Keywords
Tomografía computarizada; Surco infraorbitario; Canal infraorbitario; Foramen infraorbitario.
How to Cite
Abstract
This study morphometrically assessed the infraorbital groove (IOG), canal (IOC) and foramen (IOF) on computed tomography (CT) scans of an Iranian population. This cross-sectional study evaluated the CT scans of 126 patients presenting to a hospital in Qazvin city, Iran during 2020-2022, who were selected by convenience sampling. An oral and maxillofacial surgeon and an oral and maxillofacial radiologist identified the relevant anatomical landmarks and the measurements were made by a trained senior dental student. Data were analyzed by independent t-test, and Pearson’s correlation test (alpha=0.05). The mean IOC length was 9.86±1.34 mm, the mean IOG length was 12.78±1.57 mm, the mean IOC-IOG angle was 136.78±6.90 degrees, the mean IOC-vertical plane angle was 26.92±5.74 degrees, the mean IOC-horizontal plane angle was 58.54±6.18 degrees, the mean horizontal distance between the IOF and the sagittal plane passing through the supraorbital notch (SON) was 4.85±0.98 mm, the mean horizontal distance between the IOF and the sagittal plane passing through the midline was 23.04±2.90 mm, the mean vertical distance between the IOF and infraorbital rim (IOR) was 9.22±1.45 mm, the mean distance between the IOF and anterior nasal spine (ANS) was 27.63±10.99 mm, the mean angle between the IOF and ANS was 33.52±5.46 degrees, and the mean soft tissue thickness over the IOF was 10.60±2.04 mm. No significant difference was found in the parameters based on age (P>0.05). IOF-midline and IOF-IOR distances were significantly greater in males than females (P<0.05). No other significant differences were found based on gender (P>0.05). According to the results, the IOF-midline and IOF-IOR distances were significantly greater in Iranian males than females. The obtained results regarding the position of IOC, IOF, and IOG on CT scans of the Iranian study population can help maximize the success of related clinical procedures.
References
Orhan K., Misirli M., Aksoy S., Seki U., Hincal E., Ormeci T., et al. Morphometric analysis of the infraorbital foramen, canal and groove using cone beam CT: considerations for creating artificial organs. Int J Artif Organs. 2016; 39 (1): 28-36.
Hwang S.H., Kim S.W., Park C.S., Kim S.W., Cho J.H., Kang J.M. Morphometric analysis of the infraorbital groove, canal, and foramen on three-dimensional reconstruction of computed tomography scans. Surg Radiol Anat. 2013; 35 (7): 565-71.
Singh R. Morphometric analysis of infraorbital foramen in Indian dry skulls. Anat Cell Biol. 2011; 44 (1): 79-83.
Bahsi I., Orhan M., Kervancioglu P., Yalcin E.D. Morphometric evaluation and surgical implications of the infraorbital groove, canal and foramen on cone-beam computed tomography and a review of literature. Folia Morphol (Warsz). 2019; 78 (2): 331-43.
Lee T., Lee H., Baek S. A three-dimensional computed tomographic measurement of the location of infraorbital foramen in East Asians. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 2012; 23 (4): 1169-73.
Nanayakkara D., Peiris R., Mannapperuma N., Vadysinghe A. Morphometric Analysis of the Infraorbital Foramen: The Clinical Relevance. Anat Res Int. 2016; 2016: 7917343.
Kazkayasi M., Ergin A., Ersoy M., Bengi O., Tekdemir I., Elhan A. Certain anatomical relations and the precise morphometry of the infraorbital foramen-canal and groove: an anatomical and cephalometric study. The Laryngoscope. 2001; 111 (4): 609-14.
Rahman M., Richter E.O., Osawa S., Rhoton A.L. Jr. Anatomic study of the infraorbital foramen for radiofrequency neurotomy of the infraorbital nerve. Neurosurgery. 2009; 64 (5 Suppl 2): 423-7; discussion 427-8.
Chung M.S., Kim H.J., Kang H.S., Chung I.H. Locational Relationship of the Supraorbital Notch or Foramen and Infraorbital and Mental Foramina in Koreans. Acta Anatomica. 2008; 154 (2): 162-6.
Chrcanovic B.R., Abreu M.H.N.G., Custódio A.L.N. A morphometric analysis of supraorbital and infraorbital foramina relative to surgical landmarks. Surgical and radiologic anatomy. 2011; 33: 329-35.
Dagistan S., Miloglu O., Altun O., Umar E.K. Retrospective morphometric analysis of the infraorbital foramen with cone beam computed tomography. Niger J Clin Pract. 2017; 20 (9): 1053-64.
Suresh S., Voronov P., Curran J. Infraorbital nerve block in children: a computerized tomographic measurement of the location of the infraorbital foramen. Regional anesthesia and pain medicine. 2006; 31 (3): 211-4.
Schumacher G.H. Principles of skeletal growth. Fundamentals of craniofacial growth. CRC Press; 2017 (pp. 1-22).