the Density of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) Specimens by Means of the Superpave Gyratory Compactor (T 312-12).” Washington, DC.
  12. AASHTO (American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials). (2011). “Standard Test Method for Sieve Analysis of Fine and Coarse Aggregates (T 27-11).” Washington, DC
  13. The Asphalt Institute. (2015). “Asphalt Mix Design Methods (MS-2)”, Seventh Edition. Lexington, KY.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.