Evaluación de dosis y métodos de aplicación de azufre y su efecto residual en el cultivo de maíz en dos localidades de Azuero, Panamá


  • Roman Gordon IDIAP.
  • Andrés González IDIAP.
  • Jorge Franco IDIAP.
  • Nivaldo De Gracia IDIAP.
  • Adys de Herrera IDIAP.
  • William Raun CIMMYT, Guatemala.




Two trials were conducted in 1990 in the zone of Azuero-Panama, to observe the response of the corn to the residual effect of sulphur (CaS04) under two application methods. In 1989, sulphur was broadcasted at arate of 0.20, 40 and 80 kg/ha, or handspiked at arate of 0.20 and 40 kg/ha. During the second cycle (1990), only 100 kg/ha of N were applied to the plots in order to observe the residual effect of the treatments. There was a lineal response for the two bypsum application methods in the first cycle, but there was no interaction among these two independent variables. The fact that one of the. highest yields wasobtained with a 20 kg/ha, doseshows us that a low dosage of this element is anough to  have significant responses. The resiudal response of the sulphur application (1990) was highly significant getting yield increments ranging from 0.483 to 1.682 t/ha. The economic analysis of the two cycles (1989-1990) showed that the sulphur application was profitable with respect to the dose 0 (zero), given the low cost of the agricultural gypsum.


Download data is not yet available.


BARROW, N. J. 1969. Effects of adsorption of sulfate by soils on the amount of sulfate present and ist availability to plants. Soil Sci. 108:193-201.

CENTRO INIERNACIONAL DE MEJORAMIENrO DE MAIZ Y TRIGO. 1988. La formulación de recomendaciones a partir de datos agronómicos: Un manual metodológico de evaluación económica. Edición completamente revisada. México D.F. méxico: CIMMYT 79p.

DAIGGER, L.A.; FOX, R. L 1971. Nitrogen and sulfur nutrition of sweet corn in relation to fertilization and water composition. Agron. J. 63:729-730.

ENSMlNGER, L E. 1954. Some factors affecting the adsorption of sulfate by Alabama soils. Soil. Soc. Am. Proc. 18:259-264.

KAMPRATH, E. J.; W. L NELSON; FITTS, J. W. 1956. The effect of pH, sulfate and phosphate concentration on the adsorption of sulfate by soils. Soil. Sci. Soco Am. Proc. 20:463-466.

KANG, B.T.; OSINAMA, O.A 1976. Sulfur response of maize ir Western Nigeria. Agron. Journ. 68: 333-336.

PASRlCHA, N.S.; AULAKH, M.S. 1986. Role of sulfur in the nutrition of groundnut. Fertilizer News. New Delhi, India. vol. 31, no. 9.



How to Cite

Gordon, R., González, A., Franco, J., De Gracia, N., de Herrera, A., & Raun, W. (2016). Evaluación de dosis y métodos de aplicación de azufre y su efecto residual en el cultivo de maíz en dos localidades de Azuero, Panamá. Agronomía Mesoamericana, 3, 52–56. https://doi.org/10.15517/am.v3i0.25206