Comparación productiva de forraje verde hidropónico de maíz, arroz y sorgo negro forrajero
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15517/am.v19i2.5005Keywords:
Forraje, hidroponía, nutrición animal, pastos, cultivos, Forage, hydroponics, animal nutrition, pasture, cropsAbstract
La investigación se desarrolló en la Estación Expeperimental "Alfredo Volio Mata" de la Universidad de Costa Rica durante el mes de agosto del año 2006, donde se evaluaron tres forrajes (Zea mays, Sorghum almun y Oryza sativa) bajo un sistema de producción hidropónico. La mayor producción de biomasa fresca (21,65 kg/720 cm2) fue dada por el sorgo que a su vez manifestó una mayor concentración de proteína cruda (10,47 %). El arroz resultó ser la especie con contenidos de materia seca (15,82%) y cenizas (9,17%) superior, mientras que el maíz presentó una mejor calidad de fibra. Con estos resultados se puede deducir que los sistemas de producción hidropónica representan una alternativa más para el cultivo rápido y simple de forraje durante las épocas adversas.Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
1. Proposed policy for open access journals
Authors who publish in this journal accept the following conditions:
a. Authors retain the copyright and assign to the journal the right to the first publication, with the work registered under the attribution, non-commercial and no-derivative license from Creative Commons, which allows third parties to use what has been published as long as they mention the authorship of the work and upon first publication in this journal, the work may not be used for commercial purposes and the publications may not be used to remix, transform or create another work.
b. Authors may enter into additional independent contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (e.g., including it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book) provided that they clearly indicate that the work was first published in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to publish their work on the Internet (e.g. on institutional or personal pages) before and during the review and publication process, as it may lead to productive exchanges and faster and wider dissemination of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
