The effect of Phosphorus concentration over the assimilation by three genotypes of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)

Authors

  • German Hernández Laboratorio de Rhizobiología. Estación Experimental de Nutrición Vegetal "La Renée". Instituto de Suelos. MINAG
  • Vidalina Toscano Laboratorio de Rhizobiología. Estación Experimental de Nutrición Vegetal "La Renée". Instituto de Suelos. MINAG
  • Nancy Méndez Laboratorio de Rhizobiología. Estación Experimental de Nutrición Vegetal "La Renée". Instituto de Suelos. MINAG
  • Luis Gómez Laboratorio de Rhizobiología. Estación Experimental de Nutrición Vegetal "La Renée". Instituto de Suelos. MINAG
  • Miguel Mullings Laboratorio de Rhizobiología. Estación Experimental de Nutrición Vegetal "La Renée". Instituto de Suelos. MINAG

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15517/am.v7i1.24794

Abstract

The experiment was carried out under green house conditions using 1000 cc pot hidroponic thechniques; it was oxigenated with 400 ml.l-1.minutes-1, where common bean plants arranged in randomized block design. The effect of 0; 0.25; 0.50; 0.75 and 1.00 mm of phosphorus concentration over the biomass developed by leafs, leafstalks, stalks, roots, pods; total biomass; the total plant phosphorus concentration and the phosphorus use efficiency shown the common bean variations (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) such as CC25-9(N), BAT 58 and BAT 304, were studied. There was found significative difference between the amount of biomass formed by leaf, stalk, pods and, the total plant biomass; the total plant phosphorus concentration changed in order of the phosphorus solution concentration used; while the phosphorus use efficien reached the uppermost value at 0.50 mm of phosphorus concentration. There is specific phosphorus incidence over the nutrition of bean genotype. The results showed that the different bean genotypes have different phosphorus requirements.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

HERNANDEZ, G.; GONZALEZ, A.; ALMAGUER, N.; BARBERIA, G.; TOSCANO, V.; SANCHEZ, M. 1993. Respuesta de dos cultivares de frijol común cultivados en suelos con concentraciones bajas, media y alta de fósforo. Informe del tema de investigaciones consumo de nutrimentos por cultivos económicos. In: Archivo Est. Exp. de Nutrición Vegetal “La Renée”. Instituto de Suelos. MINAG. 26 pag. Mimeografiado.

JACOBSEN, I. 1985. The role of Phosphorus in nitrogen fixation by young pea plants (Pisum sativum). Physiol Plant 64:190-196.

LONERAGAN, J.F.; ASHER, C.J. 1967. Response of plants to phosphate concentration in solution culture.II. Rate of phosphate absorption and its relation to growth. Soil Sci. 103:311-318.

MORISON, J.I.L.; BATTEN, G.D. 1986. Regulation of mesophyll Photosynthesis in intact wheat leaves by Cytoplasmis phosphate concentrations. Planta 168:200-206.

ROBSON, A.D. 1978. Mineral nutrients limiting nitrogen fixation in legumes. In: Cs. Andrew, E. J. Kamprath, eds. Mineral nutrition of legumes of tropical and subtropical soil. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Melbourne, Australia, pp 277-293.

SAWADA, S.; IGARASHI, T.; MIYACHI, S. 1983. Effects of phosphate nutrition on photosynthesis, starch, and total phosphorus levels in single rooted leaf of dwarf bean. Photosynthetica 17:484-490.

SIDDIQI, M.Y.; GLASS, A.D.M. 1981. Utilization index: A modelization efficiency in plants. J. Plant Nutr. 4:289-302.

SPEAR, N.W.; ASHER, C.J.; EDWARDS, D.G. 1978. Response of cassava, sunflower and maize to potassium concentration in solution. II. Potassium absorption and its relation to growth. Field crops. Res. 1:363-373.

STEENBJERG, F.; JACOBSEN, S.T. 1963. Plant nutrition and yield Curves. Soil Sci. 95:69-90.

WALKER. D.A.; SIVAK, M.N. 1985. Can phosphate limit photosynthetic carbon assimilation in vivo? Physiol. Veg. 23:829-841.

Published

2016-06-02

How to Cite

Hernández, G., Toscano, V., Méndez, N., Gómez, L., & Mullings, M. (2016). The effect of Phosphorus concentration over the assimilation by three genotypes of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Agronomía Mesoamericana, 7(1), 80–85. https://doi.org/10.15517/am.v7i1.24794

Most read articles by the same author(s)