Economic and microbiological evaluation of towels and cloths used during milking
Uso de toallas y paños durante el ordeño
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15517/am.v32i1.39667Keywords:
Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, hygiene, mastitis, udder, microbiological loadAbstract
Introduction. The practices before milking help promote healthy udders and the productivity of the animals. Objective. To realize an economic and microbiologic comparison of the use of cloths and towels during the teats disinfection. Materials and methods. This research was carried out in Tilaran, Guanacaste, Costa Rica between October and November 2018, in a production system that performs three milkings every 8 h and keeps its animals in complete stabling. A random five towels to dry the teats before milking were taken, which were washed and reused in the next milking. The towels were cut in half, both sides were identified, the relationship between them was maintained, one part was stored in an airtight bag (used towel), and the other one was washed, and its reuse was simulated. After being washed, both parts (ten cloths) were analyzed to quantify the population of Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and aerobes. For the economic analysis, the number of towels used per animal, the shelf life, the number of times used, the cost of each towel, water, electricity, chlorine, and liquid detergent were recorded. Results. The washing cycle used decreased 800 times of the population of Escherichia coli, by 5000 times the aerobes, and 500 times the Staphylococcus aureus. The paper towels analyzed had UFC g-1 lower than ten at the time of use. There is a similarity between the use of two towels/animal/milking with microfiber towels, and it rules out the use of three towels/animal/milking because it increases the cost by 48.59 %. Conclusion. There were no economic or microbial differences between the microfiber towels and the two paper towels used to dry the teats during the pre-selling.
Downloads
References
Bramley, A. J., Dodd, F. H., Mein, G. A., & Bramley, J. A. (1992). Machine milking and lactation. InsightBooks.
Brown, W. B., Williamson, N. B., & Carlaw, R. A. (1988). A diagnostic approach to educating Minnesota dairy farmers in the prevention and control of bovine mastitis. Preventive Veteterinary Medicine, 5(3), 197–211. http://doi.org/10.1016/0167-5877(88)90005-0
Caselli, E. (2017). Hygiene: microbial strategies to reduce pathogens and drug resistance in clinical settings. Microbial Biotechnology, 10(5), 1079–1083. http://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.12755
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2003). Guidelines for environmental infection control in health-care facilities: Recommendations of CDC and the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC). American Society for Healthcare Engineering, and American Hospital Association.
De-Koning, C. J. A. M. (2010). Automatic milking: A common practice on dairy farms. Precision Dairy Management. Recovered January 16, 2019 from http://www.precisiondairy.com/proceedings/s3dekoning.pdf
Diab-Elschahawi, M., Assadian, O., Blacky, A., Stadler, M., Pernicka, E., Berger, J., Resch, H., & Koller, W. (2010). Evaluation of the decontamination efficacy of new and reprocessed microfiber cleaning cloth compared with other commonly used cleaning cloths in the hospital. Amercian Journal Infection Control, 38(4), 289–292. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2009.09.006
Fox, L. K. (1997). Effectiveness of laundering udder cloth towels to reduce mastitis pathogens. Journal Dairy Science, 80(suppl. 1), 234.
Galton, D. M., Adkinson, R. W., Thomas, C. V., & Smith, T. W. (1982). Effects of premilking udder preparation on environmental bacterial contamination of milk. Journal Dairy Science, 65(8), 1540–1543. http://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(82)82379-5
Galton, D. M., Petersson, L. G., & Merrill, W. G. (1986). Effects of premilking udder preparation practices on bacterial counts in milk and on teats. Journal Dairy Science, 69(1), 260–265. http://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(86)80396-4
Galton, D. M., Petersson, L. G., Merrill, W. G., Bandler, D. K., & Shuster, D. E. (1984). Effects of premilking udder preparation on bacterial population, sediment, and iodine residue in milk. Journal Dairy Science, 67(11), 2580–2589. http://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(84)81616-1
Gibson, H., Sinclair, L. A., Brizuela, C. M., Worton, H. L., & Protheroe, R. G. (2008). Effectiveness of selected premilking teat-cleaning regimes in reducing teat microbial load on commercial dairy farms. Letters Applied Microbiology, 46(3), 295–300. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-765X.2007.02308.x
Instituto Metereológico Nacional. (2015). Clima en Costa Rica. El clima y las regiones climáticas de Costa Rica. Recuperado el 15 de mayo, 2020 de https://www.imn.ac.cr/documents/10179/31165/clima-regiones-climat.pdf/cb3b55c3-f358-495a-b66c90e677e35f57.
Jayarao, B. M., & Henning, D. R. (2001). Prevalence of foodborne pathogens in bulk tank milk. Journal Dairy Science, 84(10), 2157–2162. http://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(01)74661-9
Koster, G., Tenhagen, B. A., & Heuwieser, W. (2006). Factors associated with high milk test day somatic cell counts in large dairy herds in Brandenburg. I: Housing conditions. Journal of Veterinary Medicine, 53(3), 134–139. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0442.2006.00801.x
Knowlton, K. F., Wilkerson, V. A., Casper, D. P., & Mertens, D. R. (2010). Manure nutrient excretion by Jersey and Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 93(1), 4073–412. http://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2617
Kusumaningrum, H. D., Paltinaite, R., Koomen, A. J., Hazeleger, W. C., Romboutsand, F. M., & Reumer, R. R. (2003). Tolerance of Salmonella enteritidis and Staphylococcus aureus to surface cleaning and house hold bleach. Journal Food Protection, 66(12), 2289–2295. http://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-66.12.2289
Lavonen, E., Gonsior, M., Tranvik, L., Schmitt-Kopplin, P., & Kohler, S. (2013). Selective chlorination of natural organic matter: identification of previously unknown disinfection byproducts. Environmental Science & Technology, 47, 2264–2271. http://doi.org/10.1021/es304669p
Moore, G., & Griffith, C. A. (2006). Laboratory evaluation of the decontamination properties of microfibre cloths. Journal Hospital Infection, 64(4), 379–385. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2006.08.006
Moxley, J. E., Kennedy, B. W., Downeyand, B. R., & Bowman, J. S. T. (1978). Survey of milking hygiene practices and their relationships to somatic cell counts and milk production. Journal Dairy Science, 61(11), 1637–1644. http://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(78)83778-3
Petrovski, K. R., Trajcev, M., & Buneski, G. (2006). A review of the factors affecting the costs of bovine mastitis. Journal South African Veterinary Association, 77(2), 52–60. http://doi.org/10.4102/jsava.v77i2.344
Philpot, W., & Nickerson, S. (2000). Ganando la lucha contra la mastitis. Westfalia Surge Inc.
Radostits, O. M., Blood, D. C., Gay, C. C., Blood, D. C., & Hinchkliff, K. W. (2000). Veterinary medicine. 9th ed. ELBA-BailliereTindal.
Rasmussen, M. D., Galton, D. M., & Paterson, L. G. (1991). Effects of pre-milking teat preparation on spores of anaerobes bacteria and iodine residues in milk. Journal Dairy Science, 74(8), 2472–2478. http://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78423-3
Ruegg, P. L. (2003). The role of hygiene in efficient milking. Milking and milk quality No. 406. University of Wisconsin. Recovered March 10, 2019 from http://www.dairyweb.ca/Resources/Babcock/MilkingHygiene.pdf
Ruegg, P. L. (2011). Managing mastitis and producing high quality milk. In C. Risco, & P. Melendez, (Eds.), Dairy production medicine (Chapter 18, p. 207–232). Wiley-Blackwell. http://doi.org/10.1002/9780470960554.ch18
Schepers, J. A., & Dijkhuizen, A. A. (1991). The economics of mastitis and mastitis control in dairy cattle: a critical analysis of estimates published since 1970. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 10(3), 213-224. http://doi.org/10.1016/0167-5877(91)90005-M
Schreiner, D. A., & Ruegg, P. L. (2003). Relationship between udder and leg hygiene scores and subclinical mastitis. Journal Dairy Science, 86(11), 3460-3465. http://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73950-2
Scott, E., & Bloomfield, S. F. (1990). Investigations of the effectiveness of detergent washing, drying and chemical disinfection on contamination of cleaning cloths. Journal Applied Bacteriology, 68(3), 279–283. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.1990.tb02575.x
Seegers, H., Fourichon, C., & Beaudeau, F. (2003). Production effects related to mastitis and mastitis economics in dairy cattle herds. Veterinary Research, 34(5), 475–491. http://doi.org/10.1051/vetres:2003027
Sordillo, L. M., & Streicher, K. L. (2002). Mammary gland immunity and mastitis susceptibility. Journal Mammary Gland Biology Neoplasia, 7, 135–146. http://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020347818725
Tebbutt, G. M. (1988). Laboratory evaluation of disposable and reusable disinfectant cloths for cleaning food contact surfaces. Epidemiology & Infection, 101(2), 367–375. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268800054315
Trajtman, N. A., Manickam, K., & Alfa, J. M. (2015). Microfiber cloths reduce the transfer of Clostridium difficile spores to environmental surfaces compared with cotton cloths. American Journal of Infection Control, 43(7), 686–689. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2015.03.002
WingChing-Jones, R., Monge-Meza, J., & Pérez-Salas, R. (2009). Roedores pequeños en un sistema de producción de ganado lechero. Agronomía Mesoamericana, 20(1), 127–133. http://doi.org/10.15517/am.v20i1.4988
Younan, M. (2004). Milk hygiene and udder health. In Z. Farahandand, & A. Fischer, (Eds.), Milk and meat from the camel. Handbook on products and processing (p. 67–76). Verlag der Fachvereine Hochsch.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
1. Proposed policy for open access journals
Authors who publish in this journal accept the following conditions:
a. Authors retain the copyright and assign to the journal the right to the first publication, with the work registered under the attribution, non-commercial and no-derivative license from Creative Commons, which allows third parties to use what has been published as long as they mention the authorship of the work and upon first publication in this journal, the work may not be used for commercial purposes and the publications may not be used to remix, transform or create another work.
b. Authors may enter into additional independent contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (e.g., including it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book) provided that they clearly indicate that the work was first published in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to publish their work on the Internet (e.g. on institutional or personal pages) before and during the review and publication process, as it may lead to productive exchanges and faster and wider dissemination of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).