Keywords
educational tests
psychological tests
rule space method
métodos psicométrico-cognitivos
pruebas educativas
test psicológicos
método rule space
How to Cite
Abstract
The integration of cognitive elements with psychometric approaches is a promising field in the design ofeducational and psychological tests as well as in the interpretation of their results. Likewise, they provide evidences of construct validity since the proposed attributes are compared with the theoretical framework of the knowledge domain of interest. This article highlights the contributions of rule space method in cognitive diagnostic assessments.References
Artavia-Medrano, A. (2014). Evaluación cognitiva diagnóstica en Matemática: modelo elaborado con el método rule space para estudiantes costarricenses de undécimo año. (Tesis doctoral inédita). Universidad de Costa Rica, Costa Rica.
Bejar, I. (1984). Educational Diagnostic Assessment. Journal of Educational Measurement, 21(2), 175-189.Birenbaum, M., & Tatsuoka,
K. (1993). Applying an IRT-Based Cognitive Diagnostic Model to Diagnose Students’ Knowledge States in Multiplication and Division with Exponents. Applied Measurement in Education, 6(4), 255-268.
Birenbaum, M., Kelly, A., & Tatsuoka, K. (1992). Diagnostic Knowledge States in Algebra Using the Rule Space Model. (Technical Report RR-92-57-ONR). Nueva Jersey: Educational Testing Service.
Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2001). Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Embretson, S. E. (1999). Issues in the Measurement of Cognitive Abilities. In: S. E. Embretson & S. L. Hershberger (Eds.) The New Rules of Measurement: What Every Psychologist and Educator Should Know (pp. 1-15). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Gierl, M. J., & Cui, Y. (2008). Defi ning characteristics of diagnostic classifi cation models and the problem of retrofi tting in cognitive diagnostic assessment. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 6, 263-268.
Gierl, M. J., Leighton, J. P., & Hunka, S. M. (2007). Using the Attribute Hierarchy Method to Make Diagnostic Inferences About Examinees’ Cognitive Skills. In: J. P. Leighton & M. J. Gierl (Eds.) Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment: Theory and Applications (pp. 242-274). Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
Gierl, M., Roberts, M., Brito, C., & Gotzmann, A. (2009, abril). Using Judgments from Content Specialists to Develop Cognitive Models for Diagnostic Assessments. Artículo presentado en Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME), San Diego, CA.
Gorin, J. (2006). Test design with cognition in mind.Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 25(4), 21-35.
Hambleton, R., Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H. (1991). Fundamentals of Item Response Theory.California: SAGE Publications.
Im, S. (2007). Statistical Consequences of Attribute Misspecifi cation in the Rule Space Model. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Columbia University, Nueva York, EE. UU.
Leighton, J., & Gierl, M. (2007). Defi ning and Evaluating Models of Cognition Used in Educational Measurement to Make Inferences About Examineees’ Thinking Processes. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 26(2), 3-16.
Leighton, J., Gierl, M., & Hunka, S. (2002, abril). The attribute hierarchy model for cognitive assessment. Louisiana: Artículo presentado en Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME).
Messick, S. (1984). The Psychology of Educational Measurement. Journal of Educational Measurement, 21(3), 215-237.
Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientifi c inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist,50, 741-749.
Mislevy, R. (2006). Cognitive Psychology and Educational Assessment. In: R.L. Brennan (Ed.), Educational Measurement (4 ed., pp. 257-305). Nueva York: American Council on Education/Macmillan.
Mislevy, R., Steinberg, L., & Almond, R. (2003). On the Structure of Educational Assessments. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 1(1), 3-62.
Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Nichols, P. (1994). A framework for developing cognitively diagnostic assessments. Review of Educational Research, 64, 575-603.
Roussos, L. A., DiBello, L. V., Henson, R. A., Jang, E., & Templin, J. (2010). Skills Diagnosis for Education and Psychology With IRT-Based Parametric Latent Class Models. En S. E. Embretson (Ed.) Measuring Psychological Constructs: Advances in Model-Based Approaches. Washington: American Psychological Association.
Rupp, A., & Mislevy, R. (2007). Cognitive Foundations of Structured Item Response Models. In: J. P. Leighton & M. J. Gierl (Eds.) Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment: Theory and Applications (pp. 205-241). Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
Rupp, A. A., Templin, J., & Henson, R. A. (2010). Diagnostic Measurement: Theory, Methods, and Applications. Nueva York: The Guilford Press.
Shaw, D. S. (1986). Effects of adaptive diagnostic testing on two types of computerized remediation. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Snow, R.E., & Lohman, D.F. (1989). Implications of cognitive psychology for educational measurement. In R.L. Linn (Ed.), Educational Measurement (3 ed., pp. 263-331). Nueva York: American Council on Education/Macmillan.
Sternberg, R. (1986). Las capacidades humanas: un enfoque desde el procesamiento de la información. Barcelona: Editorial Labor.
Pellegrino, J., Baxter, G., & Glaser, R. (1999). Addressing the “Two Disciplines” Problem: Linking Theories of Cognition and Learning with Assessment and Instructional Practice. Review of Research in Education, 24, 307-353.
Pozo, J. I. (2002). Teorías cognitivas del aprendizaje. Madrid: Ediciones Morata.
Tatsuoka, K. (1983). Rule Space: An Approach for Dealing with Misconceptions Based on Item Response Theory. Journal of Educational Measurement, 20(4), 345-354.
Tatsuoka, K. (1985). A Probabilistic Model for Diagnosing Misconceptions by the Pattern Classifi cation Approach. Journal of Educational Statistics,10(1), 55-73.
Tatsuoka, K. (1987). Validation of cognitive sensivity for item response curves. Journal of Educational Measurement, 24(3), 233-245.
Tatsuoka, K. (1990). Toward an integration of item-response theory and cognitive error diagnosis. En: N. Frederiksen, R. Glaser, A. Lesgold & M. Shafto (Eds.) Diagnostic monitoring of skills and knowledge acquisition (pp. 453-488). Nueva Jersey: Erlbaum.
Tatsuoka, K. (2009). Cognitive Assessment: An Introduction to the Rule Space Method. Nueva York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.